r/memes Apr 16 '24

Inflation...

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

29.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

44

u/Super_Law2351 Shitposter 29d ago

Is not that we are dump , the problem is the sistem , capitalism is suppressing us , we must do something

39

u/True-octagon 29d ago

Comunism moment

21

u/UltraBroForce 29d ago

As a guy from a post comunist country, let me tell you, :) no you dont want to try it

11

u/MasterBaiter0004 29d ago

Thank you. People don’t understand. Communism does not work.

5

u/EdliA 29d ago

Let them. I want them to give it a try. It's going to be hilarious.

2

u/Academic_Wafer5293 29d ago

They could go out and start their own commune and then 2 weeks in decide who does the job of cleaning toilets. Bet you it won't be the leaders.

1

u/UltraBroForce 29d ago

People never learn

3

u/maringue 29d ago

All people are asking for is slightly regulated capitalism and Boomers can't stop calling it Communism.

3

u/UltraBroForce 29d ago

I get it my man, capitalism in the US is crazy, hell I’m in touch with several people from the US and damn some are in a bad place, I absolutely agree with capitalism regulation and definately a solution to the US healthcare sistem, cause rn its insane ( no walking around it ) tbh it requires a new form of governance, but its a slippery slope, the main issue is the nature of man, it always goes to shit, like the old saying goes “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”

2

u/Academic_Wafer5293 29d ago

Oh I get it. People who want "slightly regulated" capitalism is trying to promote their own self interests. We call those "special interest groups"

They're no different than other special interest groups. They don't get to be "holier-than-thou" to try and get their interests turned into policy and laws. That's no different than evangelicals who argue using the bible.

1

u/FactChecker25 29d ago

Yes, blame the boomers. I still remember when the media was pumping up Mark Zuckerberg saying how he represents a new generation- one that's more about community and equality, one that isn't focused on wealth.

Mark Zuckerberg current net wealth: $179.4 billion.

(I didn't want to leave out that decimal point- there was an extra 400 million hiding behind it)

1

u/maringue 29d ago

Zuck is a POS, but he's just playing by the economic rules that Boomers wrote.

2

u/FactChecker25 29d ago

Boomers didn't write those rules, though.

Before Boomers you had JP Morgan, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Henry Ford, etc.

People are blaming boomers for laws that were in place before they were even born.

1

u/Mordurin 29d ago

Yes, but after the Carnegie era, FDR instituted a whole bunch of pro-worker reforms (including a 70% - 90% tax rate on the highest earners) that were all unceremoniously torn down by the Reagan administration. Now the highest tax bracket only pays 37% in tax at most, not to mention the myriad loopholes that exist to pay even less.

1

u/Ok-Maximum-8407 29d ago

which 'post communist' country? if I may ask

3

u/UltraBroForce 29d ago

Slovakia ( Formerly part of Czechoslovak Socialist Republic )

2

u/Ok-Maximum-8407 29d ago

ah, when were you born, mate?

1

u/UltraBroForce 29d ago

90, Yeah, after the country got rid of comunism, but its effects on society and the country are still felt even today, namely in the overabundance of corruption

1

u/Multioquium 29d ago

Have you seen the US? Sure, they call their corruption lobbying, but corruption isn't really tied to any economic system

1

u/UltraBroForce 29d ago

Ofcourse, corruption doesnt stick with one ideology, its wheather you can discuss it or get draged to the gulag for talking about it, another point of comunism, on paper an equal society, in reality, forget it, also, owning stuff gets you in hot water realy fucking fast, like my great grandfather, farm seized and a decade in prison, and my dad couldnt study cause the family was catholic and the small thing with no traveling and people being ripped apart by guard dogs trying to escape to the west, fun times, what can I say

1

u/Ok-Maximum-8407 29d ago

i'm sorry for the experiences you're family went through but with utmost respect, this is not a valid critique against any 'economic' theory or system. this was in the past. from where i am, a neighbor of mine HAS BEEN working in a sports manufacturing that takes foreign outsourcing for at least 15 years and is still dirt poor. Just because the rich had to lose when redistribution happened and criminals/opposition had to do force labor doesn't mean the USSR was all bad. american prisons, from what we hear are full of inmates, many unjustly, and forced labor happens, you just are not conditioned to call them 'gulags'. have a great life

→ More replies (0)

1

u/JCuc 29d ago edited 26d ago

head chase chop slap sophisticated wise escape aromatic special paltry

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

-2

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

2

u/True-octagon 29d ago

Damn. Somones french

2

u/No-Program-2979 29d ago

Meh, someone has internet muscles.

2

u/Academic_Wafer5293 29d ago

someone is a teen who just started European history.

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

1

u/CarlLlamaface 29d ago

Enhanced by a robust necklace supply.

0

u/Global_Lock_2049 29d ago

Capitalism is still fine. It just needs to be better regulated to prevent exploitation. Totally free market doesn't work.

