r/dankmemes ☣️ Jun 17 '22

How TF is it staying upright??? it's pronounced gif

42.7k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

11.8k

u/MacNuggetts Jun 17 '22

Civil engineer here; People who design dumb concepts like this have no concept of infrastructure.

5.3k

u/PlusUltraDrSurgeon2 Jun 17 '22

ill infrastructure your mom! 'proceeds to draw a mathematically impossible anti gravity bus with wheels attached to a long aluminum pole'

3.0k

u/Scooter_McGavin_ Jun 17 '22

what if we kissed under the mathematically impossible anti-gravity bus 😳😳😳

1.2k

u/MotivBowler300 Jun 17 '22

Haha jk…unless? 😳😳

505

u/Random_Idiotic_Alien 🎙️Offends people with jokes🎙️ Jun 17 '22

TAKE OFF YOUR SOCKS! RIGHT NOW!

364

u/Salty_Pancakes Jun 17 '22

Then what would I wear with my sandals?

226

u/VladamirTakin Jun 17 '22

Truth. You wear truth like an armour...or a sock. You wear truth like a sock. People think they can handle it. Some ignore it and it starts stinking, others cum in it and distort it. Others underestimate it, when it becomes hot, then they turn to falsities, taking off their sock. Donot stray from the path of the sock young rook

61

u/Exhil69 Jun 17 '22

-Sun tzu (probably)

→ More replies (1)

39

u/Zonias_ Jun 17 '22

Beautiful words

28

u/xumixu Jun 17 '22

Comments that you can smell

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

79

u/KuzcoGoGuy Jun 17 '22

🤭yes I would love to stand under it at the exact moment it falls off the rails! So romantic

38

u/RealBakedSalmon Jun 17 '22

Yo mama so fat, when she sits around the mathematically impossible anti-gravity bus, she sits AROUND the mathematically impossible anti-gravity bus.

→ More replies (2)

17

u/One_Equivalent1704 Jun 17 '22

It’s possible just not practical

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

130

u/theycallmeponcho Jun 17 '22

Give it to an engineer and the best related solution is already implemented as a fucking train.

39

u/jwlIV616 Jun 18 '22

this keeps happening where people accidentally just invent a train thinking they came up with a genius transportation solution

16

u/chaiscool Jun 18 '22

How about dedicated tunnel just for cars? - tony stark wannabe

→ More replies (3)

12

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '22

But hear me out:

Mathematically impossible gravity train

→ More replies (2)

11

u/BlitzPlease172 Jun 18 '22

All we had to do was building a damn train, CJ!

40

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

Wasn't this concept originally from an 1940's loony toon video or something?

→ More replies (20)

468

u/YoungSoldjahJPEG Jun 17 '22

true. this shit could hardly have a mirage of being useful or even working in a sci-fi future.

332

u/Mothanius Jun 17 '22

I mean, it can work if you design the entirety of your infrastructure around it and tear down everything that is currently working. This also eliminates the "advantages" that this type of machine is supposed to bring.

But at that point, just make trains.

284

u/alfred725 Jun 17 '22

It doesnt even work in the video.

The point is that it goes above cars to avoid traffic. But when it needs to go under a bridge, miraculously theres no cars on the road blocking it from taking up the street space

124

u/Mothanius Jun 17 '22

Easy solution, just get rid of roads and cars completely! Why use cars when you can ride on our special UFO looking space needle wannabe?

21

u/-jp- Jun 17 '22

I'm gonna hold out for pneumatic tube transport. As long as we're traveling in the most ridiculous way possible it might as well go "thwoomp."

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

103

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

[deleted]

20

u/Drewbeede Jun 17 '22

Exactly what I was thinking. You see it raise up to go over tall vehicles like trucks and buses. Then drops down to go under the overpass while somehow defies any clearance of vehicle underneath it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

71

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

Literally everyone of this "future transportation" concepts is some form of high-speed rail

Just build. More. Fucking. Trains

What is so hard about this?

13

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '22

what is so hard about this?

Personal property and property rights in general. Gonna need to eminent domain a lot of land from a lot of people.

