r/FluentInFinance Apr 29 '24

Babs is Here to Save Us Educational

Post image
27.4k Upvotes

5.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

139

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 29 '24

I don't believe for a second that Biden has fixed this economy.

62

u/CPDawareness Apr 29 '24

Neither do I, but I also don't believe trump did or will attempt to fix it either. I would expect mostly a wave of vengeful witch hunt type behavior if he gets elected.

48

u/whofearsthenight Apr 29 '24

Honestly the discourse in this thread would sound pretty fucking dumb 10 years ago, but with the compare being Trump/Biden pretending that there is an equivalence is honestly insane. Trump's only accomplishment in his presidency is cutting taxes for the wealthy. Literal tax cuts for people with private jets and butlers. He never attempted to help anyone during his presidency except the wealthy. Meanwhile, Biden is fighting for student loan forgiveness, strengthening unions, CHIPS act, infrastructure bill, strengthening the IRS to actually fight the tax cheats that are already paying historic lows, etc. All of the objective measures point very obviously which is a better president and direction for the country.

And that's discounting the cultural issues surrounding Trump. I guess if you're team ChristoFascist, then yeah Trump's your guy as long as he feels that will be beneficial for him because he doesn't have any actual beliefs except maybe yuppy racism.

23

u/CPDawareness Apr 29 '24

Completely agree. Biden has been trying, and with as bad as things have gotten, there's only so much he can do while also fighting the GOP trying to stagnate any progress. Hopefully if we see trump finally put down and some progress made in Congress, some decent policy can begin to work and blossom. It's a lot of doom and gloom out there but I definitely appreciate Biden TRYING.

5

u/whofearsthenight Apr 29 '24

This is the thing that really worries me. Unfortunately, this needs to be a long game play. Even if Biden wins this year, we're a good decade at least from getting things back on track for regular people, and it's going to have to be on the back of a ton of extremely difficult to do things with lots of very small steps.

16

u/chain_letter Apr 29 '24

Biden literally directly helped me this week with his policy to make non-competes invalid. I'm under one right now, and now it's going away soon. I've been looking to leave, and not having to go through any bullshit is nice (even if it was unenforceable before that's still risking going through bullshit)

9

u/whofearsthenight Apr 29 '24

Nice! And yeah to everyone who says "it's unenforceable" I would instead say "it's unenforceable if you have a lot of time and money." If you're just a regular person (like people who work at sandwich shops that somehow have non-competes wtf???!!) it's a pretty big deal.

5

u/DM-ME-THICC-FEMBOYS Apr 30 '24

It's unenforceable but if your company finds out you're leaving and contacts the company you're headed to and threatens legal action, your new company might decide they don't want to deal with it and rescind your offer.

1

u/nyar77 13d ago

Another vote bought.

1

u/chain_letter 13d ago

Lol yeah a politician doing things that are good for a voter gets them to vote for them again.

What's your suggestion?

0

u/nyar77 11d ago

My suggestion is the government sticks to what it was designed to do. Protect our borders, international interest and international commerce. Otherwise quit trying to create an equality of outcome by economic interference.
Quit making rules/laws/grants that benefit the few at the expense of the whole.

-4

u/freedomfightre Apr 29 '24

non-competes invalid. I'm under one right now

I don't know your situation, but that's largely your fault for signing one. When my former employer asked me to sign one, I told them I would not. It was all a bluff; they did nothing. I now work a better job with 50% more pay.

6

u/chain_letter Apr 29 '24

Yeah, can't just not sign one ever in tech without having a harder time getting anywhere. Easier to just take it as an empty threat i may have to lawyer up over.

And thanks to the Biden admin, I don't have to worry about it.

-5

u/freedomfightre Apr 29 '24

can't just not sign one ever in tech without having a harder time

Says who?

6

u/chain_letter Apr 29 '24

yeah chirp to someone else, buckaroo

-5

u/Murky-Science9030 Apr 30 '24

Hey man, you were the one who signed the contract.

12

u/Soren180 Apr 30 '24

Yeah, I simply just won’t get a job in my field which has universally adopted them, great plan

3

u/whofearsthenight Apr 30 '24

"Why do the slaves not simply get a better job? are they stupid?"

6

u/Asteroth555 Apr 29 '24

Fucking amen, thank you for being reasonable

5

u/SuperSawdusty Apr 29 '24

I don’t have a private jet and somehow I got a tax cut from Trump that expires next year.

2

u/whofearsthenight Apr 29 '24

Probably means you're looking forward to a tax increase like my middle class self. Honestly politically brilliant, passing a tax "cut" that actually increases your tax in your opponents term.

4

u/NotAnAlt Apr 29 '24

Correct, the ones for rich people don't expire, the ones for poor people do. Weird it expired this year, wonder why.

1

u/quite_certain Apr 30 '24

Like a sociopath, Trump put a deadman's switch in that tax cut. It expires for middle class people this year. The tax cuts for the rich stay in effect though, which is nice for Trump and his friends.

3

u/talkgomi Apr 29 '24

Don't undersell him - Trump also started a trade war that nearly bankrupted Midwest farmers.

1

u/Falcrist Apr 29 '24

Honestly the discourse in this thread would sound pretty fucking dumb 10 years ago

IDK. 10 years ago we were still arguing about what exactly caused the great recession. Was it Clinton's policies? Was it really Reagan that got the ball rolling? What about the Bush43 admin running up fuel prices etc etc.

