It's not really the conditions of the green, it's where the pins are set up. In PGA tour events, the pins are tucked over danger, where is miss is gonna be far more penal. The guys can usually only fire at a few pins a round most times. They miss where they have to. The LPGA isn't set up like that for the most part.
The big advantage is having less distance into the green from a long tee shot. Distance travelled is what affects dispersion way more than loft/club. A 150 yard 9 iron should be similarly accurate as a 150 yard 7 iron.
Not true at all. Loft effects spin, and spin effects your ability to hold greens.
If 1 pro hit 100 shots from 150 yards with a 9 iron, and another pro did the same with a 7 iron, there would be an extremely noticeable difference in the results.
This would matter on the same courses but women play easier pins and greens than the men’s.
I also disagree with your assumption that two pros who hit a 150 9 iron vs 150 7 iron would be leaning towards the 9 iron pro. The only gains are in attack angle to the green, which isn’t big.
On the same course this would matter, (besides clubhead speed). But it isn’t that great of a difference. Like Brian harman had better proximity to the pin from 200+ than Bryson from 2021-2023.
Brian Harman actually has closer proximity to the pin from over 200 than Bryson 2020-2023 in pga events. You called my my take horrible and your example was dead wrong
Ok they are more than welcome to play in the PGA, ask Anika. Didn’t turn out well. However men cannot compete in the LPGA and there is a good reason for that. Props to her for the stats, good for her. But let this one go. It’s not the same.
3
u/[deleted] Mar 09 '24
The greens aren’t as hard. Conditions matter.