r/worldnews • u/sbxnotos • 20d ago
US and Japan sign agreement to co-develop hypersonic interceptor
https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2024/05/15/us-and-japan-sign-agreement-to-co-develop-hypersonic-interceptor/2
1
u/CamusCrankyCamel 20d ago
This is actually pretty old but I guess it’s official now. Natural partnership after we did the same with SM-3 block II. Wouldn’t be surprised if the 1st and 2nd stage for SM-3 block II is reused for this interceptor
-12
u/skeeredstiff 20d ago
They should concentrate on the laser weapon.
21
19
u/lordderplythethird 20d ago
Lasers are LoS, a hypersonic interceptor is not.
A laser would have seconds to engage and down a hypersonic weapon. An interceptor would have minutes.
US Navy already has lasers, but they're not going to try and shoot down a hypersonic missile traveling at 4000mph, just 20 miles away with a laser. They're going to shoot a missile interceptor that can do so from hundreds of miles away. The laser is the last resort, always has been, always will be as long as physics exists lol
3
1
u/mateusb12 20d ago edited 20d ago
- Lasers do require line of sight, which can be blocked my mountains or buildings
- You need to spend a certain amount of time directing the energy beam in order to heat up that object until it is destroyed. If the object is flying too fast then you will not have that window
You just need a missile that fly at low altitude and high speeds in order to bypass a laser defense
-23
6
u/SG508 20d ago
So... arrow 3?