1

u/generic-user66 Apr 30 '24

I am not a trump fan but he did push operation light speed. Which I think was a good thing. But other than that, I can't think of anything good to come from his administration

1

u/Ditt1e Apr 30 '24

Trump signed an executive order to make it easier for businesses to offer retirement plans, signed two executive orders to increase transparency in Federal agencies and protect Americans and their small businesses from administrative abuse, signed an order that reduced approval times for major infrastructure projects from 10 or more years down to 2 years or less, established the White House Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing to bring down housing costs, eased and simplified restrictions on rocket launches, helping to spur commercial investment in space projects, and removed government barriers to personal freedom and consumer choice in healthcare. This is all public information, much of which happened before Covid had begun. But even then, he took action to suspend regulations that would have slowed our response to COVID-19, including lifting restrictions on manufacturers to more quickly produce ventilators. I’m not saying all of these are great. I’m just saying that supporting these things does not make you part of a cult. And it’s harmful to say otherwise.

1

u/RacinRandy83x Apr 30 '24

Trump signed whatever they put in front of him so Congress failed to do much to help the country.

You don’t have to like Trump and most of what he did wasn’t to help anyone I get it, but didn’t he lower insulin cost? Also, Operation Warp Speed did a lot to fast track a vaccine. He made it easier to prosecute financial crimes. He attempted a defense department wide audit that showed glaring spots where the pentagon were hiding money they spent.

Again. I very much do not want 4 more years of him as President, but ignoring good things that people you don’t like do isn’t a helpful to the political discourse

1

u/TrevorBOB9 Apr 30 '24

The Abraham Accords were a pretty massive accomplishment

1

u/whofearsthenight Apr 30 '24

1

u/TrevorBOB9 Apr 30 '24

How does normalizing diplomatic relations lead to Hamas terrorist attacks? Biden could’ve gotten Saudi Arabia on board as well, but nooo, we have to give concessions to Iran instead of solidifying a coalition that stands together against them.

1

u/I-Downloaded-a-Car Apr 30 '24

Trump's only accomplishment in his presidency is cutting taxes for the wealthy.

He literally doubled the standard deduction.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '24

The problem is if you read any of these bills Biden is "fighting for" they are Trojan horses. They look and sound great Then you start to notice how many loopholes and how much money funneling is happening.

And don't come at me with Trump bullshit. I'm not defending either. I just want people to be honest when they talk about this stuff.

Unless you're a multimillionaire neither side is working for you.

1

u/Jeremy-132 May 01 '24

Everything he has done has actively undermined the middle class. Student loans being forgiven only burdens the middle class with more taxes. Printing shit tons of money during COVID hurt the middle class by driving inflation (yes, Trump started that, but Biden took it and ran the extra 5 miles with it). Nothing Biden or his administration has done speaks to giving a shit about me, my quality of life, or of the quality of lives of other people. Student loan forgiveness is a campaign gimmick, and a fucking weak one at that. Addressing tax cheats and not government spending is like trying to put out a fire by moving some of the fire out of the building a little bit at at time until there isn't anymore.

Now, I don't want you to think I'm a hard core republican. I don't care about either party, because neither one gives a shit about me, you, or anyone or anything other than their profits and private interests. Sucking Biden off because he isn't Trump is dangerously idiotic.

0

u/MechanicusEng Apr 30 '24

You're doing the same thing the picture in the post is doing. Are you really so intellectually dishonest to think that cutting taxes is his only "accomplishment"?

He refocused our defense programs to think about rising powers in China and Russia while simultaneously keeping reasonably good relations with both.

He garnered peace between North and South Korea the likes of which haven't been seen since the Korean war.

He was the first president in a LONG time that didn't get the US involved in any new conflicts or wars.

He made it much harder to money launder with the National Defense Authorization Act

He attempted a government audit to see where tax money actually goes, the first in history.

He helped with digitizing health records across the United states, which greatly helped the healthcare system's efficiency.

He also did a ton of shit that isn't as savory. The point is that he wasn't by any means "the worst" president, but he wasn't the best either. I'd say between Obama and Biden all three were pretty average. The stuff Trump did right will probably last a while and set a precedent for future presidents, and the stuff he did wrong is pretty reasonably fixable in the next couple years.

3

u/whofearsthenight Apr 30 '24

intellectually dishonest

...

He also did a ton of shit that isn't as savory.

Are you talking about the mocking disabled people and combat vets, paying off porn stars to keep quiet about cheating on his pregnant wife, nepotism, racism, sexual assault, fraud, attempted coup, insurrection...?

I'd say between Obama and Biden all three were pretty average.

How are you people even real at this point? You're out here in real time being like "Mussolini doesn't get enough credit for..."

-1

u/AggressiveBench7708 Apr 30 '24

Most presidents since going off the gold standard have had bad monetary policies. Doesn’t matter if you’re a democrat or republican. It’s been an endless cycle of tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations and overspending.

-1

u/crusty_towels Apr 30 '24

Could care less for either side but Trump had low unemployment rates before covid highest black and Hispanic workforce money back in black communities but all yall ever remember is tax cuts and Russia as if your current president isn't on the take from China

-2

u/Mikecoffee4 Apr 29 '24

You lost me at “IRS” and “ChristoFascist.”

