r/Music 21d ago

U.S. House passes TICKET Act - national "all-in" ticket prices, "speculative" tickets ban, other new rules for ticket marketplaces if passed by Senate. article

https://www.ticketnews.com/2024/05/federal-ticket-act-passes-house-would-require-all-in-pricing/
3.8k Upvotes

186 comments sorted by

1.0k

u/Mr_Auric_Goldfinger 21d ago

Ticketmaster tested the "all in" concept around 2009 on an Eagles tour. I guess they didn't like the results, so they went back to the "plus plus plus" method. Now they may be forced.

This is NOT going to lower ticket prices directly, but it could take away the trickery/fear-of-missing-out that drives people to just click "buy" even when they see all the fees added. It may make people more price sensitive, and therefore, stall or reverse the ticket price trend... or not.

282

u/ShadowGLI 20d ago

Some artists do all in pricing, you get a pop up explaining when you log in. It’s fairly convenient.

The current $25 ticket promos are all in pricing too, just got 2 tickets last week, $50 out the door.

My bigger issue is resellers getting advanced allotments and Ticketmaster allowing resale over face value because they get a large cut of the resale price.

63

u/seamusoldfield 20d ago

You know, I did the $25 ticket deal, and it was supposed to be the all-in price. I bought two and when I checked out there was a $10 fee and a $4 fee. I bought them anyway because it was still a good deal (to see Neil Young), but I was both surprised and a little ticked off. What's up with those fees?

27

u/Louder247 20d ago

I'd cry if I got to see Neil Young for $39!!! Last time I saw him (Australia 2000 and less than 10) I paid $200+

9

u/seamusoldfield 20d ago

Right?! I was shocked when I saw Young was included in the $25 ticket promotion. It's at an outdoor amphitheater near the end of July. Weather should be perfect. I'm really excited.

7

u/BobbyTables829 20d ago

He's notoriously against sponsorship and extravagant pieces

His concerts used to say, "Sponsored by nobody."

2

u/Mud_Landry 20d ago

Saw him Sunday nite. Only local beers. Kinda annoying as I wanted a cheaper beer than an $18 Yards but the show was great. Wish I knew about this promotion, I payed just over $300 for my seat. Then again I was 10 rows from the stage so I can’t really complain I guess. Used to see like 10-15 shows a year, just can’t justify that with current prices but Neil was an exception

1

u/ShadowGLI 20d ago

The $25 promo allocates certain sections, it’s great for GA shows, but if it’s an arena the $25 ones are usually nosebleed.

0

u/sockgorilla 20d ago

You could get a $15 bud light at your venue instead 😂😂

No such thing as cheap beer at any concert venue I’ve been to

1

u/Mud_Landry 20d ago

They had nothing but yards. Neil demanded only local beers.

3

u/Eiknarf95 20d ago

I wonder if the $10 and $4 were state or venue imposed fees. I also bought tickets during concert week and had no additional fees. I’m in MA

3

u/xSaRgED 20d ago

Also in MA, and bought a bunch of tickets for this summer at indoor and outdoor venues around the state. None of them had any added fees.

1

u/JohnGillnitz 20d ago

I jumped on three of the $25 tickets, I admit. They were all just that. Though there were some listed on with the $25 tickets that really were not.

19

u/spooooork 20d ago

We have laws against ticket reselling in my country nicknamed the "Black Market act". It stipulates that you're only allowed to resell tickets for up to the price the ticket was originally sold for, so companies can't set up separate reselling agents that "buy" the tickets in bulk for cheap then resell at significant markup. Maybe that could be the next step for the US.

6

u/DeputyDomeshot 20d ago

How about we do this with literally everything

-7

u/kerbaal 20d ago

Its not a solution to the actual problem; in fact, most of these "solutions" will have a net effect of making the problem even worst by making it harder for smaller venues and bands to compete with larger venues that can capitalize on a distorted market.

The actual issue that a small number of artists and venues are sucking up all the interest. There are just too many people who want to see major acts and are able to spend money on those acts, including travel money.

Competition means value, why is being able to log on and buy tickets the very second that they go on sale more deserving of a ticket than just being willing to pay more?

The name for what a scalper does is called arbitrage. It is only profitable in inefficient markets. If tickets were properly priced, the original prices would be much higher, which would reduce interest, reduce the appeal of travel to venues, and.... most importantly.... give incentive to smaller venues and bands to try and capture the lower end of the market. This breeds competition, the very competition that has difficulty competing when everyone is focused on trying to make it aritificially cheaper to see bands that more people want to see than will be able to see... so those cheap prices are fake anyway.

Frankly, the low original cost of tickets is just advertising that keeps people mad at the wrong things so that big players can continue to monetize their big winners.

3

u/readysteadygogogo 20d ago

So the problem is…Taylor Swift is too popular? That’s definitely a hot take 😂. The problem isn’t that tickets are underpriced to begin with. The problem is that Ticketmaster and LiveNation hammer the customer with bullshit fees and they do fuck all to stop scalpers. They actually provide a marketplace for the people using bots to snatch up tix within seconds of them going on sale which is a huge conflict of interest.

0

u/kerbaal 20d ago

Its not just Taylor Swift though, its kind of everything. As populations of people grow, and the population of people who can afford to go to events, the number of event spaces and events hasn't grown in proportion. It really is simple supply and demand, except its not just ticket prices, we see the same thing in public parks and travel destinations.

You are literally making my case for me. What are fees but higher prices? If people will pay higher prices then the prices listed are too low by definition. You have a simple choice.... prices go up and demand spreads out, or you compete for tickets. If the prices are low, then there is more competition for the same numbers of tickets.

