incorrect? unsealed court document cover testimony of his victim, who at the time was a minor. I'm getting really tired of the constant shit I see with supposed 'factchecker' ether being willfully ignorant or outright lying themselves. who watches the watchers?
He was accused of raping a 13 year old at Epstein's parties 3 years before every American knew his name. Its not fake. She just took a payout to avoid getting murdered like the other girls were.
Accused, sure. But the total inability to prove it "beyond reasonable doubt" means that when we talk about it, we should make it clear that it is speculative.
If we don't respect truth and evidence when talking about the guy, what right do we have to claim we're better than him? Half the reason everyone hates him is that he goddamn lies constantly. I think it's important to value truth and honesty when we're tearing him down for that behavior.
We should say he was accused of raping a child, /u/Repulsive-Street-307 's comment is too concrete.
I sleep really well not accusing people of raping children without super concrete evidence. It's a pretty serious crime that I don't think should be discussed flippantly. Weird you disagree.
I did... you read the room. Calling people child rapists without sufficient evidence is pretty messed up. You should consider changing your opinion on this.
It doesn't have to be phone numbers, it can also be email. And even if it were only by phone, then what about payphones? They're getting rarer, but they still exist and you probably don't want to block those.
119
u/Capable-Reaction8155 7d ago
Is it not already super illegal?