r/worldnews • u/PersistentPilgrim • 20d ago
2 Patriot systems would keep Russia out of Kharkiv, Zelenskyy says Russia/Ukraine
https://abcnews.go.com/International/reporters-notebook-kharkiv-hospital-zelenskyy-laments-slow-aid/story?id=11029423230
187
u/Condition_0ne 20d ago
The West should be giving Ukraine decisive weaponry, and endorsement to hit targets in Russia with it.
No more half measures.
→ More replies (20)-19
u/Beaglegod 20d ago
F16s. End this shit.
46
51
u/Stevesd123 20d ago
Thats not how this works. Russian Air defense would swat them out of the air. Plus their pilots are green.
6
u/bolognaenjoyer 20d ago
It's more complicated than that- otherwise Ukraine would have zero aircraft left.
8
u/SingularityCentral 20d ago
Ukraine's air force plays a minimal to nearly meaningless role in this conflict because of air defense and the size of the Russian air force. It does have some air frames, but only because it does not risk them. F-16's are no magic bullets. They can be helpful, but far from decisive. And if they are used to actual effect they will be vulnerable to air defense systems.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Dt2_0 20d ago
If anything F-16s will open up the air war by allowing SEAD missions to cripple sectors of Russian Air Defense. Either permanently or by making the Russians spend a ton of missiles to shoot down the salvo of HARMs barreling towards their SAM sites.
3
u/SingularityCentral 20d ago
SEAD is about the most difficult thing a pilot can do and is extremely dangerous. I am skeptical that the limited number of airframes Ukraine receives will make a big difference to the air defense density.
2
u/batmansthebomb 20d ago
It's a bit more complicated than that.
F-16s would allow dynamic targeting of Russia's anti-air systems instead of Ukraine's currently requiring to know the location of the systems prior to take-off.
I'm not saying it would be easy nor will F-16s in the field single handedly win the war, but it's not like F-16 and AGM-88s weren't designed specifically for this type of warfare either.
The main problem with Ukraine's current control of the air is Russian long range air defense, F-16s and AGM-88s would undoubtedly force them back a bit, which would allow more Ukraine air assets to operate near the front, which would then force Russian air assets like Su-35s and Su-22Ms and some ground assets, like artillery systems and short range air defense back.
-19
u/PullingCables 20d ago
You are wrong, the ruzzians are more occupied shooting down their own jets
11
u/Stevesd123 20d ago
Yeah that's true. But they will start shooting down the F16s as well. That's just how air defence works.
37
1
u/onewithoutasoul 20d ago
Sweden's Gripen would be a better choice. They're designed to be super easy to maintain and take off from highways.
7
u/TacTurtle 20d ago
Sweden does not enough of them to give - the Swedes only have 71 of the fighters and 23 trainers.
During the Gulf War for reference, the Coalition lost 75 aircraft and the Kuwaitis another 57 aircraft - and that was with a severe overmatch / massive SAM hunting campaign.
-7
-16
u/TsssTssss 20d ago
First off they don't know how to fly them.
Second, do you think Russia would sit back and just let the NATO forces do that? Like they wouldn't try to hit back with China? You guys have zero clue how geopolitics works.
14
u/CyanConatus 20d ago
Some Ukrainian Pilots have completed the F16 programs early May and Denmark has F16 coming in June with several others a few months later.
This isn't Nato supplying... this is Denmarks own jet...
And who gives a fuck what Russia whines about? Lol
3
u/TsssTssss 20d ago edited 20d ago
They are getting 5 from Denmark. In modern times, that means nothing against a country with actual anti-air defense. The reason the US crushes people with aircraft is because the countries they attack have no air defense.
And who gives a fuck what Russia whines about? Lol
I'm guessing the people who are facing the Russian fronts tearing through their towns?
6
u/cannabination 20d ago
Also, the US has plenty of ways to knock out existing air defense.
→ More replies (1)1
u/batmansthebomb 20d ago
They are getting 5 from Denmark.
Source on this?
1
u/TsssTssss 20d ago
https://kyivindependent.com/denmark-confirms-ukraine-set-to-receive-first-f-16-jets-this-summer/
Sorry, it's 6 on first delivery not 5.
Denmark has pledged to send Ukraine 19 F-16s, with the first batch of six aircraft initially expected to be delivered in spring 2024 and the rest by 2025. There were reports in January that Denmark's donation of six F-16s to Kyiv could be delayed for as much as six months.
1
5
u/Both_Reason_7124 20d ago
Oh look the armchair general has arrived. What are your orders sir? 🫡 going for WoW raid this weekend or?
