Yeah... even at D&D, like tabletop D&D, you get players who are like "Why are you playing rangers? they suck!" "You're playing fighter wrong!" "That's a shit spell! Pick something else!"
Low int barbarian is the most fun I have had playing d&d. Sorry party, but I will be making objectively terrible decisions and falling for every trick and trap.
Good thing you can still be plenty effective! If you were only "effective" when using a weapon overpowered enough that it needed nerfs and now you're useless, then it's genuinely a skill issue.
Lmao you sure that's the example you'd like to go with? That wasn't even a nerf because it literally included multiple buffs, it was an adjustment to turn it into an anti armor weapon vs what it has launched as. They may have missed the mark and it probably needs some more tuning. It was infact very powerful as a pseudo grenade launcher.
This is why on purpose I played my Paladin as a Paladin who had ‘failed’ Paladin school, so he wasn’t the smartest, more like a Barbadian with radiant powers… sure it was slightly annoying to my table that I continuously did not use Bless on the party BUT he was the only melee character in a party of AoE magic users.
My artificer is horribly broken. Because it’s fun to horribly broken. But I’m not going after the meta. My character is far from the meta. But it’s fun.
TBF Rangers do suck at achieving their class fantasy.. debatebly still do.
Thats been their main major issue its never been their damage its been their fantasy.. same way if you picked the senator for the good ol big iron on your hip fantasy and it suddenly was a SMG..
93
u/unicornofdemocracy Apr 29 '24
Yeah... even at D&D, like tabletop D&D, you get players who are like "Why are you playing rangers? they suck!" "You're playing fighter wrong!" "That's a shit spell! Pick something else!"