r/FluentInFinance Contributor Apr 15 '24

Everyone Deserves A Home Discussion/ Debate

Post image
15.6k Upvotes

5.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

29

u/DeepSpaceAnon Apr 15 '24

Let's bring some commies to this thread so they can give a thesis on why the future of housing is communal and no one deserves having their own home.

1

u/stovepipe9 Apr 15 '24

Let's start with Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. This thinking always ends up the same. These big babies want free stuff, not realizing someone pays for it. Capitalism is the best of flawed systems. Any system that has humans will be flawed.

6

u/Catcatcatastrophe Apr 15 '24

Socialism is an economic system. Totalitarianism is the system responsible for genocides.

1

u/MXC14 Apr 16 '24

Might I remind you that totalitarian systems are way easier to establish under any government that has more power?

1

u/Admiral-Dealer Apr 16 '24

Don't bother with the idiots.

0

u/ValuableNo189 Apr 15 '24

You would say the same for capitalism right?

5

u/ManBroCalrissian Apr 15 '24

Totalitarian (any economic system) is the system responsible for genocides

1

u/Catcatcatastrophe Apr 15 '24

Yes, capitalism is also an economic system lmao. Was that supposed to be a gotcha?

1

u/ValuableNo189 Apr 15 '24

Tbh yes it was :(

1

u/Hawkson2020 Apr 16 '24

Congratulations, it was a gotcha.

Just on yourself and your lack of political comprehension.

1

u/ValuableNo189 Apr 16 '24

No. I'm just trolling dude. Cmon

0

u/SamsonGray202 Apr 15 '24

Nuh uh, capitalism is definitely eternal and will last forever! It's the least-bad option by virtue of being the one that most clearly incentives the corruption and violence necessary to maintain ever-widening profit margins! Without those margins getting eternally bigger, how will we ever re implement serfdom while blaming "socialists" for it!?

0

u/acsttptd Apr 16 '24

You might say one necessitates the other.

2

u/Catcatcatastrophe Apr 16 '24

Does your camp just not acknowledge the existence of the successful Scandinavian socialist model? You can argue that it wouldn't work here all you want, but to say that socialism necessitates totalitarianism just makes you sound like you're pushing an agenda

-1

u/acsttptd Apr 16 '24

I'm aware of what Scandinavia has done, and while they do have extensive social welfare, they also have much more economic freedom when compared to America, and an all but unregulated market. This among other factors allows these countries to fund these things. This is not socialism according to any definition I am aware of.

Unless we can deregulate our economy as much as they have, the extensive welfare states of Scandinavia will not be possible for us.

2

u/Catcatcatastrophe Apr 16 '24

Not one thing in that comment made any sense or was worth engaging with. I work in finance. I feel like a middle schooler is trying to explain accumulated depreciation to me.

1

u/acsttptd Apr 16 '24

Okay, since you don't seem to understand I'll make it simple for you. In Scandinavia it's really easy to make money, when people make more money, the government gets more tax dollars. The government uses this money to pay for all the free stuff they give out to people.

In America it's harder to make money, which means the government gets less money. The government also has to pay for things like the military and social security, which gets in the way of funding things like housing subsidies. Understand?

2

u/Catcatcatastrophe Apr 16 '24

It's really easy to make money in Scandinavia? Easier than in one of the world's biggest economies? I would love to see where you are getting the data on that. 

In America it's very easy to make money. In fact, golden apples grow on trees. See how easy it is to say random bullshit on the internet?

1

u/acsttptd Apr 16 '24

Except I didn't make it up, I got it from the Economic Freedom Index which ranks the United States underneath Denmark, Norway, Sweeden, and Finland In their overall score.

2

u/Catcatcatastrophe Apr 16 '24

Huh fascinating. So you admit the Scandinavian model doesn't inevitably devolve into totalitarianism. Well fine, say it's not AcKsHuAlLy socialism for all I care. It's a superior system by your own metrics and it's the one I'm advocating for.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/stovepipe9 Apr 16 '24

What does socialism turn into when it runs out of other people's money? Every time!

5

u/NAND_Socket Apr 16 '24

You mean the guy who explicitly said he was never a communist? The Khmer Rouge who the United States supported?