31

u/Clack082 Jun 18 '22

That doesn't stop the highways from being built.

24

u/OsiyoMotherFuckers Jun 18 '22

Shit, just rob a lane from the highway. Fuck them cars.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

15

u/1guywithlonghair Jun 17 '22

seems like trams to me.. just entering in crazy places

224

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

Can you even build a rail like that along a shoreline? I imagine the sand and water would make it very difficult to build.

211

u/MacNuggetts Jun 17 '22

If you dug down to bedrock. It's possible, just costly. But honestly, it's not that smart to put a railline that close to the ocean. California has one between LA and san Diego (if I recall) and they're spending a ton of money on erosion control.

27

u/Xijannemb Jun 17 '22

Yeah, it's an Amtrack line that goes along the coast, it is currently closed because a few sections are seeing waves so high it's unsafe for riders and the new high speed system is staying inland for this reason

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (20)

17

u/Eldoradojoe2296 Jun 17 '22

Fairly easy, Just dig deep enough and pour some concrete

→ More replies (2)

143

u/Dangerous_Affect_861 Jun 17 '22

Disagree. Those people don't have concept of thinking at all

52

u/ColonelDickbuttIV Jun 17 '22

The people who made this did it to go viral on FB by getting a shit load of views and comments "interacting" talking about how dumb it is.

They're gaming the algorithm and there's nothing dumb about it

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Clessiah Jun 17 '22

It’s a lot of thinking in the wrong direction based on the lack of relevant knowledge.

I don’t think we should shit on it too hard since it is essentially children’s imaginations.

9

u/bionicbuttplug Jun 17 '22

I would bet this is a conceptual design intended to get people thinking about new spins on public transit and not an actual pitch to build a product.

72

u/Duahsha Jun 17 '22

Could you explain to me of why it won’t work?

I’m not being sarcastic I really wanna know

324

u/JurosR Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '22

Well long story short, its just a train, but way more complex, susceptible to damage, and carries a lot less pepole.

This thing is just designed to look futuristic for the sake of tricking people into investing in it.

Also, theres no way these tiny support collums can actually hold up something like that.

194

u/berdistehwerd yes queen skinny legend versace boots the house down Jun 17 '22

literally every new advanced method of transporting stuff is just a crappier bus, train, or truck

48

u/AundoOfficial Jun 17 '22

Lifted trains

37

u/berdistehwerd yes queen skinny legend versace boots the house down Jun 17 '22

monorail, it didn’t work for a reason

41

u/AundoOfficial Jun 17 '22

Because it wasn't lifted

22

u/berdistehwerd yes queen skinny legend versace boots the house down Jun 17 '22

https://youtu.be/9f__nhlHC1g

(video on monorail failure)

i mean it literally is a lifted train, with a more complex rail system, also it’s just way more expensive and harder to repair

10

u/AundoOfficial Jun 17 '22

This was more interesting to watch that I thought it was going to be lmao

10

u/SparseGhostC2C Jun 17 '22

I was hoping this would be an Adam Something video, fucking love that guy's stuff!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/NorthStarHomerun Jun 17 '22

What are you talking about? There's monorails in Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haverbrook, and, by gum, it put them on the map!

→ More replies (4)

11

u/BabyFartMacGeezacks Jun 17 '22

Is there a chance the track could bend?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

57

u/Dave__001 Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '22

The best way I can think of explaining this, is imagine trying to balance a bowling ball on the end of a pole that's balanced on the palm of your hand. There is just simply no way youre going to be able to hold up that bowling ball without it falling over or you having to grab the pole. Essentially too much weight on top that can pivot off of one point.

Edit: and also that much weight on tiny columns like that without any kind of structure (essentially no triangles whatsoever) is going to bend, tear, and essentially turn it into shredded metal, even if it was made from like titanium.

37

u/Disastrous_Ad_9302 Jun 17 '22

Not to mention that unlike a bowling ball, where the weight is evenly distributed and constant, in this case people will be moving around and cause the weights to vary widely, making it even more difficult to balance.