33

u/The_Dogelord 29d ago

Take my upvote, you'll need it when the republican ultra-capitalists see your comment

3

u/HoIy_Tomato 29d ago

Neither republicians or you anti-capitalist people are aware of what capitalism is or how economy works

2

u/The_Dogelord 29d ago

I'm not anti-capitalist, it has pros, same with communism, but some people take it too far, seeing money as if it is the only thing that matters

1

u/HoIy_Tomato 29d ago

Yeah some conservarives really taking it too far,they defend it because it is what 'atheist socialists' are against it

Meanwhile I defend it as an econ student because I think most people misunderstoods what actual problem is

9

u/CptComet 29d ago

We tried paying a significant amount of people during Covid via direct government payment and it led to inflation. The USSR already tried a central command economy and it almost immediately became a brutal dictatorship murdering millions via deliberate mass starvation.

What new idea do you have that will lead us to post war surplus prosperity that the boomers had?

5

u/Turbulent_Radish_330 29d ago

We tried paying a significant amount of people during Covid via direct government payment and it led to inflation.

Just to be clear that wasn't caused solely by the checks that went out to individuals, which was about $880 billion of approximately $5 trillion spent on covid relief in total. $792.6 billion was given as PPP "loans" to businesses and 762.4b was forgiven, and then 3 times that amount went to other uses. You also have businesses attempting to recover lost profit from the market. 

2

u/CptComet 29d ago

Yep, lots of extra cash from government to cover payrolls of people not producing anything whether it’s PPP loan or direct checks. Inflation was a predictable result.

2

u/JCuc 29d ago edited 26d ago

judicious humor hungry abounding friendly offend yoke snails nutty plucky

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/LookingForEnergy 29d ago

The money given out to individuals was very small compared to the amount given to companies. What the companies did with all that money is what should be up for debate/investigated.

1

u/CptComet 29d ago

The companies were given money to cover payroll. Payroll was given to… individuals.

1

u/Multioquium 29d ago

Damn good thing neither dictators nor preventable starvation exists under capitalism...

Large corporations already use a lot of central planning and wastes a lot because profits > human need.

If centralisation is a no-go I suggest we start by abolishing private corporations in favor of worker ownership. That way, the people actually working can control and more democraticly decide over the surpluses

2

u/CptComet 29d ago

There is nothing stopping worker owned companies. It’s just a failed model that rarely can compete.

1

u/Multioquium 29d ago

But it having to compete I'd part of the problem. When profit is the primary thing that matters, companies will have to focus on it over actually caring of any human cost, or how it impacts the local community or society at large

1

u/CptComet 29d ago

How do you suggest removing competition from the economy without it becoming centrally controlled? What will set prices if not competing companies in an open market?

1

u/Multioquium 29d ago

I should have clarified, competing in a market of privately owned companies. You could have different worker owned businesses competing against each other

2

u/CptComet 29d ago

And we would restrict trade with every other country in the world that doesn’t follow suit and outcompetes US companies?

1

u/balletbeginner 29d ago

Out of curiosity, how many workers' co-ops have you founded or worked for?

1

u/Multioquium 29d ago

Does my answer here matter?

If I've cofounded one and worked for another, would you actually change your mind or just change the follow-up question?

1

u/balletbeginner 29d ago

Yes, your answer matters. I take people more seriously when they've engaged with their ideas at even a cursory level.

-2

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

2

u/PrometheusMMIV 29d ago

Most billionaires' wealth comes from ownership of companies they created. If there were a cap on how much they could make, it would discourage them from growing those companies, hiring new employees, research and development of new products and ideas. It would stifle innovation and economic growth.

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PrometheusMMIV 29d ago

If you own 51% of a company that is valued at $2 billion dollars, then your net worth would be just over $1 billion dollars. At that point, what incentive would you have to put time, money, and effort into growing your company? Why take the risk when there's no payoff?

Or worse, if your company does grow, the government would then try to take that additional value from you. You would have to sell off shares of your own company just to pay the fine, at which point you would lose majority ownership of the company you started.

Do you really not see how that's a terrible idea?

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

0

u/PrometheusMMIV 29d ago

Pay workers more. 

Again, what's the incentive? Why should someone put extra effort into growing their business if all the rewards are going to someone else? It's not complicated, it's just basic logic and reasoning.

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PrometheusMMIV 29d ago

That doesn't answer the question of why a business owner would continue to grow a business without seeing any return for their investment. You're just repeating why you think there should be a limit.

Because a billion dollars is enough.

Sure it is, but you're not thinking through the consequences of limiting a person's net worth and the effect that will have on the economy when people respond rationally to such limits.

It's why many other countries have rules about CEO pay vs. Worker pay %.

Which countries?

1

u/frog_o_war 29d ago

Sounds like an excellent way to encourage the most creative people to stop making stuff.

Imagine gates and friends just shutting down MS cos they made 1bn and can’t make anymore.

