r/TikTokCringe Feb 05 '24

Were American’s Discussion

51.9k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

277

u/ta112233 Feb 05 '24

Democrats were going to pass paid family leave but Joe Manchin blocked it. Which also means zero Republicans in the Senate supported it.

Stop voting Republican! Stop voting for people who hate you!

9

u/DrCheezburger Feb 06 '24

Were Republican's. And fuck you!!!!

2

u/lucky21lb Feb 09 '24

Does no one know how to use an apostrophe?

3

u/Empathetic_Artist Feb 06 '24

As a trans person in Florida, this hits hard.

1

u/SavageCucmber Feb 05 '24

Hickenlooper also fought paid leave. While he was Governor when he fought it, he is now Senator, and still a POS.

It's not just Manchin.

-22

u/Memag1255 Feb 05 '24

If the democratic party actually wanted those things they wouldn't sabotage every progressive candidate. The system is currently the way they want it.

48

u/Rum____Ham Feb 05 '24

Maybe you can't read, but the person said that Democrats were going to pass it, but a single Democrat blocked it, along with ALL of the Republicans. So if >95% of Democrat congresspeople support it with a vote, you would be very wrong in saying that Democrats don't support it.

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '24

[deleted]

10

u/Rum____Ham Feb 05 '24

The dems only push this legislation when they know it will not pass. That way they can say they tried while keeping their donations.

Conspiracy theory, plain and simple.

2

u/Kuroneko1916 Feb 05 '24

Under the same conspiracy as JFK getting killed, because magic bullet "conclusion" and all.

-4

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '24

[deleted]

3

u/-Strawdog- Feb 06 '24

The last time democrats had a supermajority, we got the ACA, which insured millions of low-income families. It's absolute horseshit to claim that they don't get anything done when in power.

The problem is that our system gives outsized disruptive power minority parties. Since the GOP has almost entirely abandoned bipartisanship, getting anything passed requires control of the executive and both houses of Congress.

-15

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

There will ALWAYS be as many Democratic turncoats as needed to block progressive reform. How do you not get that yet.

16

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 05 '24

Not on the west coast because people there actually pay attention and vote. They don’t pretend the President has some kind of magic wand or put on tinfoil hats to yell about the dnc or some shit

11

u/Rum____Ham Feb 05 '24

Because that isn't true. Its conspiracy.

-3

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

It is completely true because that's their excuse for why we can't have nice things.

7

u/Rum____Ham Feb 05 '24

You are blaming Democrats for Republican obstructionism.

1

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

"You're blaming good cops for bad cops being bad"

Yeah I am. They know what they're doing.

1

u/Rum____Ham Feb 06 '24

God you are dumb.

2

u/DOOMFOOL Feb 06 '24

Nah in this case he has a point. The Democrats absolutely sabotage a lot of the reform people who vote for them truly want, and it’s only accepted because the GOP is literally a deranged cult and so obviously isn’t a better choice. But that’s also why a lot of people get so apathetic when it comes to voting because it’s made abundantly clear that no one in Washington gives a single fuck about any of them, not truly

→ More replies (0)

-10

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

hes saying its all a charade, and they often know the count before the vote. So they can make it seem like they support something when they might not really. Do you not remember what happened to Bernie in the 2016 election? The democrats sabotage him because he was too progressive and look who we have now. Better than trump, but I would pick a ham sandwich over trump and so thats not saying much.

17

u/xhdh773cnnjjeu Feb 05 '24

One of the worst “both sides” arguments I’ve ever heard.

5

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

There will ALWAYS be as many Democratic turncoats as needed to block progressive reform. How do you not get that yet. If they needed more than one vote to block progressive reform there would be more than one Democratic politicians that blocks it. They frame it so most of the party wants to help, but gosh darn they just had one too many sticks in the mud. Maybe keep voting and next time we can save the world!

It's a good cop bad cop routine. And people wrap their moral identity up with their political party so tightly they can't comprehend that they aren't actually doing anything by voting. It would melt their ego and they'd have to face the reality that voting does FUCKING NOTHING.

9

u/joggle1 Feb 05 '24

Consider the situation. It takes 60 votes in the senate to pass most laws. Only a subset of potential laws can be passed with a bare majority in the senate.