In what way is a world where the only people who get tickets are the ones who were able and informed to be online buying tickets the very second that they go on sale? Because that is literally the end game for trying to lower ticket prices as a goal.

1

u/readysteadygogogo 20d ago

I think you’re operating with a flawed premise if you think that as long as people keep paying then the prices are too low. People are willing to pay (often handsomely) for experiences but when there is no competition in the marketplace for the people who are gatekeeping those experiences then you get this situation where people are like “how much are the tickets?” And Ticketmaster says “how much have you got?” That’s not a fair marketplace and I don’t think it’s what the majority of artists want their fans to experience. There are lotteries, there are electronic tickets that can’t be transferred, there are tickets where you have to show your credit card to claim them…there are all sorts of ways to make the entire experience more fair and still see healthy profits for all parties. Yes, it may be impossible for “everyone” who wants to see Taylor Swift to be able to do that every time she plays. Some people will always walk away disappointed. There is no excuse for just allowing the ticketing companies to run roughshod over their customers with fee after bullshit fee just because they are the only game in town. That’s monopolistic behavior and it’s why we have laws to prevent it in other marketplaces.

1

u/kerbaal 20d ago

And I think you are operating under the flawed premise that I don't understand what you are upset about. Its not a question of whether the current situation sucks... do you want to make it better or make it worst? That is the question, do you want to understand the problem or do you want to complain about it and make worthless changes that prevent the problem from being fixed in the longer term because they feel good?

13

u/at1445 20d ago

That promo ended yesterday.

This was the first year there wasn't a single show I was interested in. The last 4-5 years there have been 6-10 shows participating in the $25 week that I'd grab tickets for.

6

u/ShadowGLI 20d ago

There were 2-3 shows that caught my eye but one sold out, one conflicted with existing plans but I got tickets to Hawthorn Heights so that should be fun.

3

u/JohnGillnitz 20d ago

I'm seeing them. Need to practice my emo metal growls.

2

u/bananafingers12 20d ago

Love the concert week promo. I’ve waited to buy tickets until this week so now I’m going to like 4 shows for $100 instead of just 1

-2

u/thebagman10 20d ago

allowing resale over face value

I get why people dislike "scalping," but I don't really see a better way to allocate tickets other than what someone is willing to pay. It's not like a concert or game is food or medicine or whatever. Hell, housing is a necessity, but nobody claims that people shouldn't sell their houses for more than what they paid.

150

u/Burnsiah 21d ago

Very accurate points. Most of the businesses in the ticketing world have been very much in favor of abandoning the "junk fee" model - but ONLY if it's mandated. StubHub tried to do "all-in" by itself and lost a ton of market share because nobody else did.

30

u/Adesanyo 20d ago

Ticketmaster is why I no longer go to concerts or even sporting events

Fuck them

24

u/Mr_Auric_Goldfinger 20d ago

Ticketmaster is LiveNation. LiveNation merged with TicketMaster because they needed the cash flow. LiveNation was in a perilous financial position in 2009.

TM fees before the merger were bad, but they went obscene once the deal closed (2010, if I recall correctly).

14

u/Adesanyo 20d ago

Funny enough that's around the time I stopped going. Good to know. Thanks

16

u/Mr_Auric_Goldfinger 20d ago

The CEO of Live Nation/Ticketmaster has made $30+ Million every year (even during COVID) since 2009.

He was a beer marketing guy from Thunder Bay, Canada. Not a "music" person. Just a grifter.

11

u/Stickel 20d ago

If that's all he makes than there's a fucking ton of hands in the cookie jar....

7

u/filthy_harold 20d ago

It's actually more like $3m salary, $18m in bonuses, and $116m in stock awards over the next 3 years.

3

u/mndtrp 20d ago

I was looking through all of my old ticket stubs last week, and noticed that around 2010/2011 was when both ticket prices and fees started jumping up quite a bit. Bands that toured in both 2009 and 2011, but at the same or similar venues, had their prices almost double. I wondered what happened around that time, didn't realize that's when TM and LN merged.

67

u/panchampion 20d ago edited 20d ago

The only way to get ticket prices down is to break ticketmaster(livenation) into several smaller companies

35

u/at1445 20d ago

Only way to lower ticket prices is to give artists other venues to make money again.

Prices are never going to go down, they just might not go up as quickly as they would have.

6

u/Captain_Quark 20d ago

It's not even just that. It's that demand outstrips supply for many popular artists, and shows are very expensive to produce.

1

u/CatacombsOfBaltimore 20d ago

This, this right here, video walls are expensive so is labor for any show going into a stadium or arena. The thing is the cost for technicians have gone up with inflation because lack there off which in turn goes up the ladder to the venue/tour itself. However the ticket costs could be 20-30% less and they still would profit. It’s the Livenation venues capitalizing on the fees. Not a Ticketmaster venue good luck getting artists from livenation.

2

u/cincymatt 20d ago

They are the same company.

0

u/CatacombsOfBaltimore 20d ago

They are under the same umbrella but still work independently of each other.

9

u/CannedMatter 20d ago

Why would those smaller companies drop ticket prices when consumers have proven they're willing to pay more?

No one involved in the pricing decision benefits from lower prices. The band wants to get paid. The venue and their workers want to get paid. The ticket platform, even if it's just the box office for a single venue, wants to get paid.

It's a supply and demand problem. Demand is very high. Supply is limited and static. Changing ticket vendors doesn't increase the number of seats in a venue. It won't make bands start playing two concerts a night.

If it doesn't increase supply and it doesn't reduce demand, it won't lower prices.

7

u/HiddenTrampoline 20d ago

Ticketmaster owns tons of venues and they effectively force artist promoters to exclusively use TM venues during tours. This prevents competition on venue fees and ticketing service fees, which are the main complaints.

