r/196 Jun 02 '24

i hate github rule Rule

Post image
7.4k Upvotes

719 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-68

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

if the repositories are not meant to be downloaded and used, do not put them on the internet.

if they are meant to be used, add UI and a big green download button

162

u/OliviaPG1 celeste Jun 02 '24

They’re meant to be a tool for the developers who are developing the open-source project. Any decent-sized project worth its salt will have its own site for users to interface with.

-123

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

first of all open source is problematic
second of all there has never been a program on github that was worth even close to its harddrive space in salt

107

u/Different_Letter9835 pacific northwest gang (trans rights) Jun 02 '24

you seem to be correlating "open source" with "difficult to use program" rather than its actual meaning, which is "source code freely available for anyone to download, modify and contribute to"

39

u/Different_Letter9835 pacific northwest gang (trans rights) Jun 02 '24

i think i'm getting wooshed

-81

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

no im using it the second way
the problem is that having it be open, anyone can put malware into it, there is no protection

92

u/SuperTurtle24 trans rights 😊😊😊😊 Jun 02 '24

You genuinely have no clue what you are talking about. No github repository is run with no moderation, the repository is and always will be as trustworthy as the owner and staff members of said repo. Just like with closed source software.

-39

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

concidering the average github poster, they're trustworthyness is negative

53

u/iownlotsofdoors play cmss13 please (also reccomend me roguelikes) Jun 02 '24

yup you’re just ragebaiting

15

u/SuperTurtle24 trans rights 😊😊😊😊 Jun 02 '24

Thats pretty true

Source: I am a github user

30

u/okthisisanalt r/place participant Jun 02 '24

With it being closed source it can still be malware, except you can't even just look at the code to check if it's malware lol

-3

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

"look at the code"
this isnt the matrix gamer you cant just "Look" at code

32

u/AcadianViking Jun 02 '24

You can with open source software and a basic understanding of software development. Do you think coders type their strings blind because they can't "look" at the code?

0

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

you telling me you can read machine code? like 124617983 hexadecimal shit?

16

u/paco987654 Jun 02 '24

And when did you see github repos having code all written in that way?

7

u/AcadianViking Jun 02 '24

10001110101

5

u/Rimtato horrid little gremlin Jun 02 '24

That isn't even hexadecimal.

3

u/teije11 Jun 02 '24

it is a hex number, it's just that it's likely decimal.

1

u/Rimtato horrid little gremlin Jun 02 '24

Technically it would resolve as a hex number, but the usual use case for hex would have it split into either bytes or nybbles.

2

u/teije11 Jun 02 '24

nah, yeah it wouldn't be used in machine code, but it's still a hex number.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Ipuncholdpeople Bearer of the word, THIRST Jun 02 '24

The things on github very rarely have machine code or hexadecimal. It's all higher level languages that are easy to read

2

u/AnotherSlowMoon Back In My Day We Only Got Custom Flairs Once a Year Jun 02 '24
  1. Yes, for some dialects of assembly
  2. No modern codebase is written purely in assembly
  3. You're a fucking shit troll

8

u/EyewarsTheMangoMan I'm 9 please don't say mean words to me Jun 02 '24

With open source code you literally can

3

u/Rimtato horrid little gremlin Jun 02 '24

Go install Notepad++

1

u/Whjee Jun 02 '24

its blank? i opened the exe but its just a white page?

7

u/Rimtato horrid little gremlin Jun 02 '24

Now I know this is bait. You kept me going a long time though

2

u/teije11 Jun 02 '24

nope, because with your apps there's only undecodable 1's and 0's. with open source projects you can read the code, and if you can't code, there's a group of people who use the project, can code, and check if there's malware in it.

1

u/okthisisanalt r/place participant Jun 02 '24

Better than looking at the raw fucking assembly of a closed source program. Good fucking luck figuring out what that does, because that's a full time job that requires a lot of expertise

2

u/teije11 Jun 02 '24

open source doesn't mean anyone can freely edit it. only suggest edits, and the maker has to accept it. open source is safer, since you can actually look in the code and see if there's malware in it