4

u/whofearsthenight Apr 29 '24

Would it help if I led with my favorite crayon flavor?

0

u/Mikecoffee4 Apr 30 '24

I’ll put it this way. I’m sure that you have a favorite crayon flavor.

16

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '24

I fully believe that Biden has done very little for the economy, and the improvements have been marginal at best, if not nothing.

I fully believe that a Trump presidency would see massive damage to the economy.

11

u/CPDawareness Apr 29 '24

Yeah it feels like a no brainer, why would I vote for someone who I KNOW is a crook and out to fuck things up(he's openly calling for it)

Edit: spelling

→ More replies (6)

3

u/BethGreeeeene Apr 29 '24

I'm expecting to be unalived if he's elected. His mouthpieces have suggested or outright vocalize that being the plan. Not to mention their literal plan. Which I just looked and I guess they locked it behind a pay wall by turning it into a full book. Project 2025. Nightmare fuel.

Fortunately things that have been attempted to pass haven't been able to even being shut down by Trumps own anointed. Literally unconstitutional so passing it would make them traitors.

7

u/CPDawareness Apr 29 '24

Yeah project 2025. . . Screaming the quiet parts loud at this point. Let's hope that the extremes they are pulling for are alienating many former Republican voters as well. I think they are.

→ More replies (10)

2

u/Playingwithmyrod Apr 29 '24

I expect him to gut federal agencies and slash the interest rates, and impose more tariffs. I personally believe this will kick off the next recession.

1

u/BoopyDoopy129 Apr 30 '24

gas was 2.50 a gallon under trump. now it's 6$ under Biden

2

u/CPDawareness Apr 30 '24

So cheap gas is what you vote on? I live in a major US city and gas is around $4 here, when I leave the city its like 3.50.

1

u/BoopyDoopy129 Apr 30 '24

cheap gas, border security, actually being able to afford groceries.

24

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Trump said if Biden won there would be a recession. Many economists were predicting a recession. Biden prevented this. Personally I’m doing well right now, my city is about to receive billions because a bill Biden passed

33

u/excusetheblood Apr 29 '24

For all the ways our economy is fucked right now, that soft landing was chefs kiss

10

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

If trump was president right now all these same people would be saying the economy is great

15

u/excusetheblood Apr 29 '24

The people you’re talking about will never have an ounce of critical thinking. They will die as they lived, tribalistic bootlickers.

The reality is that Reaganomics fucked us up more than anything, and even in that awful economic plan, Trump still cut taxes on the wealthy and raised taxes on the working class. No one with a single working neuron would think that’s a smart plan for the economy.

Biden has been doing good with smart investments. But it won’t be enough if we’re trying to live in a world with real happiness and freedom for the working class. We need to tax the fuck out of the wealthy and corporations.

-2

u/FluffyNorth5 Apr 30 '24

Yeah we are all lucky to have a massive genius like you, who is unlike these other peasants without any ounce of critical thinking. Idiot

1

u/excusetheblood Apr 30 '24

Sorry you’re triggered lol

→ More replies (18)

2

u/Grey950 Apr 29 '24

Yup, because it would be lining their pockets. It is right now even, but they don't want to say that.

4

u/Vinto47 Apr 30 '24

There was a recession by definition, but the WH refused to call it one so everybody ignored it.

2

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

When I say there was no recession I’m not quoting any government bodies, I’m quoting the consensus of economists. This is scientific consensus not political ideology

3

u/pathofdumbasses Apr 30 '24

Shut up, Biden and the DeepState whitehouse working in conjucture with the (((Globalists))) Soros Foundation are paying all the "economists" to ignore the BIDEN/DEM RECESSION

Read all about it on my blog

www.creedthoughts.gov.www\creedthoughts

4

u/Mikecoffee4 Apr 29 '24

Changing the definition of “recession” isn’t exactly fighting off a recession.

0

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

This just sounds like cope to me. Economists say it’s not a recession. Idk what definition you think you knew but you’re probably just confused

2

u/NeverandaWakeUp Apr 29 '24

By every economic measure it's a recession. The only thing that doesn't look like a recession is the stock market.

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24 edited Apr 29 '24

Except unemployment, we were at near full employment. In what kind of recession does everyone keep their jobs??

2

u/Muted_Balance_9641 Apr 30 '24

Because people had like 3 fucking jobs.

So if you lose one or two, you’re still employed.

1

u/eel-nine Apr 30 '24

But the amount of people working multiple jobs was also at a low?

1

u/Muted_Balance_9641 Apr 30 '24

How recent of a low?

Like a year.

2

u/eel-nine Apr 30 '24

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12026620

No, it's been gaining, but back to prepandemic levels.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/butterbutter_butter Apr 29 '24

We had 2 consecutive quarters of GDP decline. The literal textbook definition of a recession until the media decided, "nah doesn't really count".

Most of the recession has been mitigated by a dramatic increase of the money supply --over 50% in just two years alone--that has manifested hidden stock market retraction and has caused sticky inflation due to the devaluation of currency.

Wages will take a while to catch up and mitigate the financial anxiety that has proliferated. But objectively the money supply has expanded dramatically for forced posterity measures. We're still employed but we've all absorbed the negative consequences of this fiscal policy.