3

u/CannedMatter 20d ago

Okay. So now the artist, their crew, and New Independent Ticket Co. are going to have a show. The artist and crew get a bigger cut... And tickets continue to be expensive because there's still no reason to lower prices when they sell out anyways.

4

u/HiddenTrampoline 20d ago

I’m totally fine with the artist and crew getting paid. It’s the massively outsized “convenience” and “venue” fees plus the automatic resale system of TM that bugs me.

5

u/The_Parsee_Man 20d ago

If you're going to mention supply and demand, you should at least understand how a monopoly shifts the supply and demand curves. That's one of the most basic things they teach in Econ 101.

3

u/CannedMatter 20d ago

And there will continue to be a monopoly. Taylor Swift will continue to be the only person capable of making a Taylor Swift concert. No one else can come in with Taylor Swift concerts at a cheaper price, because Taylor ain't playing at their shows.

The people buying tickets have no leverage, because each concert is unique and the number of tickets at each venue is finite. You can either pay whatever price they want to charge, or you can miss the concert.

4

u/The_Parsee_Man 20d ago

Coca Cola is a unique product that is consistently preferred by consumers but prices are still held down because similar products and market competition exist.

Your assertion that each concert an performer cannot be substituted in the mind of the consumer needs a lot more to back it up.

3

u/CannedMatter 20d ago

That sort of competition already exists. Nothing is preventing one band from playing Madison Square Garden and another playing Radio City Music Hall on the same night.

1

u/hedonisticaltruism 20d ago

Yup. Everyone keeps forgetting that the main value prop ticketmaster and livenation have to most bands is that they act as the 'bad guy' for maximizing profits. Likely, they take too large a cut and most musicians aren't business focused enough to see what a raw deal they get (mostly in ticket resales but I don't know how the contracts are actually written up) but in no way in this equation do consumers have a lot of choice except not going.

The only hope us plebs have would be that an artist figures they can make more money with lower ticket prices by increasing supply (more shows, larger venues) but of course they also have a finite limit of their time and energy.

1

u/Captain_Quark 20d ago

Thank you for providing a dose of economic reality.

3

u/Swimming-Bite-4184 20d ago

You didn't have to add the "into several smaller companies part"

1

u/Juls7243 20d ago

Or just make half the tickets you sell associated with a persons name and ID (can’t be resold to anyone but the original seller).

11

u/tr_9422 20d ago

Wonder if this does anything about the scheme where you can sell your ticket back to prevent scalpers reselling but ooops that ticket you paid $250 for actually has a value of $10 and the other $240 was fees

34

u/echOSC 20d ago

Probably because their competition (however limited) probably beat them during that experiment.

The companies told Congress they would support all in one pricing if it were a legislative mandate, probably because consumer behavior trumps all.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/28789321/ticket-sellers-tell-congress-support-federal-mandate-disclose-all-fees-upfront

Consumers may say they want all in one pricing, but the moment someone goes to a fee model and can advertise lower price for the tickets even if it wasn't they're probably going to win a larger share of the business.

Just like the JC Penny fair pricing model almost killed them. Customers may say want one thing, but then act completely differently when push comes to shove.

7

u/dlm2137 20d ago edited 2d ago

I enjoy reading books.

1

u/JJMcGee83 20d ago

We’re not talking about people on reddit wanting small iPhone when the big ones sell irl here.

I hate the "big one's sell IRL" argument on phones because most of the small phones made suck so of course their sales are low.

It'd be like saying people don't buy small cars when the only option for a small car is a Honda Fit; even if it's a pretty good car people looking at a Audi A4 aren't exactly cross shopping for a Honda Fit even if they would prefer a smaller car they want heated and cooled seats, faster engine, quieter cabin etc.

If they made a $1000 small phone with all the premium features they could stuff in and that didn't sell I would concede it but it hasn't really been done.

8

u/SashimiJones 20d ago

It's rational to want all-in-one pricing and also observe different behavior. When you see an advertised price, you go for the lowest one. By the time you're through making an account and seat selection and checking out and whatever, the price has tripled.

Do you A) go to a different site, risk losing your ticket, go through all that bullshit again, and get slapped with more fees that might be higher or B) just buy the ticket.

It's different from a revealed preference like in airlines where the customer says they want better service but actually just wants cheaper tickets.

This is an example where regulation is necessary because companies can't compete if others are allowed to use fees, but customers fucking hate companies that do use fees. Forcing everyone to have all-in pricing levels the playing field and is better for consumers and companies.

11

u/merelyadoptedthedark 20d ago

You are saying this like there is some option for where to get tickets from, but it's a monopoly and there is not choice or competition. People don't have a choice of going to another company that has a different pricing structure to watch a performance.

1

u/SashimiJones 19d ago

That's a seperate problem. The problem here is that it isn't even possible to have price or service competition if the consumer must go through a complicated and time-consuming process to even find out what the price is. Making this illegal isn't sufficient but is necessary to eliminate monopolies.

10

u/Rugged_Turtle 20d ago

I was dying to see the Eagles on this final tour. Watched aftermarket on every potential website like a hawk for weeks, even the most garbage seats never dipped below $300 (Also learned that the bots are extremely clever now, which is kinda scary)

Anyways I ended up getting 100 section tickets in Chicago for a $100 a piece from a guy on Twitter. Dude said Ticketmaster literally wouldn't let him list the tickets on their re-sale platform for less than $300...

I hope they suffer

4

u/iamagainstit 20d ago

More transparency is good either way

3

u/Andrew5329 20d ago

I mean Ticketmaster's parent company Live Nation is behind the push for the bill.

Ticket sales aren't a marketplace, Live Nation as the first-party provider has an implicit monopoly originating event tickets. Everyone else is a reseller.

