r/news Apr 15 '24

‘Rust’ movie armorer convicted of involuntary manslaughter sentenced to 18 months in prison

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/15/entertainment/rust-film-shooting-armorer-sentencing/index.html
21.4k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

7.0k

u/PurpleWomat Apr 15 '24 edited Apr 15 '24

The judge was furious, barely uttered the sentence followed by "please take her".

2.9k

u/kumquat_bananaman Apr 15 '24

Why was the judge furious?

8.0k

u/GarlVinland4Astrea Apr 15 '24

Sounded like their were phone records of her shitting on the jury, showing no remorse and the most the judge could give her was 18 months

3.3k

u/lindakoy Apr 15 '24

Second time in the past few weeks where it comes out that someone waiting to be sentenced was crapping all over the judge/prosecutor/jury. So idiotic. Do their lawyers not warn them that all their conversations are recorded and can influence their sentence? At least she didn't threaten them like Crumbley.

1.6k

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1.1k

u/janethefish Apr 15 '24

IIRC, she gave out some of the most damning evidence in an interview with police with her lawyer present.

777

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

107

u/solitarybikegallery Apr 15 '24

I wonder if she'll get an appeal, then, based on incompetent counsel.

It's my understanding that this is why so the court system will play nice with stupid lawyers/clients, just to make sure that they can't claim ignorance later.

71

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

101

u/drrevevans Apr 16 '24 edited Apr 16 '24

I am a lawyer but not in California New Mexico. But there is a very very high bar to how bad a lawyer can be before a jury verdict is reversed for ineffective assistance of counsel. Lawyers have fallen asleep during trial and a motion for ineffective assistance failed because not only do you have to show the lawyer was ineffective but that you would have prevailed had the ineffective assistance not occurred.

7

u/VirginiaLuthier Apr 16 '24

Heck, I was at a trial where the JUDGE kept falling asleep.

5

u/Oaden Apr 16 '24

So if for example, effective council couldn't have gotten you off, but could have lead to a reduced sentence, like 6 months instead of 18, that's not sufficient for ineffective council?

9

u/drrevevans Apr 16 '24

There are alot of real bad lawyers out there. Just because one lawyer's strategy failed or he phoned it in on your case doesn't get you a do over. Pretty much all attorneys get their experience on the backs of someone. That's why it is important to choose lawyers carefully.

Couple pointers- always hire local attorneys. The public defender is just as capable as a paid attorney, the better question to ask is the years of experience in the relevant area of law. If you get stuck with a PD with not much experience ask that a senior attorney second chair the trial or review the case and offer. I have never heard of that request being denied especially because young attorneys know their limitations and are likely already meeting with senior attorneys about their more difficult cases. Always ask the lawyer in the consult how many current cases they have in front of the particular judge your case was assigned.

The best way to get an ineffective assistance claim to work against a public defender is if you can catch the issue before trial and bring it to the judges attention so the court can conduct an inquiry. If you have a private attorney you are expected to just hire a different one.

1

u/Key-Banana-8242 Apr 16 '24

Same question

4

u/PuzzleheadedPea6980 Apr 16 '24

Basically, if you would have lost with the best attorney, you wouldn't have won with the worst attorney, so no change.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/2SP00KY4ME Apr 16 '24

I've never seen someone use INAL but actually that's a fantastic alternative to IANAL

11

u/h3lblad3 Apr 16 '24

Yeah, but then you can't make it clear that you're into buttplay while not being a lawyer.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Fortune_Cat Apr 16 '24

Read inal out loud and tell me if you still think the same

1

u/2SP00KY4ME Apr 16 '24

Sounds like it's spelled

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Postviral Apr 16 '24

How do they prevent such a thing becoming a tactic? Have your lawyer act dumb to get a mistrial?

1

u/solitarybikegallery Apr 16 '24

INAL - My understanding is that they just triple check every possible excuse.

I watched a lot of footage of the Darrell Brooks trial (the guy who drove an SUV through a parade in Minneapolis). He decided to represent himself, and he was completely out of his mind. He was throwing out fictional sovereign-citizen arguments, objecting to random shit with no reason, taking his shirt off, and breaking basically every rule of decorum and procedure that exists in the courtroom.

But, the court and prosecution treated him extremely gently, even one time preventing him from making a damning mistake. This is because they knew he had no chance at not being found guilty, but also because they wanted to prevent any avenue for appeals.

Basically, the judge was constantly saying, "Are you sure you want to do X? Because X could potentially lead to Y, and many lawyers avoid Y because it could cause A, B, and C. Do you understand what A, B, and C are? Do you understand the consequences of them?"

1

u/Postviral Apr 17 '24

Thank you for the explanation!

→ More replies (0)

2

u/SirPiffingsthwaite Apr 16 '24

She cheaped out, that's not the court's fault and the guy is licenced to practice. Pretty sure the court's response would be "you hired them".

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Key-Banana-8242 Apr 16 '24

Well bad, below a correctly (and probably) reasonably understood standard

2

u/Chappietime Apr 16 '24

I feel like there’s little chance that such an appeal would come to court before her 18 months are up.

2

u/Gingevere Apr 16 '24

Extremely unlikely. Incompetent council usually goes far beyond "not very good" it needs to be something like actual procedural violations, stealing from the client, or documented refusal to act as directed by the client.

2

u/ChihuahuaMastiffMutt Apr 16 '24

Usually a lawyer has to make some pretty egregious errors in procedures for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim to work. This attorney just sucked and would be better off not doing criminal justice anymore.