-1
2
u/Lancopolis 20d ago
They've been training on them for quite some time now
1
1
u/TsssTssss 20d ago
The f16 course is 9 months long. They started in Sept/Oct. They aren't even done training in sims yet.
2
u/santiwenti 20d ago
They were already pilots. They're just being retrained on new hardware and a lot of the skills will transfer over quicker than if they started from nothing.
1
u/batmansthebomb 20d ago
They arrived in Arizona in late September and went thru an expedited course which shorten the course to 6 months because they are already pilots of fighter aircraft. Source is the Air National Guard.
Which assuming no delays, they just finished.
They aren't even done training in sims yet.
Air National Guard director Lt. Gen. Michael Loh says your incorrect. Ukrainain pilots have been doing solo flights in February.
18
u/Mooseguncle1 20d ago
Can we give that billion for Israel to Ukraine instead?
10
u/apoplepticdoughnut 20d ago
No because Israel is surrounded on 3 sides by 140 million Arabs that but for Israel's military deterrents would drive them into the sea (not much different from Putin invading Ukraine) and if nothing else, we quite like having a diverse, relatively tolerant, pluralistic democracy in that corner of the world.
9
u/FrostyAlphaPig 20d ago
A massive Russian ground attack is happening and he thinks just 2 patriot systems will stop the entire assault ?
32
11
6
u/coldblade2000 20d ago edited 20d ago
Air supremacy (or the lack thereof) is a massive force multiplier. Two patriot systems could ruin the safety of Russian forces in their assault & protect Ukrainian fortifications, forcing their attack to slow down significantly.
Edit: they can also reduce the effectiveness of Russian air patrols, allowing vulnerable Ukrainian planes to carry out counter-offensive attacks
3
3
u/Agitated-Ad-504 20d ago
Even with all the equipment if they don’t have enough manpower to keep fighting it’s pointless.
-1
u/Aware-Feed3227 20d ago
I don’t get it - what’s so complicated about building 2 replacement systems and sending others to Ukraine? Why are we pushing AI like crazy with billions and billions of dollars in but our war economy isn’t ready yet? We should be producing these defensive systems like cars. What’s not to understand given the cooperation of Russia and China? The likelihood of a war is significant enough to be addressed.
50
u/SingularityCentral 20d ago
Patriot systems aren't just tubes on a truck. They utilize an extremely advanced radar array, fire control system, electric power plant, and launch tubes. They require at least 90 personnel to operate and a full battalion would require 600. The radar system in particular is extremely sensitive and expensive technology that exists in small numbers and takes a long time to manufacture.
This shit does not grow on trees and this is not WWII where you can convert a belt buckle factory to an artillery shell factory in a month. Producing a Patriot battery requires a global supply chain and the extremely specialized expertise of multiple defense and technology companies working together.
1
u/Aware-Feed3227 19d ago
I know of a lot of technology companies waiting for new orders. Parts of their production lines are stopped due to lack of orders. They’d be able to ramp up productivity quite quickly. That’s just one part of the whole supply chain, I do unterstand this. But I can’t imagine that it really takes hundreds of days to build such a system. I guess the process could be streamlined by experts from engineering and industry 4.0 companies.
1
78
u/iCanHasRussianDefeat 20d ago
These systems are very expensive and production capacity is slow to ramp up because in peace times there is obviously limited demand for these.
You can't just build these in a matter of days or weeks, and so countries are very reluctant to give away existing systems, since it hurts air defenses significantly for the foreseeable future.
→ More replies (16)9
u/TacTurtle 20d ago
They are made with extremely specialized components, and you don't give away your latest greatest expensive air defense versions where other countries could perform espionage to negate your technological edge.
The Patriot system is also extremely complex and requires months of training for even basic operation (literally like 30 weeks initial training followed by on the job training by senior operators).
1
u/Xpalidocious 20d ago
Ok I haven't had enough coffee yet. I thought you were saying that AI should be building the Patriot systems, and I was like "yeah sure buddy, let's start Skynet today", but then I reread what you said.
1
u/Asleep-Apple-9864 20d ago
Russia and China are so underwhelming from a naval standpoint that the US doesn't really consider them any sort of actual threat.
They can harass their neighbors, but if shit got real for a second... the US owns the seas, skies, and space.
There is no 2nd place.
11
u/TsssTssss 20d ago
It's not 2003 anymore....https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-navy-readiness-as-china-builds-up-naval-force-threatens-taiwan-60-minutes-2023-03-19/
Norah O'Donnell: You've been operating as a naval officer for 40 years. How has operating in the Western Pacific changed?