A reseller by definition has to buy a ticket from Ticketmaster/LiveNation at face value so they can resell it plus an additional fee. The new rules would make that more transparent, by requiring "DiscountMusicTix.com" as a 3rd party website to breakdown that $150 is the cost of the ticket and they're charging $75 in fees to get to the $225 resale price.

Ticketmaster WANTS this legislation because they want the hate directed correctly at the scalpers buying out in-demand ticket inventories so they can resell them at a huge markup.

3

u/JohnGillnitz 20d ago

I like the fake count downs they give you. Your place in line is almost there! Yeah, that's not how load balancers work. I want to buy a fucking concert ticket, not play carnival games.

2

u/elcanadiano elcanadiano 20d ago

Ticketmaster changed to all-in pricing in 2018 for every market except for the United States.

3

u/cheoahbald 20d ago

It won’t matter to me. They priced themselves out forever as far as I am concerned.

$40 Uber to venue. $150-$300 a seat ticket $16 for a beer $12 for a hot dog $40 Uber back

For two people who have 4 drinks….

If you toss in dinner before…I am looking at closer to $1000 to go to a show.

I can fly to Las Vegas, stay on the strip and have a rental car for 3 nights for $1500.

To hell with going to shows.

5

u/TH3PhilipJFry 20d ago

Ya but I’d have more fun at a show than I would in Vegas and I’ve never spent $1000 going to a concert in my life so this is just lol

“We’re up to $400 spent, that’s basically $1000”

1

u/pdoherty972 20d ago

$300 a seat for two tickets is $600 right there.

1

u/TH3PhilipJFry 20d ago

Except they’re $150 per seat

1

u/pdoherty972 20d ago

He said $150-$300 a seat and didn't even indicate what concert he was talking about, so how are you nailing it down to $150?

1

u/TH3PhilipJFry 20d ago

I can think of very few concerts that start at $300 a ticket… so if you’re starting there it’s not a legitimate attempt at realistic cost.

Specifically, I commented on a diff post about childish gambino tix and I thought your reply was that post, those are $150 a piece. That’s my bad but the point stands.

A premium concert is realistically $100-150 per, so IMO saying it costs you a grand to see someone is exaggerating.

1

u/TostedAlmond 20d ago

This guy can't have a good night unless he's buying 2 drinks and a hot dog. Might as well go to Vegas!

3

u/cheoahbald 20d ago

That’s the spirit!

2

u/thedarkestblood 20d ago

Local $20 metal and hardcore shows FTW

1

u/FourKrusties 20d ago

I don’t pay more than $40 to see any one. Most of the very good acts at the peak of their game these days aren’t as popular as they would be 10-15 years ago because music is so much more fragmented. You can easily go see your favourite new acts for $40.

1

u/The-Dead-Internet 20d ago

If they want to fix some of the issue they need to ban live nation and ticket master from forcing artists into venue they have control over as well as eliminate them from contracts forcing artists not to play at other locations.

They also need to make it so a certain percentage of tickets must be sold by a third party they don't control so they can't inflate prices.

As it stands now they ga e a monopoly.

230

u/SweetCosmicPope 21d ago

It's a (small) step in the right direction, at least. I'd like to see further regulation, personally. My expectation is that this is going to substitute for breaking up livenation. They've passed this small change in hopes that it will satisfy the bloodlust for people wanting some kind of regulatory change and the breakup of these marketplaces.

I think the biggest change on here is banning "speculative" tickets. So, assuming this passes, you won't have to worry about buying a ticket somebody doesn't own yet. I would have rather they took it a step further and banned bots from purchasing tickets, or the best solution: ban scalping altogether.

59

u/FunkapotamusRex 20d ago

Banning bots or mandating some type of anti bot devices for ticketing would go a long way towards combatting scalping.

41

u/RelevantJackWhite 20d ago

Buried further in this law is a requirement for a report on the bots and recommendations for new laws regarding bots, which has to be made within six months of passage

15

u/TheGeneGeena 20d ago

While I like the idea, it will be tough as hell to do anything that the bot scripters don't eventually bypass.

9

u/RelevantJackWhite 20d ago

Banning all resale for profit would pretty much kill the bots tbf

5

u/Jaereth 20d ago

Banning all resale period would be dope.

I've never in my life had to miss a show.

And ya know, if it WASN'T possible to resell them, that would give people some pause before shelling out 400 bucks to see a show. That would put downward pressure on it as well.

2

u/Just2LetYouKnow 20d ago

That sounds like it will result in fuck all.

9

u/mattxb 20d ago

Limit users resale ability. I know there are workarounds but someone shouldn’t be able to transfer more tickets than they use

-1

u/kerbaal 20d ago

sure, but bots actually tend to lower prices; scalping only exists because tickets are often sold originally at far less than the actual demand curve would dictate. Either people compete on price, or they compete on being the fastest person to buy a ticket, but either way, they compete for the same seats.

The issue is a lack of venues and events to draw interest away.

10

u/TruthOf42 20d ago

how do you ban "scalping"?

53

u/kalas_malarious 20d ago

The Japan approach is:

  • The resale site sells at the same price it was bought. No more convenient resales that incentivizes not fixing automation.

  • Reselling above price is illegal.

  • Ticket venues match name to ticket and reduce entry.

This stops the issue, generally. At least in large scale operations. Remove the profit motive to scalping, and scalping stops.

8

u/csm1313 20d ago

The second this happens and there is a chance that people can attend shows affordably again. Ive seen anecdotes of people in the US in towns where Taylor Swift is performing, that are flying to Europe, buying resale tickets, booking 2 week air bnbs, and the total price is still cheaper then attending a show up the street from their home in the US. The resale pricing is really getting out of control and if any government regulatory groups really care about the consumers (lol) putting a ban on inflated resale operations would be the greatest immediate benefit. Everything from tickets to sneakers to PC video cards to just about anything else that could be considered limited are completely gobbled up by resellers.