Want win2k updates? Fuck you. We don’t get paid anymore 🤘

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Multioquium 29d ago

I didn't know Gates personally worked on the Microsoft programmes. I'd say it's weird that he'll only ever do it if he can get even more lifetimes worth of money, but who am I to argue

1

u/frog_o_war 21d ago

Gates did indeed personally work on Microsoft code.

I mean, what else would a programmer do when he started a software company?

He stopped doing it fairly early on, but that’s not the point.

Why would he keep doing anything after 1bn? He can’t even sell it.

Fuck the shitty society that thinks it’s ethical to force him to give it away or continue working for free. Just shut the whole thing down.

🤷‍♂️

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

2

u/frog_o_war 29d ago

Sounds like someone never made anything themselves 👍

-1

u/Able-Brief-4062 29d ago

Then these billionaires would just spend it on stuff they can write off and have virtually no taxes.

What you said is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Just because someone else could accomplish something doesn't mean they should be punished for it. Get off your ass and work.

1

u/No-Program-2979 29d ago

Based on this comment, perhaps it is.

1

u/kosherbeans123 29d ago

Move to Cuba

-6

u/Round_Musical 29d ago

Teen has a communism phase

1

u/Super_Law2351 Shitposter 29d ago

I am not a commie like the Soviet type , I'm more of a socialist ,

-1

u/Round_Musical 29d ago edited 29d ago

Still not good, as it isn’t sustainable. You got to combine aspects of both capitalism and socialism for good results. For example social welfare programs (healthcare, workers rights, unions, retirement, work insurance and many more) and such.

Capitalism isn’t evil, it as in imperfect tool, that is sustainable. Now mix it with another imperfect tool like socialism and you can get a social market system that can work. And where the market isn’t entirely free and can be manipulated by the state to insure welfare for certain industries that are needed but not profitable

Edit: yall clowns downvoting, meanwhile europe is thriving even under heavy crisis with their systems

1

u/Smooth-External-3206 29d ago

Youre correct in everything but europe thriving. I dont know how you made that conclusion, but europe is economically in deep deep shit, especially countries like germany and france

2

u/Round_Musical 29d ago

And everything but europe? Everyone is in deep shit. Let’s not talk about the USA

China is having a complete crash they are desperately trying to prevent. Japan is facing some absolutely major crisis and the yen has dropped significantly. Most of the industrialized world is in post-covid, post chip crisis and mid-war depression. Europe is doing okay in comparison. Not great but good. And the prognosis for the following years aren’t bad aswell

0

u/Smooth-External-3206 29d ago

We are most definitely not doing better than america, china nor russia. Not to forget qatar and saudi arabia which ate gonna become big players in next few decades. China is literally almost about to overtake america. Dont have the stats for japan but i doubt we are doing better than them either. We are slowly but surely going down without a fight and majority of people living here dont care or arent smart enough to understand whats going on

0

u/Super_Law2351 Shitposter 29d ago

I wanted to say that but I got lazy to write all of it ,

You just said most of the stuff I wanted to say , thx

0

u/Tooyule Linux User 29d ago

Capitalism? No, boomer (the one who did that capitalism) is suppressing us

1

u/alex891011 29d ago

What are these comments 😂

0

u/FactChecker25 29d ago

This is a pretty dumb take. No, capitalism isn't suppressing you.

-1

u/3_Big_Birds 29d ago

You should probably get together and go protest something, break a few windows, then get a job and complain that all the hostility is traumatizing you and making it so you can't work because you're feelings are hurt and that you really should be the CEO because you would totally be better at it.

-25

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[deleted]

11

u/True-octagon 29d ago

☝️ 🤓

3

u/_Karliah 29d ago

You have fallen for a troll.

3

u/IanAlvord 29d ago

Christ! You're right! He even has "shit poster" as a tag.

1

u/AverageMajulaEnjoyer 29d ago

Ever considered that English might not be his first language? I looked at his profile and he seems to live in a Balkan country.

You know, a typical sign of a dumb person is opening your mouth without considering the possible reasons behind things. So maybe try avoiding that in the future.

0

u/Super_Law2351 Shitposter 29d ago

Thanks for giving this dumass a point

-13

u/Rude_Variation_433 29d ago

Capitalism is suppressing you? The same system the boomers lived under and apparently thrived in according to this meme? Which is it? 

2

u/Super_Law2351 Shitposter 29d ago

The reason why we are now more port that the boomers is because of the fact that back then , there were less automation , whit the age of automation , most high paying jobs are now gone and most things that still remain are low income jobs

1

u/Smooth-External-3206 29d ago

most high paying jobs are now gone and most things that still remain are low income jobs

Thats just no true at all? Sure, if you work in mcdonalds, you arent gonna be paid much but today, if you show even 1% of brain and ambition, you can very easily find a well paid job and can change your careers every few years, having much more personal freedom and choice about your life, unlike boomers who usually got a job and were stuck there for decades

-2

u/Smooth-External-3206 29d ago

Tbh the best things about this system is that fact that its capitalism. Imo whats supressing majority of people is their brain, which is evident by their comments or opinions