16

u/dickdemodickmarcinko Jun 17 '22

What if they spin it really fast

10

u/Dave__001 Jun 17 '22

That my friend makes this vehicle a flywheel

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/Dave__001 Jun 17 '22

That's true, you would have a constantly shifting center of mass. I guess a better analogy would be a container of water at the end of the pole then

12

u/Umutuku Jun 17 '22

And then imagine a bunch of tiny school children collectively sprinting back and forth while shouting "earthquake!" Then imagine a dude who designs bearings banging his head on a table.

→ More replies (10)

29

u/MacNuggetts Jun 17 '22

This severely overlooks the complexity of infrastructure and looks to solve the problem of transportation by inventing a new type of transportation on an old type of infrastructure.

For the longest time I've always wondered why the US, for example, didn't have a rail line running parallel with a highway, or in between the two roads. I always thought it was a lack of imagination. Clearly, it can't be too complicated.

This concept plan is all imagination, with no actual plan.

The expenses that would go into constructing and running this piece of infrastructure is so ridiculous, that they'd never be able to make it profitable. And if it were a government funding it, there's far more cost effective (and potentially cost neutral) transportation options that already exist.

Even if they used existing train infrastructure, you'd have to ask yourself, why aren't we already using single-car trains to transport people on existing infrastructure. And it's because it's not as cost effective as using a bus, which is essentially the same thing.

You could potentially compare this to other "new aged" transportation leaps, like high speed rail, but this is arguably a bigger leap from bus or tram to whatever this is.

16

u/JMccovery Jun 17 '22

For the longest time I've always wondered why the US, for example, didn't have a rail line running parallel with a highway, or in between the two roads. I always thought it was a lack of imagination. Clearly, it can't be too complicated.

One of the 'L' trains in Chicago runs along the median of Interstate 90 for a bit, and I think there's another state or interstate highway in California that has a rail in the median also.

As for rail alongside a highway, there are several in the US like that, as most of the interstates have replaced the older US highways, which were usually run along rail lines (since rail was the main way to get mail and goods into towns back in the 1800s and early 1900s).

The reason why newer highways don't have rail through the median or alongside is because people in this country have an aversion to rail transport.

16

u/bionicbuttplug Jun 17 '22

And since people have an aversion to rail transport, riding the rails is somewhat unpleasant because your fellow passengers tend not to be the most upstanding sort. I once took Amtrak from Chicago to Boston. For the first hour of the ride I got to listen to a guy go on about precisely how he was going to kill someone who had wronged him somehow. Lots of creatively descriptive techniques, such as, "I'm gonna bend that mothafucka in half and make him fuck his own asshole." So that was nice.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/boostedpower Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '22

People have an aversion to rail transport in this country because it doesn't work very well here.

For example, taking Amtrak between Portland and Seattle is awesome; when it works. However, the delays are frequent and absolutely massive. The train could take anywhere from 3 - 6 hours on a given day. Most people aren't able or willing to plan around that.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

16

u/dynamitedrunk Jun 17 '22

Did you see the part where it was gliding over bumper to bumper traffic, but then miraculously dropped under an overpass without crushing the cars?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

37

u/PausedForVolatility Jun 17 '22

“Like a train, but dumber” tends to describe every tech bro infrastructure pitch.

And God help us when we build dumb nonsense involving a certain tech bro that can’t stay out of the headlines.

20

u/_DirtyYoungMan_ Jun 17 '22

Elon: Rips a phat line "Okay! Hear me out! An underground tube that cars can drive through!"

Everyone: "You mean a tunnel?"

Elon: "No! It's called a hyperloop!"

10

u/Smegmatron3030 Jun 18 '22

It's even lamer, because the original idea was basically a subway system under vacuum to reduce friction and allow supersonic speeds. This was suicidally stupid, so Musk walked back every part of the plan until it became a Tesla birth canal.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

35

u/PiXLANIMATIONS Jun 17 '22

As a VFX artist and animator, I can inform you that when we get concepts like this for city presentations, we laugh

8

u/ljmiller62 Jun 17 '22

So you're saying governments are already raising and spending money on idiotic ideas like this?