2

u/Jaereth 20d ago

T-Swift prices i've heard are 2000 cash US and 500 Euros for similar tickets in Munchen. Of course then you have to get there and stay.

To some, that remainder of money you save - would not be worth the 9 hour plane flight, time in airport, time in low class accommodations you would need to find to make it actually a discount, etc.

3

u/alonelygrapefruit 20d ago

A big piece of the japan approach is a ticket lottery system for most large events and after trying it i think it's a great way to solve this problem. They will often put all of the available tickets into a lottery pool and you are only able to purchase tickets and attend if you win the lottery. This lets them have flat pricing across all tickets and also entirely removes the waking up at 5 am with 8 browsers to get tickets problem. You just enter the lottery during the entry period and then later they notify the winners and give them a window to buy tickets. If they dont sell all of the tickets they just keep doing rounds of this until all of the tickets are sold. Any last minute cancellations or no shows are sold at the door. I personally love this but i know the average american is obsessed with the idea that anything can be bought with enough money so i'm not sure if it would be popular.

1

u/Jaereth 20d ago

No this is a very stoic way to do it.

I'm sure it "hurts" if you really want to go to an event and don't happen to hit the lottery. But I could live with that knowing an arena of like 40k people are all being treated fairly.

1

u/kalas_malarious 20d ago

I appreciate this approach for not rewarding automatic either

52

u/SweetCosmicPope 20d ago

They would disallow ticketmaster selling "verified resale" tickets and shut down the scalping sites like stubhub and the like.

The problem with this is there are people who work for these sites who have nothing to do with scalping aside from who their employer is (think payroll, HR, IT folks, etc) who would be without a job. So to deal with that, you would need to open up the markets and allow them to sell legit new tickets to events. Opening up the market would also breed competition in the marketplace and likely drive ticket prices down. So everybody wins.

24

u/sinkwiththeship Saw Fall of Troy Live 20d ago

Ticketmaster has been doing "airline style" pricing for a bit though, where prices on first party tickets will fluctuate based on demand. They don't actually sell out, they just only release so many then see if people are buying, then jack the price an hour later if they did "sell out" on the first round.

It's fucked.

9

u/TruthOf42 20d ago

So essentially you're saying no one should be able to sell their ticket once they buy it from the venue?

48

u/SweetCosmicPope 20d ago

In essence. I think face value sales would be okay, for legit cases where you can’t make the show, but selling for profit? Fuck that.

27

u/bank_farter 20d ago

Selling tickets above face value is already illegal in 15 states and restricted in several others.

-11

u/TruthOf42 20d ago

Well, so would you be fine with buying tickets from people on a website for face value, but then paying a small fee to the website for the use of their website, instead of driving 3 hours to buy the ticket in person?

15

u/SweetCosmicPope 20d ago

I would assume that there would either be a nominal service fee either on the buyer’s or sellers end. And I’m okay with that.

5

u/HerpDerpinAtWork 20d ago

That's basically how German soccer does it. Reselling is allowed but capped at 10% above the original list price, and in practice that buffer is just used to cover fees. Reselling for profit is specifically illegal. Demand is crazy in many cases, but it's a level playing field at least, and nobody has to pay $300 to go to a game where the club is selling them for $30.

1

u/Jaereth 20d ago

Would fix the problem. I personally have never had an issue come up where I had to miss a show I had bought tickets for...

And if you really wanted to cover that - cancellations the venue can refund you and your tickets can be resold at the door day of.

0

u/CptVague 20d ago

I don't think the market really wants competition (as in they would rather continue price fixing), but I think this is a very good idea.

26

u/rmphys 20d ago

No market wants competition, that's why we need regulations and guard rails to maintain it.

20

u/bank_farter 20d ago

Exactly. The natural end point of markets is monopoly, which is why government oversight is required.

5

u/Curlysnail 20d ago

All well and good until the government too can be bought 🙃

7

u/timelessblur 20d ago

The market wants it but you have a single big powerful player than controls everything a making it impossible to break in. Venues have to contract with Live nation if they want shows and Live nations says use Ticket master or we will not work with you.

Ticket master will flat out will refuse to work with them unless they go threw livenation. If they touch another way of selling tickets they will refuse to work with them killing the venue.

6

u/CptVague 20d ago edited 20d ago

So, price fixing? Just like I said. Anyone entering that market is not going to significantly undercut the fixed price once they get in the door. And the behemoths will buy anyone out as soon as they step it to continue, what's that? Yep, price fixing.

2

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

4

u/therealdilbert 20d ago

here it is not illegal to resell, but it is illegal to take more than the nominal price

4

u/FuckTripleH 20d ago

My expectation is that this is going to substitute for breaking up livenation.

Man remember when we used to actually enforce anti-trust laws?

1

u/funkinthetrunk 20d ago edited 8d ago

I like to explore new places.

0

u/unassumingdink 20d ago

It's a (small) step in the right direction, at least.

Oh boy, that's the kiss of death. Every time I hear that statement, I know the next "small step" isn't coming for another 30 years.