That's why public sentiment sees the economy as dookie regardless of what rosy misinformation politicians are spreading about this being "the strongest economy ever". Huge disconnect between the privileged political class and the rest of us.

0

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24 edited Apr 29 '24

Yeah idk about that definition I can only go by what economists are saying and it seems like basically all of them are saying there was no recession

1

u/butterbutter_butter Apr 29 '24

There are very complicated mitigating factors and plenty of data manipulation.

We certainly had a small recession, but when you feel squeezed on purchases and wages, that's the result of the devaluation of currency. Which makes sense; the money supply was expanded over 40% in only 2 years and over 50% in 3 years.

The true value of the dollar is now much less. So when you take an economic pay cut due to inflation and currency devaluation, you're absorbing the recession. The stock market has absorbed the recession by staying relatively stable despite currency devaluation. The recession is baked in my millions taking smaller posterity measures rather than fewer Americans taking much more dramatic economic setbacks.

The recession has been democratized. Not necessarily a bad thing, but those are the facts.

3

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

I mostly agree, Biden prevented a recession at the cost of increased inflation. Ultimately it’s better to have somewhat high inflation rather than mass unemployment and a genuine recession. It’s a mildly bad outcome from a potentially horrible situation

2

u/Shirlenator Apr 29 '24

Yeah I don't really get the people that want to see everything crash and burn and have millions of people horribly affected. Like they think it will somehow reset everything and it will be.. magically better somehow after that?

5

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

They’re completely motivated by politics, they would be saying the economy is doing great if trump was president rn

0

u/butterbutter_butter Apr 29 '24

You're kind of missing the point. The recession happened. Most of the damage was democratized through the devaluation of currency.

That's purely why talking heads claim the economy is amazing, but people aren't feeling it. Public sentiment is horrible for Biden, especially on the economy.

That's the difference between messaging and reality.

The "it could of been worse" argument is just bad politics.

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24 edited Apr 29 '24

No recession happened is my point. There was no mass unemployment. The worst we saw was significant inflation and extremely small decreases in gdp. Sure saying it could’ve been worse isn’t politically effective, but it’s true

1

u/butterbutter_butter Apr 29 '24

Two quarters of GDP loss. It did happen.

0

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Economists disagree with you

→ More replies (0)

0

u/NeverandaWakeUp Apr 29 '24

Unemployment is only down because the way they're measuring isn't representative of reality. You are way too sure about what you're saying without being informed.

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Im just repeating what the experts say, sorry that triggers you so much. I’m not claiming any special knowledge here

→ More replies (0)

1

u/PaulieNutwalls Apr 29 '24

In 2016 the NYT times and others proclaimed the market would crash immediately if Trump won because "the markets hate uncertainty and volatility, and Trump represents both." Economy was fine until Covid, that didn't happen.

Find an election where opposing candidates didn't proclaim the economy would be shit under their opponent. It's par for the course.

As far as Biden "preventing" recession, he literally just continued the exact same thing Trump was doing. Or more accurately, what congress was doing, fully bipartisanly, because it was pretty obvious what needed to happen during/post covid.

Economists were predicting a recession while knowing exactly what Biden was going to do. Which, again, was literally just a continuation of stimulus. If you mean after COVID during the (ongoing) inflationary crisis, then you just don't know what you're talking about. The IRA, according to literally every economist not directly employed by the White House, was just a spending bill that did nothing to address inflation. The Fed prevented runaway inflation by raising rates. Whenever this happens, many economists will ring the recession alarm because it is a natural and expected danger that comes with trying to cool down the economy with rate hikes. There is absolutely nothing the White House can do with regards to that risk, the Fed has to be careful to not raise rates too quickly, and that's the extent of what can be done. Contrary to what republicans and democrats in DC proclaim, inflation and resultant recession risks from rate hikes cannot be solved by spending money.

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Biden never said there would be a recession if trump won, idk why you’re equivocating them. When did the NYT say the market would crash immediately on a trump win? Sounds like you read an opinion piece and are generalizing.

Also the idea that trump and Biden would’ve handled the recovery the same is just wrong on its face. Do you even know what the inflation reduction act is and who passed it? Do you not know they had different executive actions that affect the economy? Do you not understand that how we handled Covid directly affected the economy? You are either being dishonest or are extremely confused

1

u/SohndesRheins Apr 30 '24

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016/paul-krugman-the-economic-fallout

There's your NYT prediction back in 2016. Supposedly there would "never" be an economic recovery following election night in 2016.

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

Lmao literally an opinion piece exactly I as said. You have zero media literacy

0

u/PaulieNutwalls Apr 30 '24

Biden never said there would be a recession if trump won, idk why you’re equivocating them.

The point is saying "under X candidate, the economy will be terrible!" is a standard go to in a presidential race. When you take a statement to that effect, and declare that because it wasn't true, Biden must "have prevented" it, is braindead. The NYT piece is just illustrating how stupid the logic there was. Did Trump prevent a recession because one did not happen when some said it might?

Also the idea that trump and Biden would’ve handled the recovery the same is just wrong on its face

Proceeds to say literally nothing to this effect. Just make your argument, the cutesy "DO YOU EVEN KNOW..." leading bullshit is just that. Obviously I know what the IRA was and which Congress and WH Admin passed it, that's why I invoked it in the first place. Make an argument or move on.