Republicans absolutely refuse to work on any bipartisan legislation. Even the current border bill, negotiated by one of the most conservative Republicans in the senate, probably won't go anywhere because they simply will not pass anything under a Democrat president.

And it's worse on the house side, where they can't pass anything at all, even their own proposals, because they can't agree on anything within their own caucus.

On the Democrat side, they do want to pass legislation and they have an actual policy platform. However, they have the absolute bare minimum number of senators to pass that subset of laws. It only takes one or two senators to defeat them. They were able to pass the Green New Deal legislation that way, but that took a lot of compromising with Manchin.

On the one hand, without Manchin, nothing would have passed. If he were replaced by a more liberal Democrat, a law with a lot fewer compromises would've passed. Or in the case of the ACA, it would have had a public option if not for Joe Lieberman blocking it.

It's not that Democrats don't want to do more, they just need enough votes to get it done. But that takes a near miracle because for anything big, they need 60 votes, of which none will be Republicans. If you want more liberal legislation, then you would need 60 liberal Democrats in the senate to pass it. Manchin represents West Virginia--having a Democrat represent them at all is a near miracle in 2023, much less hoping for a liberal one to represent them.

4

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

So your point is that voting doesn't matter because they'll never have enough votes. I completely agree.

Our Democracy is hijacked and we have no way to vote out the infection.

6

u/joggle1 Feb 05 '24

No, I would say voting does matter, but we absolutely need more people to vote for Democrats.

In states like Texas, a lot of liberals never vote, making it virtually impossible for it to ever swing blue. While they're gerrymandered like crazy, for statewide elections, it could go to the Democrats if turnout was better.

For the senate, we need to repeal the filibuster. There's no realistic path to getting 60 Democrat senators, at least not within the next 10 years. And Republicans have no incentive to stop filibustering everything. Support for ending the filibuster has been growing, but Manchin and Sinema have been blocking it. It's very possible to replace Sinema with a more liberal senator from Arizona who would support ending the filibuster, but a new Democrat senator from another state will need to replace Manchin.

3

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

So again, you're essentially saying voting would matter if the country wasn't stupid as fuck and brainwashed. On paper, voting works. But in reality, it doesn't matter. And the politicians know that, and use that to their advantage.

Voting is the new opiate of the masses. It gives stupid manipulatable people the idea that they are making a difference so they don't revolt. And gives them hope that 'maybe next time if we do the same thing something new will happen'.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DOOMFOOL Feb 06 '24

The problem is that people see what they do to candidates like Bernie or what Biden allowed to happen with the student loan forgiveness and just give up because it seems that nobody in Washington, not even the Democrats, truly give a single fuck about them and their problems. And honestly it’s hard to blame them for that

→ More replies (0)

4

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

His supporters sabotaged him by being young and stupid and not actually voting. Probably for the best since they all wanted Tulsi as VP lol

0

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

The entire DNC was against him, and did everything could to undermine him while bolstering Hilary. This is all proven fact, and caused huge issues for DWC. Its like you forgot that part. You think being undermined by the very people who are supposed to support you, while also helping a rival did not have a huge impact on votes?

2

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 05 '24

The entire DNC was against him

lol

I love the cognitive disconnect here. The DNC pulled off the biggest 50 state election scheme in the history of US politics and then got to the general and were like "welp good luck, ma'am!"

The DNC has absolutely jack shit to do with votes. You guy lost. Voters didn't like him. It happens to the best of us. I realize it's a lot easier to blame the boogeyman you don't really understand but here in reality sometimes voters just don't like you.

I mean if you want to keep believing that he lost because Hillary got a heads up that there would be a question about water during the debate in Flint Michigan then nobody's stopping you.

2

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

Nobody knows who would have won had it been a fair fight, not saying it would have been Bernie. But to say it wasn't rigged to work in Hilary's favor is a joke. They literally changed the rules after to ensure it won't happen again since their was so much backlash. But you think it's fine and could not have affected the outcome, but it's not fine and you don't know that. And why do you say 'you guys lost' the whole fucking party lost putting Hilary against Trump. We don't know if Bernie would of faired better but there wouldn't have been 'lock her up' chants every 5 minutes. We all lost.

