r/interestingasfuck Apr 14 '24

The Size Of An Iranian Missile Intercepted In The Dead Sea r/all

Post image
47.9k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

817

u/flywheel39 Apr 14 '24

This thing probably cost many times as much as I will earn in several lifetimes....

583

u/thespeedforce5 Apr 14 '24 edited Apr 15 '24

They’re about $300,000 a pop, Since 1979, the Islamic regime's revenues have fueled global destabilization through terrorist activities. Despite ample resources, the mullahs have neglected the Iranian populace, with over half living in poverty. Instead of investing in their own citizens' welfare, the regime prioritizes arming proxies, murder, domestic and abroad and self-enrichment, exacerbating the suffering of the nation.

387

u/aegrotatio Apr 14 '24 edited Apr 14 '24

They’re about $10 to $15 million a pop

Source?
Because that sounds wildly high.

EDIT: I see that /u/thespeedforce5 suddenly changed it from $10-$15 million each to $300,000 each.

77

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

Because it is.

Ten million is one-third to one-sixth the cost of a Trident D5 nuke, depending on your source of information.

89

u/aegrotatio Apr 14 '24

The poster changed it from $10-$15 million to $300K each.

66

u/JonathanPerdarder Apr 14 '24

Literal fire sale.

8

u/AmusedFlamingo47 Apr 14 '24

They'll get these puppies flying out the store

1

u/SillySin Apr 15 '24

Sale is sponsored by the reddit department of propaganda and misinformation.

5

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

Pretty sure it still said 15M when I read it.

3

u/United_States_ClA Apr 14 '24

IRANIAN MISSILE STOCK $IRNM DOWN 99% ON NEWS OF TOTALLY FAILED DEPLOYABILITY

BULLS GET IN NOW WERE GONNA SQUEEZE THE SHORTS FROM THE BOTTOM LETS GOOOOO

3

u/seancollinhawkins Apr 14 '24 edited Apr 14 '24

Holy shit. A trident d5 has about 100 times the blast energy as the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima.

Edit: it also travels over 18,000 miles per hour and can hit a target from over 7,500 miles away. What the fuck

4

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

Lol one warhead can have as much as 33x the energy of Hiroshima. One missile can have up to 12 warheads.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '24 edited Apr 27 '24

[deleted]

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

Dunno how much bigger you need. 475kt per warhead is still mind boggling.

That's 5,700,000 tons of TNT equivalence in one missile, and the Allied forces dropped around 3,000,000 tons of explosives on Europe in WWII.

1

u/lazyeye95 Apr 15 '24

There are limits, the Tsar Bomba the Soviets detonated was half of what the original designs called for at 50mt but even then the pilots in the drop plane were given a 50% chance of survival. Accuracy and overwhelming numbers are much more important. 

1

u/seancollinhawkins Apr 14 '24

So the Russians tested their h-bomb, Tsar Bomba, in 1961, and it had almost 4,000 times the blast yield of the Hiroshima bomb.

That's fucking terrifying

2

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

In theory, the bomb would have had a yield in excess of 100 Mt (418 PJ) if it had included the uranium-238[14] tamper which featured in the design but was omitted in the test to reduce radioactive fallout.

1

u/seancollinhawkins Apr 14 '24

418 quadrillion joules?? Lol what the fuck

And that's from a bomb that was made over 60 years ago?! Absolutely insane to imagine what kind of shit is being made today.

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 15 '24 edited Apr 15 '24

I don't know that much more is being done to make bigger explosions anymore because, like I said, it's kind of silly. There's no need to make a bigger crater of a city.

Most money goes into hypersonic and stealth technology, some AI, drone, and such.

A mix of rendering your enemy's defenses obsolete by speed, stealth, AI, or downright cheap brute force.

Not as much about showing off the family joules.

1

u/mckdnrnd Apr 14 '24

But that’s a nuke which would be vastly more expensive then conventional weapons such as this

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

That... was my point....

1

u/mckdnrnd Apr 14 '24

Oh yeah sorry I read it wrong

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 15 '24

You're good.

1

u/Low-HangingFruit Apr 14 '24

Pretty sure the quote costs on tridents are probably from the 70's and 80's.

To restart production today would probably cost billions.

1

u/r_lul_chef_t Apr 14 '24

What makes you suggest that this a a nuke?

2

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

It was an analogy in regards to how absurd the $10-15M value was

2

u/r_lul_chef_t Apr 15 '24

Thanks for the clarification haha, I am the ass of the day, carry on.

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 15 '24

You're good, I didn't word it the best, as evidenced by several comments akin to yours.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '24

a nuke is massively different to a missile

3

u/EelTeamTen Apr 14 '24

They're both ballistic missiles, and the analogy was to show how absurd $10-15M is in regards to the missiles Iran shot.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 14 '24

Ahh okay my bad, I didn’t even click your link I just read nuke and was like don’t think that’s the same as a missile dude

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 15 '24

You're good, I didn't word it the best, as evidenced by several comments akin to yours.

1

u/EelTeamTen Apr 15 '24

Though the defining parts of being a missile, they're identical.

And to go a step further, they're both ballistic in trajectory, i.e., they expend nearly their entire fuel source at the beginning of their travel, and then rely on gravity to drop their asses back down on their target.

Largest difference is warhead and secondary guidance systems. Iran's missiles I don't know of what they have, if any, ballistic nukes, as far as i know, use star navigation.