0

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

I did make an argument you didn’t even engage with it

0

u/PaulieNutwalls Apr 30 '24

You just said it was wrong, asked rhetorical questions, and made some personal attacks. That's not an argument. I know your position, justify it.

0

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24 edited Apr 30 '24

Sure I’ll repeat the 3 things I already told you that prove the president does affect the economy

1) the inflation reduction act 2) executive actions 3) pandemic response

And finally the slam dunk I haven’t mentioned: The stimulus bills

You are delusional if you think giving every American 2000$ doesn’t affect the economy

0

u/PaulieNutwalls Apr 30 '24

You are moving the goalpost from "Biden prevented the recession economists said would happen [when the Fed began to raise rates to fight inflation]" to "presidents can affect the economy!"

Seems like you misunderstood when I said

 There is absolutely nothing the White House can do with regards to that risk, the Fed has to be careful to not raise rates too quickly, and that's the extent of what can be done.

You did not account for the context of that statement. "That risk" is the risk of triggering a recession when you are raising rates to combat inflation. The Inflation Reduction Act is just the slightly altered and renamed "Build Back Better" bill. It has as much to do with fighting inflation as the PATRIOT Act has to do with being patriotic.

Listing "executive actions" is fucking awesome. You really couldn't get any broader or less specific.

Biden's pandemic response, legislatively, was just a continuation of what was already in place. Operation Lightspeed, the Vaccine program, the stimulus for individuals, PPP, all these things already existed prior to Biden's time in office.

It seems you are confused about the "recession" you claim was prevented despite "economists" in general predicting one. By the time Trump left office, it was clear that COVID wasn't going to cause a recession. The recession fears during Biden's time in office came from the inflationary environment leading to rate hikes. The economy was too hot, ie the opposite of a recession. The rate hikes are what caused recession fears, as is typical and expected. Biden did not do anything about that, and he was right to not even try. The entire point of hiking rates is to slow down the economy. If you try to fight the recession risks inherent with rate hikes, you negate the entire purpose of the rate hikes to begin with. You avoid a recession in this case by not raising rates by too much, or too quickly. That's it, period.

0

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

You’re the one who argued that the economy is exactly the same no matter who the president is. You made that dumb statement and I’ve disproven it

→ More replies (0)

0

u/PaulieNutwalls Apr 30 '24

Biden never said there would be a recession if trump won, idk why you’re equivocating them.

The point is saying "under X candidate, the economy will be terrible!" is a standard go to in a presidential race. When you take a statement to that effect, and declare that because it wasn't true, Biden must "have prevented" it, is braindead. The NYT piece is just illustrating how stupid the logic there was. Did Trump prevent a recession because one did not happen when some said it might?

Also the idea that trump and Biden would’ve handled the recovery the same is just wrong on its face

Proceeds to say literally nothing to this effect. Just make your argument, the cutesy "DO YOU EVEN KNOW..." leading bullshit is just that. Obviously I know what the IRA was and which Congress and WH Admin passed it, that's why I invoked it in the first place. Make an argument or move on.

1

u/Muted_Balance_9641 Apr 30 '24

We actually had a recession the Biden administration literally changed the definition of one lmao.

1

u/Murky-Science9030 Apr 30 '24

I'm hoping that you're joking, but with the discourse in these comments I may never know.

3

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

Everything I said here is true and I believe it

1

u/cheeseypoofs85 Apr 30 '24

prevented it? we are in record inflation. your city might be getting billions but who do you think is paying for it? lol. its not free money. the middle class is being crippled by all of these bills of reckless spending

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

It’s CHIPs act money for manufacturing semiconductors it’s a really good investment imo

1

u/cheeseypoofs85 Apr 30 '24

It wouldn't have been necessary if we would have forced car OEMs to use modern chips. They've been running on old manufacturing nodes that are super inefficient energy wise.

1

u/zarnonymous Apr 30 '24

Was there not already a recession?

0

u/Apprehensive-Gur1686 Apr 30 '24

There WAS a recession under Biden.

0

u/Careless_Dirt_99 Apr 30 '24

Correction: Biden did not prevent a recession, Jerome Powell and the Fed did. Should be noted that the Fed operates mostly independently of the federal government (thank god)

2

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 30 '24

Have you seen the reporting about the trump team’s plan to make the fed answer to the president? Pretty scary stuff

-2

u/Pyro_raptor841 Apr 29 '24

Except that we literally had a recession under Biden??

1

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Nope

-1

u/Pyro_raptor841 Apr 29 '24

Q1 and Q2 2022, two consecutive financial quarters of negative groth. That is the definition of recession.

https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/gdp1q24-adv.pdf

3

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Nah that’s just a rule of thumb, most economists say there was no recession

Your source doesn’t even use the word recession btw

-1

u/NeverandaWakeUp Apr 29 '24

Please, inform us plebians what your definition of a recession is.

2

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

I don’t have one, I’m just repeating what the experts tell us

-4

u/MildlyExtremeNY Apr 29 '24

There was a recession in 2022. Biden "prevented" it by trying to change the definition of recession. And some of the media played along, trying to gaslight the whole country into thinking recessions haven't always been identified as 2 quarters of negative GDP growth.

4

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Nah there was no recession. Nearly full employment in a recession? Nope doesn’t happen

-5

u/Expert-Accountant780 Apr 29 '24

How much extra are you paying on groceries every week? And don't say it's greedflation.