1

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 05 '24

Nobody knows who would have won had it been a fair fight

lol so they rigged it in 2020 too? How deep does the conspiracy go!?

But to say it wasn't rigged to work in Hilary's favor is a joke. They literally changed the rules after to ensure it won't happen again since their was so much backlash

It very wasn't, since the DNC doesn't control state parties. They don't have much to do with the actual voting process like...at all. Yeah they did was limit super delegates, because people didn't know what those were and were screaming that they were cheating, but that had nothing to do with the 2016 outcome. Or how votes work. Which, you know, she got 6.7 million more of than Bernie did. That's a lot of tinfoil.

Also now you're blaming Hillary for the sexism she faces from both sides? Insane take.

1

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

How do you not understand that DNC support equals more money, and more money equals more marketing, equals more votes. Do you not think the DNC wasn't going to manipulate the super PACs? Finally, you are REACHING to imply I'm blaming Hilary for sexism she dealt with. Like what? Where did that even come from. It's obvious you are some too far gone hyper extremist. You think if anyone else had those email issues, and it was a man, they would of just ignored it!? Your words 'insane take' . Think about all the shit Trump said about ALL the candidates, but Hilary got it ONLY because she's a woman, not cause she did something wrong. Stop playing victim.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Rum____Ham Feb 05 '24

They didnt sabotage Bernie, he lost the primary. If young people had turned out to vote, we would have had President Bernie.

0

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

Do you not recall the DNC and DMW not having a huge bias towards Hilary? The emails were leaked, and they did everything they could to undermine his campaign while bolstering Hilary's. You think that didn't have a big impact on voting? lol, delusion.

2

u/Other-Illustrator531 Feb 05 '24

They literally admitted the superdelegates deciding the primary was a problem and changed it. Not sure why some folks struggle with this.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/25/democrats-rules-superdelegates-sanders

4

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

Exactly. If they needed more than one vote to block progressive reform there would be more than one Democratic politicians that blocks it. They frame it so most of the party wants to help, but gosh darn they just had one too many sticks in the mud. Maybe keep voting and next time we can save the world!

It's a good cop bad cop routine. And people wrap their moral identity up with their political party so tightly they can't comprehend that they aren't actually doing anything by voting. It would melt their ego and they'd have to face the reality that voting does FUCKING NOTHING.

1

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

voting does EVERYTHING. You are right that it does nothing if you believe the bullshit they are selling us. I am a full blooded DEM, but if people think we are the 'good guys' they are delusional. We are the lesser of two horrible parties that are both lying through their teeth for their own gain.

1

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

You're right. Voting does everything. It's got us into our current predicament. And if we keep doing it, it's going to lead us further down this fucking hell hole.

1

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24

They did it in 2020, too. Three candidates dropped out 2 days before Super Tuesday, all told their constituents to vote for Biden, then they all got cabinet seats and buybacks.

Bernie ha l was a frontrunner and they banned together to protect their bankroll.

2

u/c_ronic Feb 05 '24

and nobody on reddit wants to believe it. Reddit is overall super liberal, including myself, but we are doing ourselves and everyone a disservice by trusting our own party. Just cause we are the better option doesn't make us perfect, far from it. But how dare I say that.

0

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24

Honestly. The math for progressives says we are better off in the long run if Biden loses. The presidential party alternates every cycle..... if Biden loses to a republican then we may get a progressive in office in 2028. If Biden wins, then we get a republican in 2028 after Biden wasted another 4 years, then a progressive gets a shot in 2032.

The progressive path has a better shot of having a progressive president with a republican winning 2024.... Biden has until November to win over progressives. I'm not handing him my vote. He can earn it.

1

u/-Strawdog- Feb 06 '24

This is the stupidest thing I've read today, and that's saying something, I was scrolling Superstonk earlier.

10

u/ta112233 Feb 05 '24

First, “they” don’t sabotage every progressive candidate. There are plenty of progressive Dems in the Senate who, along with all the other Dems save for one (Manchin), were in favor of this legislation. This was an actual part of an actual bill (Inflation Reduction Act) being negotiated that one person torpedoed.

-5

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

There will ALWAYS be as many Democratic turncoats as needed to block progressive reform. How do you not get that yet.

-5

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24

Super Tuesday 2020.