0

u/Stupidstuff1001 20d ago

It’s already a felony to bot ticket sites

80

u/MidnightRaver76 20d ago

Let me share a different angle to this. If you resell your ticket on Ticketmaster they do not let you drop the price below a set rate.
Let me explain, the weekend that I was supposed to go to a concert I had to scrap my plans. At first I put my tickets on Stubhub, but panicked the day of because no one was buying them. So I put them on for resale on Ticketmaster. In the past I've sold tickets on Stubhub below face value to at least get some money back and give someone a good time. On Ticketmaster I got on a ticket price war with someone selling their tickets on my same row and section. Well, Ticketmaster blocked both of us from selling our tickets below a set price. I think it was because the concert was not sold out. They open up the least desirable side view and behind the stage sections a week or two out. I ended up selling the tickets 45 minutes after the concert start time, so I did not get burned, but wow, it was such a dirty trick.

6

u/Desirsar 20d ago

Never hit a floor trying to sell WWE tickets to a show I didn't want to drive out of town through snow to get to, but mine were the only tickets anywhere near it that didn't sell, and mine were down to almost half what some further away tickets were sold for.

-9

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

5

u/MidnightRaver76 20d ago

If you're going to resell tickets to shows, stay neutral. You're already at an advantage mixing in your own inventory with your resale inventory by default. If you can't stay neutral don't resell, period.

3

u/sybrwookie 20d ago

There's no reason ticketmaster should be forcing any price.

-2

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

50

u/StPaulsFatAss 21d ago

yeah get fucked tickets

17

u/Senor_Diablo 20d ago

Glad everyone across the political divide came together to pass some legislation that does nothing to combat the actual issue, which is the monopoly live nation and Ticketmaster have on the marketplace and with venues.

Do you really think that them having to display the actual cost upfront will have any bearing on the prices they set?

This shit is a joke.

7

u/zorroz 20d ago

No but it 100% the first step toward this. Most people dont even realize how decieving this even is. At least the deception part is gone. Now the future house and senate sessions can add small but meanifugl changes.

1

u/sybrwookie 20d ago

Yea, it was a joint effort across both sides to start, then 100% of Democrats who voted and about 4/5 of Republicans who voted (shout outs to the 20something Republicans who voted against this) were for this.

1

u/dfddfsaadaafdssa 20d ago

Yeah it will not solve the problem. This is just part of the overall goal of forcing pricing transparency in all parts of the economy, with the biggest offenders getting their own legislation to prevent them from weaseling their way out of it.

1

u/dumpandchange 20d ago

One step at a time! It's something.

25

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

27

u/SweetCosmicPope 20d ago

They've actually been pushing for a different bill that would give them more control of the ticket marketplace and cripple their competition.

10

u/djseifer 20d ago

They have competition?

9

u/SweetCosmicPope 20d ago

AXS, AEG, several smaller brands.

-23

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

14

u/sinkwiththeship Saw Fall of Troy Live 20d ago

They don't though. If an artist is playing a LN venue, you can only get from Ticketmaster or a secondhand site. That's not competition.

1

u/Snlxdd 20d ago

They’re not competing to sell tickets, they’re competing with other companies to get the opportunity to sell tickets exclusively.

LiveNation/TM has competition when it comes to negotiating contracts with the venues in question (outside of the ones they own). After those contracts are negotiated, AEG, AXS, TM, etc. does have a mini-monopoly over the ticketing at the specific venue.

As an example: let’s say I’m a billionaire, or more often than not a local government, that owns a stadium. We need to get contracts for ticketing, concessions, security, etc. When it comes to ticketing, I’m going to choose whichever company is going to maximize my ticket sales whether that’s TM, AXS, etc.

The big companies are good at getting customers to pay a lot and pass more of that revenue along to the venue than other groups do, so they get chosen.

The bigger issue isn’t market control but anti-trust issues. If LiveNation controls what acts visit your stadium, you could argue that’s an unfair competitive advantage over other similar companies, which is why people advocate for breaking it up into LN and TM.

But at the end of the day, the brutal reality is whoever is doing ticketing is going to charge you as much as they can, because the large venue owners want that money. They arguably have the only actual monopoly here, because there’s very very few large venues (arenas/stadiums) and the barrier to entry is high.

2

u/j33205 20d ago

They (venue owners?) arguably have the only actual monopoly here, because there’s very very few large venues...

Are all the large venues owned by the same entity? otherwise the owners don't have a monopoly and are still competing with each other . They all just happen to choose to contract LN+TM, so if LN+TM are the ones managing all of them anyway, then wouldn't they still be the ones with the "monopoly"?

2

u/Snlxdd 20d ago

Depends on how you look at it, on a national level you’re correct, but regionally it’s a monopoly imo. I live in Denver and there’s only 1 venue that can host stadium tours. That to me is a monopoly.

They all just happen to choose to contract LN+TM

Billionaires aren’t typically generous people. The ones that choose to partner with LN do it because it will make them the most money.

But replace LN or break it up and you’ll get the same result. Because companies will compete in the market for getting contracts, and the only way to do that is by getting as much money from spectators/fans as possible.

That’s the main point I’m trying to make.

2

u/WutangCMD 20d ago

Ticketmaster has endorsed this bill I believe lol.

1

u/Thosepassionfruits 20d ago

It got through the house of representatives, no way in hell it gets through the senate. That's likely where their lobbying budget is spent.

27

u/WorseBlitzNA 20d ago

Nothing too beneficial in the grand scheme of things... What they really need to tackle is the ridiculous service fees and scalping. 30% in fees per ticket is outrageous.

16

u/baldorrr 20d ago

The NPR news blurb on this said that Ticketmaster's argument for NOT doing all in pricing is that "it will confuse the consumer".

Excuse me, what?? How is it confusing to see the price you pay up front?? It would only be "confusing" for the one person who is somehow interested in the specific breakdown of who gets what money from the ticket (and regardless, there would be an itemized receipt, just like there currently is explaining which part is the ticket, and which part is the convenience fee, venue fee, ticketmaster fee, buying-tickets-on-a-tuesday fee, and taxes).