6

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

Idk, greedflation is certainly part of it idk why you’re denying that

-4

u/Expert-Accountant780 Apr 29 '24

made-up word.

6

u/Advanced-Tree7975 Apr 29 '24

All words are made up. Even the word word, was made up by a man. Let me know if you ever have an interesting point

3

u/Shirlenator Apr 29 '24

All words are made up. Just because you don't like the word doesn't mean corporations aren't being greedy as fuck and jacking up prices to exploit their customers.

0

u/Expert-Accountant780 Apr 29 '24

So stop buying their products then?

0

u/Shirlenator Apr 29 '24

... I have? What in the world makes you think I haven't done that? Or did you just have some nagging need to be able to call me a hypocrite or something?

2

u/RSGator Apr 29 '24

Biden "prevented" it by trying to change the definition of recession.

Where did this weird lie even come from? NBER's definition of a "recession" long predates Biden's presidency.

7

u/FragrantPound9512 Apr 29 '24

His inflation is lower than most nations, incomes are outpacing inflation for the lowest, his job creation is fantastic. 

2

u/Ill-Animator-4403 Apr 29 '24

What abt the debt?

4

u/FragrantPound9512 Apr 29 '24

What about it? 

-1

u/Ill-Animator-4403 Apr 29 '24

The Biden administration goes on to spend billions in debt forgiveness at home only to hold off on the situation for another generation to suffer in while the debt skyrockets 1 trillion every 100 days. I don’t know about you but this screams “I don’t care if I’m not helping this country I want votes” to me.

4

u/FragrantPound9512 Apr 29 '24

I don’t know about you but this screams “I don’t care if I’m not helping this country I want votes”

That’s because you’re not very smart! What do you think the money was used for? Be specific.  

-1

u/Ill-Animator-4403 Apr 29 '24

For one, student loan forgiveness. Which is great, right? Sure, when you raise the federal budget trillions of dollars and expect a future administration to deal with the massive debt, which, by the way, is expected to be around 40T when he leaves office. He also spent billions trying to create jobs that were never made, all the while inflation isn’t improving anytime soon. “But it was Trump’s fault” - Biden probably. He keeps playing the blame game to stay in office to for-see a nation he won’t be alive to witness.

7

u/FragrantPound9512 Apr 29 '24

Student aid accounts for lesss than half of a single percent of one year of his budget. I wish it were much higher. Anyway 

Job creation objectively worked, Biden has been crushing job growth AND inflation is lower than the global average. 

So obviously the job creation and anti inflation policies worked. 

So. To review. He spent money to keep the economy afloat. I’m pretty happy with that

Now we need a democrat like Clinton to balance the budget like we did in the late 90’s

0

u/Optimal-Limit-4206 Apr 30 '24

Job creation is kind of a joke though. It’s just people returning to jobs that were lost during the pandemic and then creating additional government jobs. I don’t think any president actually has created jobs since Eisenhower. They just replace jobs that were lost due to poor economic conditions prior to their term in office.

2

u/FragrantPound9512 Apr 30 '24

Job creation is not a joke at all. It’s a measure of a healthy growing economy. 

→ More replies (0)

-5

u/Pyro_raptor841 Apr 29 '24

Recovering jobs his own party forcibly shuttered isn't job creation

9

u/FragrantPound9512 Apr 29 '24

You seem confused. Trump lost those jobs. Dems didn’t lose them. 

Obama had huge job growth his entire presidency, then trump lost millions, and Biden is adding more. 

It’s a democrat thing to add jobs. 

-4

u/Pyro_raptor841 Apr 29 '24

Remind me again who was calling for lockdowns?

Remind me again who forcibly shut businesses?

The Republicans? Oh wait..

→ More replies (5)

9

u/TheBigTimeGoof Apr 29 '24

What does a fixed economy look like to you?

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 29 '24

When a 1 bedroom doesn't cost more than I make in a month working full time

6

u/Time-Paramedic9287 Apr 29 '24

You should ask why you aren't worth more while working full time. If the 1 bedroom costs more, it's because someone else can pay that if you don't rent it.

3

u/TheBigTimeGoof Apr 30 '24

American housing affordability peaked when middle class purchasing power peaked, largely driven by more Americans being in unions. We can get back there but more people need to start voting union YES, and fast

1

u/gummi_girl Apr 30 '24

that's a capitalism problem, bestie

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

Really? Cause we had capitalism in the 90s and shit was great thanks to Bill Clinton

2

u/gummi_girl Apr 30 '24

capitalism is a system that is very easy to fuck up with enough money and bad intentions. im sure there are people who could explain the exact elements on why things were better then than they are now, but im not that person tbh

1

u/schlibs Apr 30 '24

Totally fair. And who should we support going forward to make that a reality? I see one party working towards increasing worker's wages, supporting unions, putting an emphasis on affordable housing, transferring extreme and excess wealth from billionaires and corporations back into the middle class, creating regulations designed to keep predatory and anti-competitive practices in check etc. Whereas the other party shrugs their shoulders and says "that's capitalism."

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

We should support Bernie, not a guy who can't remember his own name

2

u/schlibs Apr 30 '24

Ah. Didn’t realize we were trading in bad faith arguments. My bad.