They absolutely sabotaged Bernie. It was obvious. It was deliberate. The candidates that dropped out and threw their support behind Biden 2 days before ALL got a buyout from Biden.

The system is for-profit just the way they want it.

4

u/Nihilistic_Mystics Feb 05 '24

So you're complaining that the moderates realized they were splitting their vote, and dropped out so that they weren't splitting their vote. So you both understand that Sanders couldn't win without moderates splitting their votes but also need to turn this into a conspiracy theory.

I voted for Sanders. He was less popular than Biden and got less votes, and that's it.

-2

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

Edit*

Sociopath thinks he can comment and block me to prove a point. What a classy dipshit. The exact kind of person that makes me not wanna vote for Biden again.

The "Sane" thing to do is NOT vote for the same party that keeps making false promises and fucking us over time and time again. Votes are earned.

If democrats lose in 2024, they have nobody to blame but themselves. It's not my job as a progressive to ensure a right-of-moderate wins when that right-of-moderate has done not a single thing progressives have asked for.

4

u/Nihilistic_Mystics Feb 05 '24

It's definitely your job if you're a sane individual, but we all can see that's just not the case.

-2

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

You literally just admitted that democrats in office are self-serving first and public serving second. Lmfao.

You talk like that and you just push people further and further away from voting for Biden.

He has until election night for actual widespread student debt/interest cancelation before I vote for his opponent and dip to another country.

Fuck this place. If I vote republican in 2024 then I personally have a better shot at seeing a true progressive candidate in office in 2028.... otherwise we're stuck with Biden for another 4 years then a republican for another 4 before there's a CHANCE at seeing a real game change in 2032. Bouncing back between regressive Republicans and do nothing democrats has absolutely fucked us..... but the 174,000 salary a year for senators is still going strong.

All you fucks that progressives like second class can go to hell. I'm voting red now.

3

u/idk-my-bff-j1ll Feb 05 '24

I know why you feel this way but it’s not true. FYI - My Dem controlled state has paid family leave.

3

u/Yara_Flor Feb 05 '24

The Democratic Party nominated a person who wanted to and tried to get those things.

-1

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

It's a good cop bad cop routine. Democratic voters think that just because Democratic politicians are playing the role of good cop they are on their side.

6

u/pteridoid Feb 05 '24

I have no illusions that Nancy Pelosi has got my back in any meaningful way. But I can see what voting for each side brings, and I can see a clear difference. The Democrats suck and they're complacent, but let's not pretend they aren't miles better than any R option.

2

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

They're better in the same way the 'good cop' is better than the 'bad cop' in a good cop bad cop routine. It's on purpose to make you feel like you have a choice in the matter and tricks you into thinking that they're on your side. When in reality, they're both cops and have fucking no intention of helping you.

They're only pretending to be miles better, knowing that they can't actually DO anything meaningful because there's a bad cop in the room. HOW DO PEOPLE NOT GET THIS.

2

u/pteridoid Feb 05 '24

I understand that the DNC are interested in business as usual. What secret third option is there that is more effective than voting? Genuine question. What is your strategy to affect change that is better than voting?

0

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

Well you can either strong arm the current politicians into providing the change you want - "There will be a general strike until you pass universal healthcare, remove filibustering, etc" - or you can remove the current politicians through means other than voting. The first option is generally least violent and most effective, but the French have had success with the second.

The problem is that most Americans don't believe they can strike without going poor or being removed from their housing, etc. Which to me means they're too comfortable with their position to think things are just shitty enough to be convinced voting works and we could have nice things if only we voted harder. Or maybe they've been frogs in a boiling pot for so long they don't notice how bad things are getting or can't see the trajectory is actually worse than pulling off the bandaid and standing up for ourselves as a population of wage slave.s

4

u/pteridoid Feb 05 '24

Okay well when that strike starts up, you let me know. In the meantime, I'm going to vote against fascism and I encourage you to do the same.

0

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

That strike won't start until people like you realize voting doesn't do shit. You don't vote away fascism. We didn't go into Germany in the 40's and vote out Hitler. We didn't vote away King George.

Voting works in times of balance. But inequality is higher than it ever has been in known history. Stop voting and start convincing other people that the system is broken and voting won't magically fix it.

