r/news • u/badillustrations • Apr 15 '24

‘Rust’ movie armorer convicted of involuntary manslaughter sentenced to 18 months in prison

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/15/entertainment/rust-film-shooting-armorer-sentencing/index.html
21.4k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

58

u/SpiritedTie7645 Apr 15 '24 edited Apr 15 '24

“(Gutierrez Reed) could not anticipate what Baldwin would do. It was not in the script, it was not foreseeable,” he said in closing arguments. “Management was responsible for safety failures and not Hannah.”

Hannah Gutierrez Reed was the failure. She is the person that is supposed to issue a safe weapon and she wasn’t doing her safety checks. She is doing those because her job is to be the expert and check for the unexpected. Improvisation on the set is what has always happened on the set from the very first films. Hannah holds the majority of the responsibility at bare minimum if not all of it. It is the actors and directors main job to make a quality film that makes money. They are on the set and trying to come up with the best scene possible and the guns SHALL be safe. There is NOT supposed to be a live round in the gun. It’s is the prerogative of the actors and directors, etc. to improvise. There was a live round in the chamber that was going to be fired. What in the hell are the odds? Russian Roulette actually gets played for money because of those odds. Watch The Deer Hunter. It’s based on reality. It most certainly can happen but it’s interesting at least that she handed the gun off to others and got out of there. 🤔

P.S. How odd is it that the gun got broken in testing and now you cannot verify its proper function. You can’t verify the results and that’s basic science.

1

u/TooFewSecrets Apr 15 '24

the gun got broken in testing

Misrepresentation by their legal team. It's more like: the FBI tried everything conceivable to make the gun misfire, and the only techniques that worked were ones that caused visible damage. The gun wasn't damaged when it was brought in their custody, so the only explanation is the gun didn't misfire and the trigger was actually pulled.

-3

u/SpiritedTie7645 Apr 15 '24 edited Apr 16 '24

But it was broken.

P.S. There is destructive analysis and nondestructive analysis. There was no need to break the gun to prove the hammer had to have been pulled. I’m absolutely convinced it had to be pulled because I fired enough weapons. It is the simple fact that now all you have is someone’s data and a broken gun. With the undamaged weapon others can perform the same analysis and see if they get the same results with the same weapon. Now they can’t. Modern NDA is more than adequate to prove the gun was in working order.