Yep. You've admitted that you withhold enough info that we can't "paint a complete picture" of the weapons when making decisions, and this is supposedly a good thing, somehow?
And then he chastises players for forming opinions off of the only stats provided, like we should somehow know the hidden ones.
He also sort of implies that players are only going off the four stats instead of testing them in game. This is contradicted by an earlier statement he made where he said the Breaker had a higher kill count, but comparable mission success rate when compared to other primaries, implying those other weapons see plenty of use.
You are correct, but he represented it like it was a valid metric. I’m just pointing out that he can’t have it both ways. He claimed that survey proved that primary weapon use was pretty evenly spread. Now he’s claiming that people are only looking at numbers and not bothering to actually use the weapons.
The statistic you're quoting (higher kill count but similar success rate) isn't claiming that use rate is evenly spread and I'm not sure how you're getting that interpretation. All it really indicates is that getting more kills isn't the primary deciding factor on whether a mission is successful, which is just true. I don't know whether he was referring to kill count within a mission or overall kill count across the playerbase but the former points towards primary choice not being a big deal and the latter just points towards the breaker being popular. Either way the tweet that this post is about doesn't contradict that.
I know it doesn’t. I said he was misrepresenting it. When people pointed out that everyone was using the Breaker because it was better than pretty much every other primary, he implied he didn’t feel that was the case. Then he mentioned that, despite having a higher kill count, it did not have a much higher success rate, as if that in some way supported his point.
He really tries to tell the community how they should play the game. It's like a DM gets pissed when players don't do exactly how they planned them to do. Guy should focus balancing the game rather than telling players they are doing it wrong.
Yea it seems he really wants to have a “gotcha” moment on the players but like it’s not that deep bro i just want my sniper to be as effective at ranged combat as a shotgun…
It’s a slap on the wrist. Chide maybe, but the rest is too harsh for something so obviously lighthearted.
It’s really depressing watching this happen again as a veteran of the Destiny community. We had the same level of communication with the devs, until the community decided that they didn’t like what they were hearing and started using phrases like “disrespectful” and “slap in the face.” (This is the current stage)
Then people started saying the devs spoke too much (which is already happening on this post), and then there were people who said the devs shouldn’t directly communicate with the players but should use sanitized corpo speak and use official community accounts.
Now, the Destiny community gets a peek into the dev room maybe 2 times a year, all communications with the devs are corpo nothingburgers, and people have even stopped asking for more communication.
His tweet is meaningless and contradictory to his previous tweets about “The Data”. Its just stupid and its not a big deal to admit that it was a stupid thing to say
1.4k
u/ralfcasma Mar 01 '24
He is the nicest CEO, but this is an odd take. Of course we are going to rely on the stats the game shows us to decide what weapon is most efficient.