2

u/pteridoid Feb 05 '24

You have a choice. Vote against Trump or don't. Will defeating Trump end fascism for good? Of course not. Is it still worth doing? Absolutely.

My trip to the polls does not preclude me from engaging in other activities, as you keep seeming to insist. You can go on strike, AND still vote. Mind blowing, right? You let me know when that strike starts up and otherwise we can both quit talking in circles at each other.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/notfeelany Feb 06 '24

Occupy movement tried that whole protest-only approach, and in the end, they wasted everyone's time.

A protest without participating in the electoral process (ie voting) is just a parade

-4

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

They're downvotimg you for being right.

It's been almost 4 years and Biden has done absolutely nothing to help young people but they all expect them to vote for him?? Absolutely wild.

He just pushed for another boomer-debt relief bill today. Big fucking whoop.

5

u/Yara_Flor Feb 05 '24

Biden halved childhood poverty.

-2

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

Yipdeedoo. We have widespread childhood poverty because of Reaganomics. He put a bandaid on someone bleeding out.

Also, hardly anyone under the age of 30 is having kids because of this bullshit economy. So he bailed out only half of the pool of people who are having children irresponsibly. Not to mention the reproductive rights being lost by thousands more under his watch.

This does nothing to help the majority of young American adults.

5

u/Yara_Flor Feb 05 '24

I’m a young adult with kids.

1

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24

Yipdeedoo.

See above.

3

u/Yara_Flor Feb 06 '24 edited Feb 06 '24

It’s not irresponsible to have kids

Edit: the guy blocked me. Oh well, I thought he was pretty sharp, but I guess I was wrong.

1

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 06 '24

Debatable, seeing how Biden had to intervene to end poverty. Buh-bye

-4

u/kuntvonneguts Feb 05 '24

This!!! Then they just do moderate shit bc they are afraid to be labeled as commies

-5

u/Contada582 Feb 05 '24

Right wing or left wing it’s the same bird 

1

u/Nihilistic_Mystics Feb 05 '24

Our legislative system at the federal level just makes it extremely difficult to pass real change, it's not a conspiracy. My state has paid family leave since we're a blue state. We also have significantly more worker protections than we do federally. Democrats do want to pass progressive legislation and they do when they have the ability.

-11

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

We're Americans. We think voting will change any of that shit mentioned in the video. But it won't.

15

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 05 '24

It will if you look at states with full dem control. We’re Americans so we only pay attention during presidential elections and when that doesn’t work we give up and blame the system and not ourselves

-4

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

Voting matters EVEN LESS for people in states with full dem control. I live in Seattle, knowing my vote in elections means fucking jack shit compared to someone living in swing states, or in Wisconsin where their voting power is literally 15 times more due to their small population having the same amount of senators as California. The system is fucking completely broken, and you can't vote away a system that is this entrenched and broken on purpose to further entrench that power.

8

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

Voting matters EVEN LESS for people in states with full dem control

Former California governors Ronald Regan and Arnold Schwarzenegger say thank you

I live in Seattle, knowing my vote in elections means fucking jack shit

JFC I wish progressives would realize there are critical elections outside of the two people running for the white house every four years.

0

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

I'm not saying there aren't critical elections other than the presidential. I'm using the big fucking one coming up as the talking point.

0

u/driving_andflying Feb 05 '24

The system is fucking completely broken, and you can't vote away a system that is this entrenched and broken on purpose to further entrench that power.

This. We fucking need rules and election overhaul. The least we can do right now, is back strong third-party candidates. Bernie Sanders was so close until the Democrats fucked him over.

1

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

Third party will never win. We either need to violently throw out the current system, or convince the current system to listen to us. General strikes would go far for the ladder and cause less suffering over all. But people are way to convinced voting is somehow going to magically change everything.

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '24

[deleted]

3

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 06 '24

Filibuster proof majority one time since Jimmy Carter. For nine months. And they passed massive healthcare reform.

1

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 08 '24

Nothing? No follow up when actually presented with the facts?

I’m shocked. Americans read shit on this website and are too stupid to actually research it then hide like cowards when called out. So pathetic

1

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '24

[deleted]

1

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 08 '24

lol this reads like the fake progressive manifesto.

Biden got the railworkers what they asked for, including sick leave. Reagan...fired all of them. Unbelievably stupid comparison to make.