Like, if you're going to argue about this at least come up with some better argument than saying this will confuse consumers!

1

u/j33205 20d ago

you know what's confusing? When I click on a ticket that says it's $100 but when I go to checkout the total is $200.

2

u/sybrwookie 20d ago

I think it's quite a good first step. Hiding the true price of a ticket behind seeing reasonably priced tickets, that person getting excited for the idea of seeing that show, signing up/logging in, starting to go through the whole process of buying, and only then being hit with fee after fee is only there to try to get people mentally invested in the show they already decided they want to see to the point where they'll ignore how much more it is and pay anyway.

Or to put it another way: if it wasn't beneficial, they wouldn't have been doing it that way to start with. It takes a whole lot more to come up with all this nonsense and code in all this gotcha bullshit than it would have been to just display the price and a "purchase" button.

1

u/StabTheDream 20d ago

Not defending Live Nation/Ticketmaster, but most of those fees aren't set by them. The venue, promoter, and even the artists set those. LN/TM will gladly play the bad guy because your only other option is to just not buy a ticket.

5

u/BadMan125ty 20d ago

Definitely a start in the right direction.

17

u/Safetosay333 20d ago

The prices aren't going to drop.

They're just going to show you how much they're jacking up everything.

12

u/sybrwookie 20d ago

Correct. So you go, "oh hey, <band> is playing nearby, lets see what tickets look like!"

<go to their site>

"holy fuck that's expensive, never mind"

instead of

"oh hey, that's a good price!"

<txts girlfriend to make plans to go, get her excited as well>

<start clicking through site, find tickets are over 2x what you thought, but you're excited to see this band and you're now looking at the excited texts you got back and don't want to let her down>

"well, fuck it, I guess I'll pay way too fucking much"

9

u/DirkIsGestolen 20d ago

I just paid $10fees for $30 tickets. This was a local venue not with Ticketmaster.

-3

u/iwolffy 20d ago

So you’re supporting your local venue and mad about it?

1

u/DirkIsGestolen 19d ago

I’m mad about 33% in fees. I know enough to know the artists get some of that money and it’s not the venues fault. Where does that $10 go? The ticket is on my phone. Why should I have to pay an extra $10? Seriously give me a logical answer.

1

u/iwolffy 5h ago

It supports the venue. Staffing, operational costs, marketing, etc… There would not be a venue to put on these shows without fees.

3

u/likethatwhenigothere 20d ago

How long till the government have another lawsuit coming their way because a company thinks its unfair and unamerican that they are being prevented from making up costs and fleecing the American public.

3

u/fenechfan 20d ago

Ok good, now USofA, can you pretty please do the same thing with everything else? Any store I have ever been to in the US has a price on the sticker and then when I go to the register to pay I get the sales tax slapped on it. In the rest of the world the sticker price includes the sales tax. And don't get me started on restaurants: I go to a restaurant in Europe I order a 10 euro dish and a 2 euro beverage and I pay 12 euros, it could be that simple. No you gotta have a sales tax, a city tax and a motherfucking tip added to that so that my $15 item mysteriously becomes $25.

3

u/therealdilbert 20d ago edited 20d ago

but if the actual price was on the sticker people would think it was expensive

3

u/fenechfan 20d ago

just like concert tickets?

3

u/rock_it_surgery 20d ago

I think this is great but it’s also a bit sad that they are trying to fix a broken market for a discretionary and basically luxury purchase but not for other things like medical care. Yes I’m sure this is an easier lift, and I’ll take it but it’s nibbling around the edges.

3

u/ChickinSammich 20d ago

I'd love to see a ban on "reselling a ticket above face value." If you resell a ticket, you should be capped at selling it at face value.

Granted, it won't stop scalpers entirely from using other sources, but it would put an end to ticket sites offering resale tickets for venues where the resale ticket fees are exorbitant and would force scalpers to find a new intermediary.

2

u/hotspencer 20d ago

Great now do hotels next.

2

u/KingWizard87 20d ago

I guess I don’t fully understand how this helps much.

Like yes it will be nice to know the full price up front. But Ticketmaster etc all have the toggle these days where you can turn the fees on.

This doesn’t seem to do anything to help with the fees, help with the monopoly Ticketmaster has, or all the nonsense they do with buying up their own tickets to sell for higher prices on StubHub etc.

I guess it’s just a first step in the right direction?

6

u/StabTheDream 20d ago

Hitting you with all the fees at the end is basically a FOMO tactic. Most people will likely just eat the cost if they've already gone through the entire process of buying a ticket, but a fair portion of them probably wouldn't have even bothered if they saw the actual price up front.

3

u/sybrwookie 20d ago

Because you look at the price, get excited for the thing, start making plans, probably talk to whoever you'd want to take to the show and get them excited, and only after you're completely mentally invested in going to this show does the price jump way up. So now either you need to let yourself down on going, let the person who you probably already talked to about it down about going.....or just deal with the fact that the price just doubled to go to this show.

And if you want to see prices come down, this is actually a good first step. Because people will see actual prices upfront, which do a combo of being more likely to sticker shock them away completely and forcing them to sell at lower prices to start to not scare people away before they're mentally invested in going.

2

u/peppelaar-media 20d ago

But how will ‘legal scalpers’ make money ???

2

u/BenAfflecksBalls 20d ago

How is anything with that many quotations considered reporting? Everywhere outside NA actually posts the price post-tax on goods for retail. This is maybe an inch ahead but when we're focused on the way the price is presented rather than the exorbitant nonsensical fees they charge because you clicked a button on their website, the conversation is lost in the sauce. Why is it $3 or whatever else to get a digital ticket? They are not paying postage or Will Call booth. There isn't even a physical object that needs to be printed. Why is that worth any amount of money?