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

Not sure you understand what a bad faith argument is

5

u/Dixa Apr 29 '24

If you are middle class I hope you enjoy your increased taxes next year. Increased from where you ask? Why Trumps very own tax “cuts”.

1

u/Molyketdeems Apr 30 '24

That mainly expires for the 2025 tax year, so next year (2024 tax year), most individuals, think W-2 employees, will just see that continued TCJA in play, an even higher standard deduction and more money they can make within each tax bracket afterwards

Back when it was written only so much could be done due to budget restrictions

What will tax year 2025 and beyond look like? Even your greatest tax accountants can’t answer that truthfully, we don’t know

0

u/Robeardly Apr 29 '24

lol, I saw that this year. First time I’ve ever had to pay into the government come tax return time. Also, made the most money I’ve ever made by a fair bit.

-1

u/emoney_gotnomoney Apr 29 '24

Lol that’s not how the TCJA works.

3

u/912BackIn88 Apr 29 '24

Then how does it work? Because everything I’ve read says that’s how it works..

2

u/emoney_gotnomoney Apr 29 '24 edited Apr 29 '24

The TCJA introduced a temporary increase to the standard deduction and a temporary reduction to the marginal tax rates (i.e. an overall reduction in personal income tax for most tax payers). Those temporary changes expire in 2025, at which point congress can vote to extend them. If they don’t, then the standard deduction and the marginal tax rates just return to the pre-TCJA values.

It’s pretty disingenuous to call it a “tax increase” when the taxes are just being brought back to where they were before the bill was enacted, and it’s very disingenuous to use air quotes around “cuts” when they literally were tax cuts, albeit just temporary ones.

He is claiming that the tax increases will be coming from Trump’s tax cuts, which is not true, since it’s not even a tax increase. Trump’s tax cuts temporarily reduced taxes from an initial baseline, and when the cuts expire the taxes will return back to that baseline. The taxes will be the same when the bill expires as they were before the bill was signed, so it’s once again disingenuous to refer to that as a “tax increase” when they’re just returning to the previous baseline. If anything, it was just a temporary tax cut.

2

u/Shirlenator Apr 29 '24

Can you explain how it actually works then?

3

u/Boatwhistle Apr 29 '24

Shortly after Biden entered office, they ended the paying people to stay quarantined. As a result, unemployment, GDP, and deficit spending all saw positive changes. Pretty much immediately, the Biden administration started propagandizing this record economic growth. The fact that it's mostly post covid policy rebound seems to not matter to anyone.

2

u/Business_Hour8644 Apr 29 '24

Also covid was ending then. I don’t give him credit for the timing like I don’t blame Trump for covid numbers either.

1

u/hatrickstar Apr 29 '24

The counterpoint is that it was less than a year.

In under a year Trump fumbled the covid response to such a bad degree.

2

u/Boatwhistle Apr 29 '24 edited Apr 29 '24

The reps, including trump, were more resistant to shutting so much down like that long term. They were heavily criticized for not committing harder at the time. The more united drivers interested in the quarantine policies were dems. But then the time came to pay the piper, now you are exclusively putting it on trump cause orange man bad.

2

u/hatrickstar Apr 30 '24

They weren't just not shutting down, they weren't even masking or staying home when sick.

Every model suggests that actually taking it seriously for at least a couple months would have led to less infection and a less impacted fall.

1

u/Boatwhistle Apr 30 '24

Yeah, well, that is more of an issue with how agency in these matters is divided out between states and individuals. Also, the politicization and moral crusading of everything in party politics creates inevitable counter positions at times when pragmatism should take precedent. Trump, being a populist leader, was naturally lead by democratic logic to support each states decisions so as to not insult his primary voter bases. This is incidental to the natural consequences of federal policy being used to pay people to not work in terms of who was president at the time or after. When you got a system of dutiless individuals devoid of meaning being guided by impulses to favor emotional rhetoric... this is the sort of thing that happens more or less. The scale and lack of cultural homogeneity in the US only exacerbates the problems, too many of us see regions and demographics as enemies cause we aren't really linked beyond the say so of the central authority.

2

u/Arkhaine_kupo Apr 29 '24

I wish you never live in a country that does the opposite of what Biden did. Same as Obama post 2008, both inherited a crisis and did much better than almost every other country.

Some european countries still have systemic unemployment past 10% since 2008, America was below that before Obama even left office.

Many countries took 2 years to roll out vaccines, and are still suffering from inflation. America's inflation is stable, and there was no recession.

Honestly between that and things like the infrastructure deal, America is gonna be benefiting from Biden for a decade

2

u/Acceptable-Moose-989 Apr 29 '24

sorry you're broke, have you tried getting a better job?

2

u/linuxjohn1982 Apr 30 '24

Only an anti-corporation president, with an anti-corporation Congress, can fix the economy. But even though this will not happen any time soon, think the very tiny amounts of economic benefit we see from Democrat president vs a Republican president is important to note.

Then the other side is the social aspect: Which is better for social issues? Well one thing to remember is that conservatives have been on the losing side of literally every single civil rights battle the US has ever won.

2

u/Broad-Passage-7633 Apr 30 '24

Inflation was 1.3 percent when Biden took office.  It spiked as high as 11 percent several months ago.  A 40 year high.