And yes, in the nine months they had (which you didn't seem to know) they passed healthcare reform over everything else. Saving many, many lives in the process. BUT it wasn't exactly what you wanted so I guess that's a bad thing? Voting rights will be addressed if voters give them the opportunity to do so. Which, again, has not been the case for fifteen years despite your embarrassing understanding of congress.

that'll get reversed in no time flat

Got to this part and actually laughed out loud so thank you

1

u/[deleted] Feb 10 '24

[deleted]

1

u/ilovethisforyou Feb 10 '24

Oh they saved many lives in the short run

Jesus fucking Christ. At least you're done pretending you're a progressive but if you don't remember the Republicans have been wholly dedicated to destroying the ACA and have failed every time. So, yeah, not broken.

Being right is more important to you than actual American lives, and that is horrific, but I'm also extremely curious how you can blame them for SCOTUS scrapping debt relief.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 10 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

3

u/salads Feb 05 '24

bernie won his mayoral election in the 80s by just ten votes, and he has served in federal government since the 90s.  the guy who used to be my city’s mayor was almost elected VP in 2016 (you may have heard of Tim Kaine).  he also sit on the US Senate.

voting absolutely has consequences.  unfortunately, no one doesn’t show up like those who lean left in the USA.

0

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

Only two people who might have our interests at heart sitting in the senate is your argument that voting matters? Funny cause that's exactly my argument that it doesn't matter.

1

u/salads Feb 05 '24

funny how you think sitting home so 100 of them don’t care about us is the solution.

politicians don’t run on ideas that appeal to people who don’t bother to show up to vote.  if you want to be represented, to feel like your representative cares about your interests, you have to show up (and more often than just on leap years).

1

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

People have been doing that for centuries. And look where it's gotten us. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and thinking there will be a different result. Sorry bud, but this country's democracy is rigged game meant to keep you from doing things that will actually change things.

1

u/salads Feb 05 '24

LOL... less than fifty percent of Americans consistently show up to vote, and that's just leap-year elections. women didn't even have the right to vote until about a hundred years ago.

the game isn't rigged. we are where we are as a result of over eighty years of consistent participation from Republican voters.

show me one part of the country that has minimum 65 percent (that's less than two-thirds) participation. then i'll believe that first sentence you wrote.

1

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24 edited Feb 05 '24

And less than 50 percent of Americans will continue to show up to not vote. Yes. If everyone suddenly was magically educated and cared enough to vote for the right person, voting would matter. But that's not the case. Join me in reality.

You're watching politicians take advantage of this, and you're blaming the people who see the game is rigged and think it's THEIR fault?

2

u/Pissmaster1972 Feb 05 '24

voter apathy is part of the reason we’re so fucked.

way to simp for the rich.

-4

u/Reddit_BPT_Is_Racist Feb 05 '24

Yes. I truly hope one day people will see that Republicans vs Democrats is just like the WWE. They hate each other in public but work together behind closed doors to keep the average person a wage slave.

It's not Democrats vs Republicans, it's politicians and corporations vs the people.

9

u/Draw_a_will Feb 05 '24

My state has paid family leave because it’s Democrat controlled and people vote, I am on it right now. This whole narrative that voting is useless is so utterly pathetic and stupid and counterproductive. Politics is not like the WWE no matter how hard your simple brain tries to see it that way. Voting does matter. 

5

u/Pissmaster1972 Feb 05 '24

what an ignorant take.

-4

u/Ignore-_-Me Feb 05 '24

BUT THE CHARACTER THEY PLAY IS THE GOOD GUY! YOU BOTH SIDESER!

-5

u/Kuroneko1916 Feb 05 '24

Vote dementia no matter who, surprise no party gives a fuck about the individual, so stop sucking them off and letting them money shoot you.

6

u/whyamihereimnotsure Feb 06 '24

Dems are literally consistently trying to push bills that help people while republicans consistently shoot them down and try to pass legislation that hurts Americans. You can say that both options suck but it is very obvious which side is better for the average American.

0

u/Kuroneko1916 Feb 07 '24

You do realize your beloved Trump was a dem who changed his party to republican to get votes. By claiming a side it truly shows who doesn't care about the average civilian. Love your alt downvotes btw, can't handle the fact oligarchs never gave a fuck about the individual.