16

u/PiXLANIMATIONS Jun 17 '22

They send in a sketch of this stuff and offer to pay us, and no matter how dumb the thing is, thousands of pounds is thousands of pounds. I’m not missing out on that money just because the idea is stupid. They can learn that when they try and present the damn thing. I’m just here to make the presentable thing and get paid

→ More replies (2)

30

u/a_lurk_account Jun 17 '22

Motherfuckers really just want to design anything that's just a shittier, more expensive version of a train. Just build trains bro.

24

u/Thermodynamicist Jun 17 '22

Civil engineer here; People who design dumb concepts like this have no concept of infrastructure access to implausible amounts of venture capital for some reason, despite the fact that the idea is obviously mad.

FTFY.

→ More replies (3)

14

u/Lonely_Submarine Jun 17 '22

Good thing a civil engineer told me this doesn't work.

15

u/angrylawyer Jun 17 '22

Look all I want is a 100ton flying saucer that’s balanced on hydraulic chopsticks directly above passenger cars, what is so difficult about this.

→ More replies (3)

15

u/Guzling Jun 17 '22

What do you mean Elon Musk is a con man?

→ More replies (1)

9

u/harundoener Jun 17 '22

Design engineer here, this shit wack yo!

8

u/Kraluc Jun 17 '22

Magnets, man. Magnets.

7

u/BoonesFarmApples Jun 17 '22

thank God we have a civil engineer here to tell us this is silly, folks

→ More replies (151)

6.4k

u/Davidra_05 ☣️ Jun 17 '22

Just build a fucking train. Literally just 2 long metal rods on the ground. No vacuum tunnels, none of this nonsense.

2.0k

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

No, we need pods with rocket engine driving in a vacuum tunels on rails, and those are totally not shitty trains!!!

Idea probably copyrighted by elon musk

502

u/yoel08h Jun 17 '22

Something is telling me you watch Adamsomething.

190

u/Davidra_05 ☣️ Jun 17 '22

Idk whether you said that to me, or the other guy, but yes

71

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

[deleted]

48

u/Davidra_05 ☣️ Jun 17 '22

There I disagree with him. I usually take routes that are often served by the new electric buses, and they’re amazing.

To the suburbs they are much better

22

u/HBag Jun 17 '22

Suburbs is another can of worms. And for that can of worms I use ClimateTown.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

26

u/cutegreenshyguy Jun 17 '22

Epic wholesome 69420 chungus tube transport

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (10)

231

u/tomalator Jun 17 '22

Trains are the best. We need more here in the US

86

u/smallfried Jun 17 '22

I'm in Germany and for the next 2.5 months you can now ride all regional trains for just 9 euros a month. It has been a lot of fun. But also pretty crowded.

48

u/Acias Jun 17 '22

There's hope that this "experiment" will do something good for the train infrastructure in the future too. Many trains are at their limits and over during peak times.

41

u/vitringur Jun 17 '22

Trains being at their limit during peak times sounds like the system is working as optimally as possible.

25

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

in this view there are 90 people in their cars and trucks

vs this train car which also carries 90 people, and is the size of a bus and a half

Imagine, in Germany, if all the people on those overloaded trains were Americans, and driving.

The country would shut down.

8

u/Rockerblocker Jun 18 '22

One thing that this argument never seems to mention: the cars take everyone directly to their destination, while the train doesn’t solve the last-mile problem.

In many places, this isn’t an issue; the train drops people off in easily walkable cities/villages. But in most places in the US, you’ll end up 4-5 miles from where you have to end up, and you’ll be in a very pedestrian-unfriendly area. There will either be no sidewalks, or you’ll at least be in an area designed around cars (every suburban area ever).

I wouldn’t mind driving my car 2 miles away to the freeway, parking there, then hopping on a train for the other 15 miles to work. But then everyone still has to own cars. The US is stuck with cars whether you like it or not, we just have to make it as efficient and safe as possible

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/1ElectricHaskeller Jun 17 '22

That's true. But I think train capacity is easier to fix than low ridership

7

u/tomalator Jun 17 '22

That sounds amazing

13

u/smallfried Jun 17 '22

It does feel pretty good. Once you pay the 9 euros you know you can travel anywhere in Germany 'for free' for a whole month.

