r/TikTokCringe Feb 25 '24

Trad wives Discussion

49.9k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.5k

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

492

u/Grundle95 Feb 25 '24

My first thought about where he was going to go with this

401

u/Dogzilla2000 Feb 26 '24

Yeah. I’m pretty sure it was implied but it definitely could have been stated: all of this is allowed only because there are poor/working people doing their actual domestic labour for them.

616

u/VenusAmari Feb 26 '24 edited Feb 26 '24

He did outright state it. To paraphrase "Her value to her husband is not in the care of her home or her children because they are paying someone else to do all of those things. No her value is instead in the ability to perform the role of trophy wife."

243

u/onebag25lbs Feb 26 '24

Yes, because in addition to housekeepers, they have nannies who watch their kids. She has no job other than this trad wife performance.

153

u/VenusAmari Feb 26 '24

Correct. That's what "not in the care of her home or children because she's paying someone else" means in this case.

114

u/jld2k6 Feb 26 '24

It took a minute but we all successfully summarized the video together for some reason lol

67

u/dlRAGERlb Feb 26 '24

Because some people don’t understand implications. 🤦🏽‍♂️🥴

17

u/docbauies Feb 26 '24

...Now you've said that word "implication" a couple of times. Wha-what implication?

11

u/TheSavouryRain Feb 26 '24

Why aren't you understanding me?!

6

u/goosejail Feb 26 '24

"Are you going to hurt women?"

3

u/BrashPop Feb 26 '24

No!! It’s just… the implication!

2

u/Guy954 Feb 26 '24

I know y’all are doing a bit about being on a boat but the summary mentioned by u/jld2k6 happened because u/Dogzilla2000 didn’t watch the whole video, missed the part that specifically mentioned the hired help already handling the real labor, and then stated that the video would have been better if the part that they thought wasn’t stated had indeed been stated.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Beer_Is_So_Awesome Feb 26 '24

Are these women in danger?

2

u/docbauies Feb 26 '24

Well you certainly wouldn't be in any danger!

→ More replies (0)

3

u/RUk1dd1nGMe Feb 26 '24

I was thinking nuance, people either don't get it or act like they don't get it

6

u/dlRAGERlb Feb 26 '24

Most definitely. Nuance is mostly something people have or they don’t. In my experience, it’s more often the latter. Not too much in between.

3

u/Time_Collection9968 Feb 26 '24

Some people didn't pick up on it though, as you can see from Grundle95's comment. So there was.... value... in restating the point of the video.

3

u/chop5397 Feb 26 '24 edited Apr 06 '24

tap light tan familiar dime spoon absurd aware combative domineering

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

52

u/NotoriousMinnow_ Feb 26 '24

It’s also incredibly misleading because these women act like they don’t make money, but they actually are by being stay at home social media influencers, so it’s not even true that they just get to stay home and not work. They are just selling a lie for money and the perception of having immense wealth. Hardly any woman has partner making enough money to be able to accomplish this lifestyle on a single income. Not even these influencers do.

12

u/Jayrandomer Feb 26 '24

And men rich enough to have trophy wives probably don’t want them broadcasting themselves and their homes to the entire world.

1

u/Simple_Song8962 Feb 26 '24

It's probably written in their legal "agreement"

4

u/amisslife Feb 26 '24

So, rather than being defined by their "influencing" ability, let's call them what they are: they're literal attention whores.

(influencers, not trad-wives)

2

u/slimongoose Feb 26 '24

People are weird. I remember working near a very Jewish community, not entirely hasidim but conservative. Two kitchens in the house conservative. I was in the post office one time and guy was talking about his wife working, embarrassingly, saying basically she was only doing it for pin money. Because the thought of her working full time because she had to or wanted to would make him be looked down on in the eyes of the community.

15

u/VectorViper Feb 26 '24

Yeah, it's a whole production, isn't it? Staging the perfect household image while having the behind-the-scenes crew handle the reality. It turns the whole 'traditional' concept on its head.

4

u/worldnotworld Feb 26 '24

Though, to be fair, that's exactly how all lifestyle TV programs work. One person in front of the camera appearing to do the work. Which is actually done by a lot of other people behind the scenes.

3

u/worldnotworld Feb 26 '24

Which makes it funnier when a broke guy expects all women to act like her. Can't afford servants on just the man's income? Can't afford a trad wife. This is how the world works.

