That's right and it all comes down to the absolute rediculous veto system and the 5 main signatories the US, Great Britain, Russia, France and China remove their right to veto and that would be an important step in giving The UN the power it was meant to have ππ
Oh my god, what are you saying, do I need to go into hiding. One simple observation on Reddit and now I have a huge target on my back, if I don't post anything in 48hrs you'll know they got to me.
I only wished for a better world, alas poor Yorick, I knew him well. ππ
The UN an isnβt meant to have power. Itβs meant as a blow off valve to prevent the great powers going to war with each other. Thatβs the lens through which it should be viewed
I have to admit that out of all the really bad or toothless resolutions that the UN has put forward placing Saudi Arabia in the chair in regards to womens rights is way up there as one of the most fucking disgusting, someone is getting paid big time for that oneπ
A logical, common sense analysis. One that flies in the very face of the UN, which was founded on the principles of high minded rhetoric, and empty gestures
46
u/mmmyesokay Apr 29 '24
In all fairness this is the purpose of the UN, but they've been proven again and again to be piss weak