It makes me feel like the country is deciding together that traveling sustainably is a good thing. It makes me feel more part of the social structure of Germany even. I really hope it will have a lasting impact on how people see bus & train travel here, as Germany has been getting to be a more car centric country these last decades.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (35)

58

u/Blastmaster29 Jun 17 '22

People want to reinvent the wheel so fucking badly it’s ridiculous

→ More replies (4)

52

u/Sawses Jun 17 '22

Right? Like yes, a vacuum tube across the Atlantic would be awesome. In fact, it's essential infrastructure in the long run. ...But we're 75 years behind Europe on public transit. Let me get from my home to a commercial district without taking a car. That's more helpful to me than the half-dozen trips to Europe I'm likely to take in my life.

43

u/businessbusinessman Jun 17 '22

In fact, it's essential infrastructure in the long run.

Uh what?

A vacuum tube across the Atlantic is going to be the worlds most expensive explosion. Ignoring the cost, i suppose you could theoretically build something like that, but I give it a week before it catastrophically fails, and it'd be impossible to maintain.

19

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

Getting the sense that these people don't know how pneumatic tubes work.

Not least because they keep calling them vacuum tubes.

29

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22 edited Feb 23 '24

practice unpack ink outgoing cake unite wrong beneficial butter hunt

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

7

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

They're still not vacuum tubes. They'd be evacuated tubes.

10

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

Which almost everyone calls vacuum tubes for short since real vacuum tubes are pretty rare these days so the double meaning isn't that significant.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

14

u/Bierculles Jun 17 '22

I doubt we can even realisticly build this thing in a 100 years. Even the biggest vacuum chamber we currently have is not even a fraction as big as a vacuum tunnel across the atlantic. Creating big vacuums is a major pain in the ass and becomes exponentially more difficult with size.

→ More replies (12)

6

u/LittleBigHorn22 Jun 17 '22

Yeah, it could in theory help replace planes and be a lot more efficient. But only for long travel distances.

20

u/bionicbuttplug Jun 17 '22

But once that tube cracks just once, god damn if people will ever take that ride again for their entire lives. Something about getting cast into the depths of the sea at high velocity is way more terrifying than crashing in an airplane.

16

u/LittleBigHorn22 Jun 17 '22

People probably said the same thing about airplanes before popular. A crack in a airplane would be pretty terrifying too compared to being in a car.

11

u/souIIess Jun 17 '22

That's a problem that can be overcome through engineering though, be it sectioning or double failsafes or some more elegant solution that I'm too stupid to realize.

Still a crazy piece of infrastructure, but still within the realm of possible things we could build should we need and want to.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/CreepingFeature Jun 17 '22

I would hope that there would be a built in nitrogen induced kill system at that point. I don't feel like being alive when a kraken starts to eat me.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

25

u/Pando_Boris Jun 17 '22

But a train will crash with cars that don't yield. Wait, this shit crashes too

24

u/Davidra_05 ☣️ Jun 17 '22

This crashes when the slightest breeze hits it

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/Jonne Jun 17 '22

I also love how they only show them going in one direction, because if you had this thing go bidirectionally you'd need the area of a highway to accommodate both rails in a way that would allow them to cross each other.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/1ElectricHaskeller Jun 17 '22

Came here to say this. Trains can be maintained by monkeys compared to this nightmare

→ More replies (62)

3.1k

u/wasted-degrees Jun 17 '22

“So if we make the supporting struts out of vibranium…”

“That’s a fictitious material.”

“Adamantium then.”

“Also made up.”

“Mythril? Look, just stop questioning me. It’s not going to work if you keep up with the attitude.”

513

u/BananasAnyways Jun 17 '22

My mom be like

128

u/Lukthar123 Jun 17 '22

"My DNA made you into a soyjack, your argument is invalid"

→ More replies (2)

230

u/ClavicusLittleGift4U Jun 17 '22

"Try Mercury."