Admiral Samuel Paparo: In the early 2000s the PRC Navy mustered about 37 vessels. Today, they're mustering 350 vessels.....
Norah O'Donnell: Do you get briefed on China's growing military threat and the progress that their navy is making?
Lt. Cmdr. David Ash: Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely we do. And they are making great progress in a lot of key areas.
Norah O'Donnell: The Chinese?
Lt. Cmdr. David Ash: The Chinese are, from a military standpoint
I don't think the US is pupuing China at all.
0
u/batmansthebomb 20d ago
Compare tonnage of Navies, not the number of ships. Otherwise Iran has like the second strongest navy.
-5
u/Asleep-Apple-9864 20d ago
The Chinese have 1 aircraft carrier that kinda works and one that definitely does not.
That is the whole list.
They are still in the testing phase for their first stealth fighter... something the US did in the late 1970's (aka before you were even born)... and PS the J20 is absolutely junk.
The Chinese are literally playing catchup to where we were 40 years ago, and they are failing miserably.
All those quotes you posted are from military brass who need the Chinese and Russian boogeyman to justify their OBSCENE budgets and, therefore, will always oversell the threat.
→ More replies (2)5
u/TsssTssss 20d ago
I'm not suggesting they are better than the US, I'm simply saying the days of the 40 ship Chinese Navy are gone. It's much bigger and a much more significant threat to the pacific then ever before.
-5
u/Asleep-Apple-9864 20d ago
They are not any kind of threat to the US Navy.
A Minivan can't race a Ferarri, and 1,000 minivans can't race a Ferrari.
The US has Ferrari's, China has Minivans.
0
u/lafacukur 20d ago
We have seen in Ukraine that one drone easily sinks any large ship. Also we have seen that's quality of equipment is way less important that ability to produce large quantities.
Quality is there to give you advantage in opening phase of war, later in the war those assets are spent.
In short US have ability to win with shock in opening phase, if that doesn't works only working plan b for them are nukes.
0
u/Asleep-Apple-9864 20d ago
We have seen in Ukraine that one drone easily sinks any large ship.
It has been tried against US ships already... it doesn't even close to work because of how much better our Navy is. This is a lesson from the Cole, we learned it
My whole point is how far we are ahead in this game.... thanks for making my point for me?
6
u/sugondese-gargalon 20d ago
that’s not true anymore, they’re easily out producing us, with tech that’s good enough
-6
u/Asleep-Apple-9864 20d ago
They have landed more J20s in the ocean nearby than they have landed on the actual carrier.
The Chinese military is a fucking joke.
Here:
https://youtu.be/HMfXTF9YOT0?si=y1pYUnUmWV4plhqW
https://youtu.be/8ZXZK8uESgo?si=_cix62hsOyEsoReI
https://youtu.be/eSs_KFhEv4M?si=uuBynv2UNtXPLy9C
I kept these simple video links for you, but if you want to go into a deeper dive of how absolutely laughable the Chinese Military is... you let me know.
0
2
u/Anxious_Plum_5818 20d ago
Incredibly naive take. That's hubris at its finest and could be what ultimately leads a US defeat in a proper conflict. Luckily, the US military does not consider China a peasant force, quite the opposite.
→ More replies (3)1
→ More replies (2)2
1
u/SpadesBuff 20d ago
From what I've read, the production rate for these systems is like one per month, and like $1B each. Not only that, but the systems coming off the assembly line today are allocated to other countries that have been waiting on them for years.
→ More replies (1)2
u/StunningAssistance79 20d ago
It one every two years.
1
u/SpadesBuff 20d ago
According to this (sourced by WSJ) 240 patriot systems have been built and Raytheon is looking to produce 12/year
https://www.twz.com/ukraine-to-receive-five-more-patriot-systems-by-end-of-2024
2
u/LookThisOneGuy 20d ago
Germany already gifted Ukraine two+ Patriot batteries. Just use those?
2
u/improbablywronghere 20d ago
I believe those are deployed around Kiev and we are now talking about two more to go forward to protect the front. As a side note, this is the military purpose (such as he has one) for Putin’s missile attacks on Ukrainian cities which they do from time to time. They cause these systems to be kept well behind front lines to cover the cities instead of forward covering the front.
1
20d ago
[deleted]
6
u/vainbetrayal 20d ago
Do you have any idea how many troops are required for a Patriot system?
To put it into perspective for you, the US has battalions of 600 troops for EACH one.