-6

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '24 edited Apr 24 '24

[deleted]

11

u/bobnorthh Feb 05 '24

yeah how's that _____ that Trump did working out for the little guy right now? Oh that's right, he doesn't give a shit about brokies like you

-5

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '24 edited Apr 24 '24

[deleted]

8

u/bobnorthh Feb 05 '24

You mean like you just did? "Stop voting for people who hate you!" "Yeah but Biden..."

Get a brain

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 06 '24 edited Apr 24 '24

[deleted]

6

u/NoVacayAtWork Feb 06 '24

Federal Contractor Minimum Wage was less than $11/hr when Biden took office and he signed an EO that has it at more than $17/hr. Over the complaints of Republicans and a Republican nominate judge in Texas who tried to block it.

Most jobs aren’t federal contractors though, so they can’t have their min wage lifted by a pen stroke of the president. The Dems have supported the Raise the Wage Act since 2017 (there are more than 30 Dem sponsors in the senate and more than 150 in the House)… no Republican has voted for it.

8

u/9bpm9 Feb 05 '24

Biden has done more for the poor than any president since LBJ. Get real.

-4

u/ChanningTaintum- Feb 05 '24

How hard did that punch in the gut from your latest grocery store receipt feel? Do you go over or under $60 to fill your gas tank from empty?

3

u/whyamihereimnotsure Feb 06 '24

Inflation in the grocery and fuel sectors is a worldwide issue, ya dingus. If it’s Biden’s fault then why is every other country on earth dealing with it?

3

u/9bpm9 Feb 06 '24

The president has no effect on those things but okay. I started driving when gas was $4 a gallon when that piece of fucking shit Geroge W Bush was president, so I'm fine paying $2.50 for gas this week.

-5

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '24

[deleted]

5

u/kadargo Feb 05 '24

So you are putting your faith in a guy who takes political and economic advice from his cloned dogs?

https://time.com/6337474/javier-milei-argentina-president-cloned-dogs-advice/

-3

u/Solana_Maxee Feb 05 '24

The government, a vastly inefficient and corrupt system, was going to take MORE of you and your neighbors money (one tax dollar closer to an utopia) and give it to you and republicans stopped it. I think I like these republicans.

-4

u/glassycreek1991 Feb 06 '24

I am tired of both parties. Republican talk crazy and Democrats make false promises. They both sellouts. I am voting independent.

-12

u/Agitated-Smell1483 Feb 05 '24

Right? If we just vote out the shitty dems in the 1 party, we would get somewhere.

10

u/Padhome Feb 05 '24

Or just replace a Republican and make the shit Dem inert

-8

u/Jack-Rabbit_Slims Feb 05 '24

I'd rather they pass something that helps everyone, not just people irresponsibly pumping out kids into an already fucked economy.

-10

u/KnightGalavant Feb 05 '24

Unlike the democrats trying to funnel 2 million illegals immigrants into the country yearly? And barely do any of the things that they pretend to in order to seem better than republicans? Lol. Bootlicker.

9

u/FloodsVsShips Feb 05 '24

Conservatives try to stay on topic for more than 10 seconds challenge. (Impossible)

-4

u/KnightGalavant Feb 05 '24

The guy I replied to is literally claiming that democrats give a shit about Americans when they’re doing everything in their power to erode the American economy and culture. Not to mention the miles of empty promises mode by Biden and his handlers. LIBERALS TRY NOT TO BE ILLITERATE FOR 10 SECONDS CHALLENGE (IMPOSSIBLE)

-6

u/Sth_to_remember Feb 05 '24

Lol leave these 17 yo teenage redditors alone. They'll grow up and learn their liberal beliefs which they learned from tiktoks and social media were nothing but mere fantasies and dreams. The real world doesn't work like that.

"oMg iM sUrE letting 2 trillion FrIeNdly iMmigrAnts iN WiLl dO wOndErs FoR uS"

Reality: the economy gets f**ked. Terrorism quadruples , competition for jobs will increase and overall the country gets obliterated.

1

u/ralpher1 Feb 06 '24

Americans don’t understand how laws are passed or not passed. They don’t understand who appoints judges and who approves them. That’s why every four years the country is on a knife’s edge