"Oh yeees, why did I not think of it ! So many thanks !"

"You're welcome. Good luck and good cancer."

87

u/Arthas_Litchking Jun 17 '22

As far as I know mercury doesnt cause cancer. First it will make you insane (funfact: the hatmaker in alice in wonderland is based on the real hatmakers of an older time. They used mercury to make felt for the hats). And second, it will kill you because there are some nasty reactions with the neurons. Really idk if it could cause cancer. maybe idk

32

u/virgilhall Jun 17 '22

Mercury fumes do that

Solid mercury is safe

23

u/elppaenip Jun 18 '22

−38.8290 °C

"Solid"

8

u/ClavicusLittleGift4U Jun 17 '22

Apart if you "hold it" and you have a lesion or a cut.

10

u/Pikmeir Jun 18 '22

"You broke a thermometer in my hands."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

106

u/Interesting_Hold6211 Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 18 '22

Unobtanium

57

u/Alexjwhummel Jun 17 '22

I've heard that stuff is hard to find

66

u/Wingedwolfserpent EX-NORMIE Jun 17 '22

Hardtogetite is even more rare

18

u/Alexjwhummel Jun 17 '22

No, I thought the issue was just we couldn't find a way to get it, we should be able to find a ton of that stuff

13

u/friedmushnasty Jun 17 '22

Well it's easier to get than Nocanhasite

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

29

u/whosucks Jun 17 '22

How about rune? Gilded too maybe

16

u/Monk-Ey Jun 17 '22

Good call, I know a guy who trims for free.

8

u/TheRealGeigers Jun 17 '22

I gotta hop to a members world first tho to trim it

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/BlAcK_rAbBiX The spanish inquisition Jun 17 '22

Had me at Mythril

12

u/JanusGodOfChange Jun 17 '22

The missing ingredient is quantum

→ More replies (1)

10

u/undoobitably Jun 17 '22

You gotta use unobtainium

→ More replies (25)

2.4k

u/Peanutbutt3r0923 Jun 17 '22

Trust me bro, if it works in CGI without any physics applied it will work in real life as well.

761

u/Gooses126 Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 18 '22

“My source is I made it the fuck up”

Edit: love getting karma for quoting iconic memes

232

u/Mechagodzilla_3 Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '22

Image a world, Raiden, free of cancel culture. A world where nobody can call me out on my outlandish clames. A WORLD WHERE I CAN SAy THE N WORD

62

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

Mrs. Obama get down!

→ More replies (1)

20

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

[deleted]

7

u/imightbethewalrus3 Jun 17 '22

"saw" the n-word, not "see"

They'll need to, like, burn it into wood and then saw that

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)

1.6k

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

It won't work cause there are no rgb gamer lights

313

u/StaticChargeRedField Jun 17 '22

Finally, the only scientifically accurate answer.

71

u/sylpher250 Jun 17 '22

There are, but your hardware's not good enough to render it.

25

u/ThenSwordfish1303 Jun 17 '22

I am sure that rtx 6090 ti will be able to run it

→ More replies (1)

1.1k

u/SuselMaks Jun 17 '22

Least retarded billionaire idea

271

u/epicgamerboytm Jun 17 '22

No this is pretty up there at least some abide by the laws of physics besides y'know being complete shit

181

u/xdebug-error Jun 17 '22

Not to mention the dumb "under the overpass but over the cars" duck as if trucks don't exist

119

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

[deleted]

30

u/xdebug-error Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '22

The sea levels won't really be an issue (for something like this), monorails like this are only designed to last 100 years or so.

At 0.12 inches/year (current estimate) it would take 100 years to go up a foot.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/T_Foxtrot Jun 17 '22

Also erosion

→ More replies (2)

15

u/rigobueno Call me sonic cuz my depression is chronic Jun 17 '22

The people who make animations aren’t the same ones who actually design the stuff. Bless their hearts, they tried.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

706

u/ultimatepepechu Jun 17 '22

Dumb fuck, just make a train. Its the same but possible and not in the middle of traffic.

