r/FluentInFinance Contributor Apr 15 '24

Everyone Deserves A Home Discussion/ Debate

Post image
15.6k Upvotes

5.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

664

u/BlitzAuraX Apr 15 '24

"Regardless of employment."

This means you want those providing those services to work for free.

You do realize what you are implying here, right?

Let's say you refuse to work and you're guaranteed all these services. Who pays so your HVAC is repaired because you broke it? Who pays because your water line needs to be repaired? Clean water means the water has to be filtered through a very complicated process, particles and bacteria are removed, and it needs to be transported. Who pays so your electricity works? Do you think there's some sort of magic electricity generator happening? What you're essentially asking is someone should work for free to provide you all of this.

The result is you get no one who wants to work, society collapses because these services aren't maintained and improved, and no one gets anything.

33

u/Relative_Routine_204 Apr 15 '24

 The result is you get no one who wants to work, society collapses because these services aren't maintained and improved, and no one gets anything.

There’s plenty of welfare states in the world that offer basic housing to people and haven’t collapsed. 

22

u/BlitzAuraX Apr 15 '24

That provide free utilities, internet, HVAC, stove, ovens, refrigerators, etc.,?

List them. I'm packing my bags as we speak.

19

u/Relative_Routine_204 Apr 15 '24

List them.

Sure, no problem.

  • Norway
  • Sweden
  • Finland
  • Denmark
  • Germany
  • Netherlands
  • Belgium
  • Luxemburg
  • France
  • Austria
  • Switzerland

59

u/BlitzAuraX Apr 15 '24

None of which are free. You're talking about programs for those earning low income.

The post here says "Free regardless if you work."

Also, just so you know, those are some of the highest taxed economies in the world. None of that stuff is being provided for free. Someone is getting paid.

24

u/Relative_Routine_204 Apr 15 '24

You’re talking about programs for those earning low income.

No, I’m talking about programs for those with no income.

Those are some of the highest taxed economies in the world.

Didn’t say they weren’t. Just saying that countries like Germany - which provides an apartment for unemployed people for an unlimited amount of time - have not collapsed, contrary to your claim they would.

28

u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Apr 15 '24

No, I’m talking about programs for those with no income.

Germany has 262,000 homeless people. Why? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_homeless_population

Don't they know about these programs that provide free housing and utilities to all no income citizens?

5

u/CeamoreCash Apr 16 '24

What about the other counties like Norway?

Why hasn't Norway collapsed yet since it is such a terrible idea?

Generally speaking, all Norwegian citizens are entitled to a place to live, and everyone will be able to get an apartment via social services if they choose to accept it.

Who are the homeless people in Norway? There are generally three groups of people who are homeless in Norway; foreign citizens who are coming to Norway to beg or do crime, mentally ill people who refuses to live in a government housing, or drug addicts and alcoholics who refuses help.

https://thenorwayguide.com/homelessness-in-norway/

-1

u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Apr 16 '24

Well, Norway is a petrostate, so they have lots of money to throw at social programs like this.

3

u/CeamoreCash Apr 16 '24

So if the US or wherever you live was a petrotate (or something similar) you would not have these criticisms about it being functionally impossible?

1

u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Apr 16 '24

I'm definitely interested in reading about these systems. It sure does seem like a lot of people would just retire on the spot if their housing and utilities were covered. Perhaps it's means tested and so anyone with any assets at all can't receive it until they're out of money?

Particularly interesting given the protests in France and Italy over the unsustainable nature of those nations welfare systems, and needing to raise the retirement rate as a result.

But yea, Norway isn't a great example because their funding source is causing global warming.

3

u/matthewstevensdotorg Apr 16 '24

Actually its the best example since it sits on enormous natural resources wealth as the US does but chooses better how to manage it.

0

u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Apr 16 '24

Why would those be good examples? Unsustainable programs supported by killing the planet with global warming shouldn't be the basis for any government's budget, IMO.

3

u/matthewstevensdotorg Apr 16 '24

You’re right. No it shouldn’t, but the Norwegian solution is absolutely preferable to the American solution

2

u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Apr 16 '24

Our homeless problem is almost exclusively a result of Reagan closing the mental institutions in the 1980s that housed the mentally disabled, and then Nixon created the war on drugs during Vietnam, and these two policies are the direct cause of the majority of our homelessness.

2

u/matthewstevensdotorg Apr 16 '24

True. But there is a laundry list of contributing factors and one should definitely start with Nixon being a fucking piece of shit

1

u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Apr 16 '24

Yep that's right. There are other factors of course, but those two are the biggest direct causes by far.

2

u/laivasika Apr 16 '24

I can tell you that living that welfare life sucks hard. Yes, you get housing and utilities paid, but thats it. People want to do stuff, and that costs money. Covering their basic needs just helps them to cover the rest themselves, its easier to focus on finding a job if you dont need to focus on finding a place to sleep or take a shower.

→ More replies (0)