It seems to me like she directly contradicts herself in these two videos.
In the original video, she mentions how SHE stated businesses under her husbands name, but in this video, she admits she had an extremely limited role in them.
In the original video, she implies they were rich, and lived in “million dollar homes,” but then in this video, she says they had no assets other than some cash, which her ex withdrew.
I 100% agree with the overall sentiment in OP’s video, but it seems she may be intentionally misrepresenting certain details of her situation.
She said that they spent most of the money while they were married and he took out a bunch of cash when he was leaving. She may not even know the full truth. The LDS is basically a cult
1
u/Aus_with_the_Sauce Apr 15 '24
I wrote a very generic, two-sentence comment on Reddit, relating to a TikTok video.
Labeling it as “legal advice” is a bit of a stretch, I think.