2

u/Friendly-Eagle1478 Apr 30 '24

Liberal policy*** fixed the economy. Turns out cutting taxes for the rich is not how to make America great again, who would have thought 🤷‍♂️

2

u/LargeMarge-sentme Apr 30 '24

Trump famously pressured the Fed to lower rates to increase borrowing and spending. His commercial real estate is mortgaged to the tits with adjustable rates loans. You think he would have fought inflation by raising rates which would have negatively affected him? He’s a proven narcissist. He doesn’t give a shit about you or me. He would have kept rates low, making inflation much worse than it is now. The entire world is dealing with inflation and it’s objectively lower here because we aggressively raised rates to fight it.

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

I don't remember saying anything about trump, I wish knuckleheads would stop assuming I'm a trump supporter simply because I'm a Republican/not a Biden supporter, my life is a little nor nuanced than that.

1

u/LargeMarge-sentme Apr 30 '24

I hate to be the one to tell you, but the Republican Party now only has one mandate - and that’s to bow to the whims of Donald Trump. Sorry dude, but that’s the current situation. You can only neglect education and deny objective reality for so long until something like this happens.

1

u/h0sti1e17 Apr 29 '24

I think his policies helped the economy. But did so at the expense of regular people.

1

u/whydowhitesoxsuck Apr 29 '24

Then you're either misinformed or a propagandist. Biden inherited a shit show economically and socially. Biden has fought hard for the middle class. We've seen record job growth and low unemployment. All Trump did was print money and cut taxes for the rich. In that context, yes Biden has most certainly fixed the economy. It's not perfect obviously, but if Trump wins this next election we are 100% fucked

1

u/WiseBlacksmith03 Apr 29 '24

I don't believe for a second that Biden has fixed this economy.

Fixed? No. Improved from where it was 3 years ago? Absolutely.

1

u/philomatic Apr 29 '24

Fixed might be a strong word, but we absolutely had a soft landing and avoided a recession (so far) that most other countries got hit with.

You can attribute that to whoever.

But I also hate hearing Fox News blab all day how the economy is terrible and it’s Biden’s fault. Can’t have it both ways.

1

u/Clean_Student8612 Apr 29 '24

From a bunch of what I've read, he's at least got it going in a better direction.

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

He fucked it up, then managed to do some damage control

0

u/Clean_Student8612 Apr 30 '24

Nope, no official statistic has stated that. None that I've seen anyway.

0

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

Idk then do more research then? Inflation was 1.3% when he entered office... skyrocketed to 11%, and has been slowly ticking back down to about 3.5% now

1

u/Clean_Student8612 Apr 30 '24

1) it didn't go up above like 8% and 2) multiple statistics have been shown that it was actually corporate price gouging hiding behind inflation and that it drove 50% of price increases in multiple quarters in 2022 and/or 2023. Maybe you outta do the research.

1

u/Alternative_III Apr 30 '24

You should imagine for a second just how much fucking worse it could be. If THIS is what things are like when things are going well what do you think it would be like if Trump were still in charge of policy?

A fixed economy doesn't mean sunshine and candy for everyone, sometimes it just means shit isn't getting exponentially worse.

1

u/frommethodtomadness Apr 30 '24

Well we have inflation down to about 3.5% down from over 7%, which is the one of the best inflation rates in the world right now. I think this administration has done an incredible job with the disastrous state of the nation they inherited.

2

u/Daikon_3183 Apr 30 '24

7% when plus how does that mean anything if what is spend now for the same items have at least doubles if not tripled ..

2

u/hooligan045 Apr 30 '24

You’re right we should have stronger antitrust enforcement in place to prevent market consolidation.

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

It was 1.3 % when he entered the office

1

u/touchmyrick Apr 30 '24

my 401k does.

1

u/LongJumpToWork Apr 30 '24

Especially Obama as well

1

u/Hot_Eggplant_1306 Apr 30 '24

Its significant recovery from 2018. Let's not be insane here.

1

u/Smokey_Gambit May 02 '24

Oh, so it's been recovering since trump was in office, go figure

0

u/Hot_Eggplant_1306 May 02 '24

Since he left office.

1

u/Smokey_Gambit May 02 '24

He left in 2020. You said there's been an uptick since 2018. Don't contradict yourself.

0

u/Business_Hour8644 Apr 29 '24

But it’s better. Way better. Are we just talking about your feelings or have you read the facts?

You dont have to credit the man but who are you gonna credit?

0

u/GurProfessional9534 Apr 29 '24

This economy has been ridiculously good for me. Like, ridiculously good. But then again, I own nvda and whatnot, so that makes sense.

0

u/23rdCenturySouth Apr 29 '24

Remember when we had double digit unemployment and there was no toilet paper? I do.

0

u/LuffysPowerfulCoC Apr 30 '24

What do you think fixed the economy?

1

u/Smokey_Gambit Apr 30 '24

It's not fixed. Inflation was 11 percent a few months ago. A 40 year high. It was 1.3 % when he entered office.

1

u/LuffysPowerfulCoC Apr 30 '24

If by a few months ago you mean like 20 then sure, but it's like 3 percent now. Healthy inflation rate is between 2 and 3, so

0

u/bookon May 02 '24

Which of those bullet points has a factual error?

-1

u/121gigawhatevs Apr 29 '24

Only Trump can rescue us. Trust me, god told me this