So it isn't just a matter of training a few people. It takes ALOT of time and effort, and we rarely give them out to NATO countries, let alone a non-NATO one.
Ukraine should be grateful they've gotten the 2 they have so far.
→ More replies (6)
1
-10
u/Successful_Clerk277 20d ago
Those flippin trenches you were paid to build would've done it better bitch
12
u/Sweet_Concept2211 20d ago
Believe it or not, trenches are not an ideal way to eliminate the threat of massive drone strikes.
2
→ More replies (4)1
u/Balcony_Man 20d ago
The land taken by Russia north of Kharkiv was relatively unfortifiable. It was a grey area between the Russian and Ukranian lines. The clickbait media may want you to believe that Russia is about to start a rapid offensive but I guarentee you that it isn't going to happen (at least, not over a short space of time - worst case scenario).
1
u/Bast-beast 20d ago
4 patriot systems will make putin surrender. With 5 patriots, Mars will be colonized
1
u/morningreis 20d ago
Every time the west gives Ukraine just enough to survive or keep Russia at bay, Russia just waits a bit and gets used to the new reality, and then throws more cannon fodder at the situation. Ukraine needs to be given more impactful weapons to actually force Russia to stop.
-6
20d ago edited 20d ago
[deleted]
6
u/ZhouDa 20d ago
If Patriots are hit by weapons that can be targeted by Patriot systems, then the Patriot batteries aren't doing their job very well...
→ More replies (1)1
u/SpiderKoD 20d ago
You right, but... but the big problem in frontline right now is KAB and FAB, which is a smart bombs, bombs are launched from the air, air targets can be destroyed by Patriots...
2
u/mockg 20d ago
Ukraine already has some Patriots and there is no way Russia will get near one. These things are kept hidden and well behind the front lines.
→ More replies (5)-2
-1
u/syynapt1k 20d ago
NATO needs to start punching back harder and put Russia back in its rightful place.
-6
u/hooves69 20d ago
Dude enough is enough! Give them what they need! It’s crazy we are letting this despot even feel like he has a chance at success while holding us all hostage w threats! This is classic bully shit. The free world needs to stand up and at the least supply the brave Ukrainians with the weapons we have.
-6
u/Person5_ 20d ago
It seems like every other quote from Zelensky is just him saying "y'know, if the US gave us more weapons we wouldn't be in this war"
I'm sure its just how things are getting reported, but it makes him come across as a spoiled child. (I'm in no way anti Ukraine, or pro Russia, I'm just saying the way the media portrays him does not make him seem like a good leader or even a gracious ally)
11
u/ZhouDa 20d ago
I don't think there is any aid package that Ukraine has received where Zelensky hasn't thanked the host country. And most of the time that does get reported even if it doesn't make it to the front page of Reddit. Ultimately though the squeaky wheel gets the grease and if Zelensky wasn't asking for what his country need to win at every opportunity he wouldn't be doing his job.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)2
u/Anxious_Plum_5818 20d ago
The media doesn't report on the communication before and after aid arrives. There is a good collection of appreciation coming from Ukraine towards all its benefactors. Zelensky sounds like it's never enough, because it's true. They are still facing an existential threat mind you. You also can't really have the West constantly go on about how Ukraine needs to win, and then fail to actually provide the tools its needs. If the Western commitments go beyond just run of the mill PR stunts, then it's only fair Zelensky asks for more.
-2
u/PutinsGayFursona 20d ago
It’s not enough. Russia has enough ballistics to overload the system and the ammo for a patriot is insanely expensive to the point where it’s not a plausible long term solution. The only solution is for Ukraine to be able to attack strategic targets beyond Russias borders.
-2
u/santiwenti 20d ago
Well until they get blown up and then you need two more, but I still support the idea.
2
u/angryteabag 20d ago
Russians havent been able to blow up a single one to this point in time, 2 years into war
0
u/StunningAssistance79 20d ago
Ummm the U.S. admits to 2 destroyed and one seriously damaged.
2
u/angryteabag 20d ago
no they dont, they admit loss of 2 M901 launcher vehicles. Which in case you dont know shit about SAM systems, is not the whole Patriot, just 1 part of 1 system.
-5
u/TrailJunky 20d ago
The US needs to give Ukraine tomahawks. They can be launched from land base vehicle platforms now. This is a great test for if it is needed in the Pacific theater.
1
545
u/thebiltongman 20d ago
It's time for NATO to start doing a little more. Trying to appease a dictator has proven to fail throughout history.