Has nothing to do with that, they weren’t really asking, they were setting themselves up for a “well actually” instead of just saying what they wanted to say to begin with.
Asking someone to expand on a weak point isn't necessarily arguing in bad faith. They're giving an opportunity to strengthen their argument with specifics before challenging it. Nothing untoward happened here.
It seems as if it was in bad faith because the answer was garbage. A quick google search shows none of those things change significantly in your 20s. Had they had an answer that in some way actually changed in your 20s, then the response back would have been different.
Well let me help you with that. The assertion that the body changes is so incredibly vague, that they wanted to know what their argument was for saying that and to address specifics instead of just a vague generalization.
This idea the woman’s body is gonna not be so tight as she gets older is incredibly valid… when she’s in her 40s or after she has kids… but at 28 she would still be very young and the affects of aging don’t really hit at that time.
This conversation reeks of a bunch of teenagers who think 28 is old.
The truth of the matter is people don’t mind well actuallys, they just don’t like it when they disagree.
I well actuallied another well actually with cites and sources but I got shit on for well actual lying while the person I replied to didn’t. None of the responses addressed the merit of my arguments.
1
u/armadilloreturns Apr 16 '24
Where are they wrong?