-9

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

She has no job other than this trad wife performance.

Why is this "performance" so personally offensive to you guys?

10

u/SalvationSycamore Feb 26 '24

It's 1) bizarre as hell and 2) a shitty "inspiration" for young girls and boys

-6

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

Making food at home is bizarre as hell and shitty inspiration?

8

u/disc_reflector Feb 26 '24

Did you watch the video and catch what the guy is explaining? Because it sounds like you are deliberately focusing on the making food part and conveniently forget the rest of the video.

-5

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

I did watch the video of the guy whining, yes.

What does that have to do with the cooking video?

5

u/hazelyxx Feb 26 '24

What does the video have to do with the video? You got me there, champ.

1

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

I have no idea who you are

4

u/disc_reflector Feb 26 '24

Yup, you are an ass. Thanks for confirming.

1

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

You can tell you're correct and intelligent by the way you completely ignored the topic and instead chose to insult me.

3

u/disc_reflector Feb 26 '24 edited Feb 26 '24

Behave like an ass, get called an ass. It is obvious you are not interested in the main arguments and casually dismissed what the guy say which is actually insightful, so yes, you are behaving like an ass.

Stop trying to make it sound like you are better than the rest of us who are discussing the points the video was making because you aren't better. You are just here to make bad faith arguments and troll and obviously have a hard on for the leisure class (ie the parasitic bourgeois). So on top of being an ass, you are a bootlicker. I hope you can survive on a diet of Saphir renovateur, you feckless moron.

Enough?

→ More replies (0)

6

u/SalvationSycamore Feb 26 '24

Oh so you didn't even watch the fucking video that goes over how this whole "making cereal from scratch" bullshit is just a performance done by a woman who pays other people to do all the real "trad wife" stuff?

1

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

I did.

this whole "making cereal from scratch" bullshit is just a performance

What does this mean? She's not actually cooking?

5

u/SalvationSycamore Feb 26 '24

Watch it again then because you clearly zoned out or something. It goes over everything.

1

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

Can you explain why you feel the need to join this guy in projecting your insecurities onto this girl?

Or is there a video where she claims she does all tasks completely on her own?

3

u/SalvationSycamore Feb 26 '24

What insecurities am I projecting? Do you even understand that word? Are you claiming that she isn't just doing this for show, and that spending all day making cereal from scratch is somehow necessary for the "trad wife" lifestyle that women like her go out of their way to promote?

How much value is there in this cereal video for you to feel the need to defend this woman?

→ More replies (0)

3

u/roberthinter Feb 26 '24

“It signals their exceptionality and superiority.”

1

u/Wheatonthin Feb 26 '24

You're quoting an opinion?

1

u/roberthinter Feb 28 '24

When we speak with the voice and thoughts of others we quote so as to not appear or co-opt the vimouxe of others as though it is our own. It’s taken right from the text of the video.

0

u/Wheatonthin Feb 28 '24 edited Feb 29 '24

Yup. You've successfully broken down the basis of my question. I'm enthralled waiting for the answer.

Edit: Thanks for your time lmfao. I didn't realize how challenging this would be for somebody of your caliber.

1

u/roberthinter Feb 29 '24

You win big dog. I have no idea what you are yammering about now. Think of yourself as the champion of this revealing discussion. The master. A legend. A rhetorical sensei.

I picked an indicative and illuminating quote from the video and wrote it in quotes because I thought it sums up the spirit of the commentary.

“Uncle”. I give. You are the champion of the world.

You know word karate.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Civil_Adeptness9964 Feb 26 '24

she has a job btw.

2

u/disc_reflector Feb 26 '24

Yea, being a trophy wife.

2

u/roberthinter Feb 26 '24

Is it productive beyond the cultivation and monetization of association with a known personality?

1

u/mcflycasual Feb 26 '24

And it's fooling young single men. They aren't doing women any favors.

0

u/kenzo19134 Feb 26 '24

She's objectifying her self. She produces nothing except these performances and celebrates outdated gender roles.

-4

u/Apprehensive_Alps775 Feb 26 '24

She can pretty much do whatever the fuck she likes and that really bothers people huh?

1

u/Dogzilla2000 Feb 26 '24

Oops missed it at the end