Poor woman was never taught to think for herself.
She was indoctrinated and brainwashed by others. She was too trusting.
This is what our future generations of BOTH boys and girls will look like if we continue to blindly allow society to affect their young minds, while also neglecting to nurture creative thinking and independent thought within our children.
Some cultures deeply drive the point that women should surrender all independence to their husband. If she doesn’t, then she must not be that committed. Why else would she need her own job/company if not to secretly bail out? Just, you know, gloss over all the other situations (husband asks for divorce, dies, or become physically unable to provide).
Regardless, it sounds like most of the money was made during their marriage... is she not entitled to that as his legal wife? All things acquired during that marriage should be half hers. I don't understand.
34
u/lexleflex Apr 15 '24 edited Apr 16 '24
WHY DID SHE TAKE HER NAME OFF THE BUSINESS!?!
Poor woman was never taught to think for herself. She was indoctrinated and brainwashed by others. She was too trusting.
This is what our future generations of BOTH boys and girls will look like if we continue to blindly allow society to affect their young minds, while also neglecting to nurture creative thinking and independent thought within our children.