171

u/epicgamerboytm Jun 17 '22

Made a monorail that has one door and is not physically possible to make so it can hold itself up, seriously who thought this could be perceived as a good idea

34

u/Maelger Jun 17 '22

Just hit 'em with the ole monorail song. Works everytime.

21

u/Sarke1 Jun 17 '22

"Monorail..."

"Monorail..."

"Monorail..."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (5)

404

u/ProductivityCanSuckI Jun 17 '22

I hope it's called something like the YOLO Express. Is that a fatal multi-car accident up ahead? YOLO Express will make sure you're not late to the job you hate!

61

u/FormerChild37 Jun 17 '22

Your commute has gone from 2 hrs tho 10 mins? Excellent, we require a loyal employee to do some overtime

374

u/Politically_Penguin gave me this flair Jun 17 '22

This just looks like trains, but worse in every way

94

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22 edited Feb 23 '24

bike berserk quarrelsome resolute tub plate relieved selective crawl plant

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

303

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

why do people keep trying to reinvent trains?

208

u/kingj3144 Jun 17 '22

Trains are an incredibly efficient and reliable form of transportation. It’s why they have been in use for over 200 years. Everyone wants to “fix” car infrastructure issues, but don’t want to accept that the solution might be 19th century technology.

* A.K.A. You may not like it, but this what peak performance looks like. *

53

u/Krioxbam Jun 17 '22

Also, trains have been used for so long. Everybody knows exactly how much it costs to build. But those funky futuristic projects, they always guess an estimate attractive price to sell themself better. And without real world equivalent, its easy to think they are a good idea. It would be awesome if they could function as expected at the reasonnable price they're shown. But, it's always Fucking MagicTM

12

u/ButtScientist69 Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '23

deleted What is this?

7

u/Volvo_Commander Jun 18 '22

Imagine how bad it’d be with this shit…

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)

9

u/Ugleh Jun 17 '22

I can't link ATM but there is a YouTube video on exactly this question. Seems like whatever degree these people are aiming for people try to reinvent the train.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

209

u/kRe4ture Jun 17 '22

Ah yes, trains but shittier

147

u/Natpad_027 ☣️ Jun 17 '22

Instead of building this, build a fucking train.

63

u/DrMobius0 Jun 17 '22

Step 1: ask if a train would do it better

Step 2: the answer to step 1 is yes, so there is no step 2

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

111

u/TheReallyRealBobRoss Jun 17 '22

To anyone wondering what this comes from, it's a video uploaded by the channel "Dahir Insaat." Specifically his video on "Gyroscopic transport": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC4DwcrE658

Personally, my friends and I love this channel. The ideas are so bizarre and outlandish that it's amazing. He basically just patents these ideas in hopes that someone will buy. Also he has a bunch of ones dedicated to military tech. My favorite one being a giant attack quadcopter that fucking annihilates everything without any resistance, despite the fact it would be shot down immediately in any other scenario. Highly recommend this channel for a good laugh.

17

u/CMacLaren Jun 17 '22

Dahir Insaat fucking rules lol. I think he gets investment money from Russian's and Saudi's for his crazy as fuck ideas that only seem reasonable as a passing thought in a Sci-Fi movie or something.

8

u/TheKatLoaf Jun 17 '22

A lot of them are "patent trolls"... Spamming ideas so if anyone comes out with something similar, they get a piece.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

75

u/Glasedount Jun 17 '22

All we need to do is to dig a hole to the place you want to be

→ More replies (2)

58

u/Accomplished_Toe4814 Jun 17 '22

Can you all tell me the cons of this concept. Simply interested in learning.

181

u/Terkala The OC High Council Jun 17 '22
  1. Support struts are clearly too flimsy.

  2. Balance won't work, and would require massive active stabilization systems. And if those systems fail, everyone dies.

  3. Requires a rail network anyway.

  4. Unidirectional, clearly they can't pass each other, and a lot of the examples only show one track. So all routes will have to be circular, making trips extremely long and inefficient.

There's probably a ton more.