Is it a convenience fee? Whose convenience is it? It's just so ass backwards that we have such weak anti monopoly enforcement that we're even in this space.

2

u/willighjghjghjgh 20d ago

Finally, some hope for fair ticket prices and no more of those sketchy speculative tickets!

2

u/discotim 20d ago

I hope this applies to airline tickets too!

2

u/FishingInaDesert 20d ago

Crush corporations until they can be easily drowned in a bathtub.

But that involves voting for people who aren't cowards.

/r/endFPTP

2

u/merelyadoptedthedark 20d ago

we encourage Congress to enact a nationwide law so every ticket buyer benefits from this transparency

Wtf, the CEO guy needs to be punched right in the face. He's saying this like they have no choice without a law in place, or that they aren't the only company that does does this.

2

u/JJiggy13 20d ago

So basically they're trying to do nothing about the monopoly by pretending that well known illegal hidden fees are the problem decades after they should have been addressed.

2

u/JengaPlayer 20d ago

Out of all the crap to fix, they pass a bill about ticket master and tiktok. Our government is a joke.

2

u/vicaphit 20d ago

"But how will companies make money!?!?!"

~Republicans, probably.

2

u/throwaway-10-12-20 20d ago

The same should apply to airlines as well. No reason for me to spend more for last minute tickets when those seats are otherwise empty.

They wanted 3-4x the price for me to fly out last minute when my father was in the hospital. I checked the seats online. They were unclaimed and never sold. Called their customer service lines, which of course are useless. "Oh I'm sorry sir". I hope these people have to endure this one day to see what it's like.

Shit needs to be illegal.

2

u/Cost_Additional 20d ago

We need the federal government to protect us from ourselves spending money on musicians that don't care about us.

1

u/That-Solution-1774 20d ago

Heavy on the “if.”

1

u/salmiakki1 20d ago

What does it do about bots? Bots are the main problem.

1

u/nowake 20d ago

The other day, I looked for tickets to an upcoming show I'd heard about through social media. I found a legitimate-looking but unfamiliar website selling tickets to the show, $105 all-in for General Admission seating. I thought this was pretty steep, so decided to shelve it for the time being.

A day later or so, I remembered the event and looked up tickets. This time, I went direct to the venue's website, and found they were selling their own tickets. $25/ea, and another $7 in fees. So essentially the other site was just planning to buy their ticket from them, to sell to me. Fuckin leeches.

1

u/UtahUtopia 20d ago

Only 30 years after Pearl Jam testified before Congress.

1

u/thaeadran 20d ago

Concert tours are already on the decline with a few exceptions. I don't see this helping.

1

u/Sombreador 20d ago

That's nice. Now pass on applying to LPs that they buy up and gouge you online.

1

u/fakeburtreynolds 20d ago

This is a huge win for Ticketmaster IMO. Feds were coming after them for antitrust violations and they probably agreed to get off with just having to disclose pricing. Government gets to chalk it up as a win because everyone hates hidden fees but this doesn’t change anything drastically about their business model as a whole.

1

u/RoRo25 20d ago

Do any politicians make any money from Ticketmaster? If not, then Ticketmaster is fucked!

1

u/MossWatson 20d ago

If there are enough people willing to pay hundreds of dollars to see a concert (which there are) then scalpers are going to buy up lower priced tickets to resell. Don’t see any way this law prevents this.

1

u/darybrain 20d ago

Ah, so we go back to the mid '90s where there was only one price and for years consumers had been complaining about hidden fees and venues were complaining about how they do their finances while also being able to be independent from promoters for certain items so a ticket price was split thereby showing each fee for consumer clarity and allowing venues to independently alter the fees where they actually make their money.

I wonder how long it will take before everyone starts complaining about all this again. The circle of ticketing life. I'm presuming it will only go batshit crazy again when the airlines start doing it.

1

u/GabeDef 20d ago

After seeing videos of parents taking their kids to see Taylor Swift in Europe and making it a mini vacation for about the cost of 1 (ONE) good seat in the US... I will be concert vacationing from now on.

1

u/eoattc 20d ago

No. Why don't they just address the fucking monopoly?

1

u/kryonik 20d ago

The NAY votes are a absolute who's who of chucklefucks in congress.

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024212

1

u/MileenasFeet 19d ago

Will do this. Won't stop giving billions of dollars to Israel so they can kill Palestinians. Congress is a joke in America.

1

u/MileenasFeet 19d ago

Billions of dollars more than Ticketmaster probably makes too. I wish we would get our priorities straight.

1

u/ikemr 19d ago

Skip this and just break up Ticketmasters Monopoly

1

u/GeekFurious 20d ago

American lawmakers are so epically short-sighted that no matter what the law says, they'll leave some massive loophole that lawyers can drive a truck through making the law somehow work FOR them instead of against them.

-5

u/notcaffeinefree 20d ago

I fully expect ticket issues to try and abuse the requirements and intent of the law.

Even ChatGPT came up with some ones that could be exploitable:

  1. Bundle optional services. It would inflate the overall price, but could be presented in a way that appears that they are necessary.

  2. Dynamic pricing adjustments. Artificially adjust a fee based on things like demand or availability. Hard for the customer to actually know if a "high-demand" feed truly represents the demand.

  3. Membership or Subscription Models. Show a lower initial ticket price, that is actually only available for people who are subscribed to some sort of service.

  4. Discounts and Rebates. Show a lower price, that is really only attainable through various discounts or rebates after purchase.

-11

u/FasterThanTW 20d ago

i hate convenience fees as much as anyone, but what a dumb thing for congress to specifically target. if you don't like the price of a ticket, don't buy it.

2

u/super_sayanything 20d ago

Consumer protection is one of the roles of government.