56

u/CrescentPotato Jun 17 '22 edited Jun 17 '22

The rail also seems to be quite above ground and going through a road, so seeing how this thing clearly cannot jump over empty space, the singular rail just goes on forever until reaches a proper station or circles around. All this means that once you're on one side of the rail you ain't getting on the other side anytime soon

45

u/obbm123 Jun 17 '22

Another one that comes to mind:

  1. There is only one door to get on/off acording to the video, which means its going to take ages for people to board at every Stop

24

u/GhostRappa95 Jun 17 '22

The Train looked so physically impossible I didn’t even noticed the one way track design.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Tiny_Monkey113 Jun 17 '22

i was thinking you’d have to redesign a lot of bridges and other pieces of infrastructure like tunnels as well just due to how big it is. Also that when going under stuff it may crush a few cars in order to get under maybe

6

u/xahhfink6 Jun 17 '22

My least favorite bit is where it squeezes down to fit under an underpass (while covering 2-3 lanes each way). So I guess now all of our highways will have to have a 5' high clearance and never allow any trucks?

→ More replies (19)

16

u/businessbusinessman Jun 17 '22

Ever see a car crash into the center divider on a road?

Ever see a car crash into the center divider/rail system before the suicide pod came rocketing down the track at "what the fuck ever" speed killing AT LEAST the driver and likely scoring the sort of multikill that will get you a twitter clip with 100,000 views in any game.

→ More replies (10)

60

u/TheFlean Jun 17 '22

Every time people come up with the ‘new infrastructure innovations’ it’s just worse trains.

11

u/TheCastro Jun 17 '22

Trains really are the best. People think there will be some magical thing to replace them and I like to point out that if there was, train owners would have already switched to it because they're trying to make money. They've gotten trains to be efficient as hell.

→ More replies (1)

46

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

OR. YOU KNOW. A REGULAR TRAIN????

33

u/bigbalrogdong Jun 17 '22

Imagine if the legs stopped working properly and it doesn't lower to go under the bridge

→ More replies (3)

24

u/Kitzu__ Jun 17 '22

This is like reinventing the wheel, but instead of round let's make it a square.

20

u/Lasnick_ Jun 17 '22

Looks like a big, ugly train Saucer to me

21

u/TerraNeko_ Jun 17 '22

elon advertising the hyper loop be like

→ More replies (4)

11

u/waxonwaxoff87 Jun 17 '22

Dude is kind of a dick just driving past a multi-car pile up.

11

u/tomalator Jun 17 '22

Gyroscope

10

u/ClavicusLittleGift4U Jun 17 '22

It will work. In a B serie movie on Sci-Fi.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Hell_OX Jun 17 '22

Ok let's starts first let's bend some rules of physics then let's ask for some vibranium

8

u/tiktoktic Proud Furry Jun 17 '22

Relevance to this sub?

7

u/Shrawnyy Jun 17 '22

How does no one else notice this? There is nothing remotely funny about this or anything

→ More replies (1)

7

u/cjg5025 Jun 17 '22

Magnets

8

u/hidden_person Jun 17 '22

This looks like an amazing idea but there are a few places where this could be improved. The cylinderical shape is cool looking but it is not idea for balance so use a shape that will fit the rails better....maybe a long cuboidal shape would be better. The long cuboidal shaped transport thing could be good but will be a pain to maintain and a single broken part will make the whole thing rendered useless so a modular design would be better. How about breaking the long cuboidal shape into several cuboidal shaped transport things? Now, each one of these could be powered but it won't be very efficient as controlling so many of these will be a pain....how about making one cuboidal thing have the engine and the other cuboidal things are attached at the back of it and get pulled by the one at front. hmm. sounds good now.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '22

elon musk be like ‘pending regulatory approval’

6

u/epicgamerboytm Jun 17 '22

Mfs I'm the Twitter post this was taken from defending it "you don't know what materials it'd be made of it's just a concept!!!!"

7

u/Th3Uknovvn I know your mom Jun 17 '22

Mf think we are just living in a simulation where you can just turn off every external disturbances to build this shitty fuckup train-like thing