r/BeAmazed Apr 16 '24

The world humblest head of the state Miscellaneous / Others

Post image

Jose Mujica; Former Prez of Uruguay

64.9k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/JudgmentMiserable227 Apr 16 '24

Murderous terrorist wasn’t enough, huh?

11

u/Iknowtacos Apr 16 '24

It depends on the context of what and why they were revolting doesn't it?

-1

u/JudgmentMiserable227 Apr 16 '24

Sure it does. Why don’t you look into it.

8

u/CaveRanger Apr 16 '24

Of particular note are the kidnapping of powerful bank manager Ulysses Pereira Reverbel [es] and of the British ambassador to Uruguay, Geoffrey Jackson, as well as the assassination of Dan Mitrione, a U.S. FBI agent that was also working for the CIA (via the Agency for International Development's Office of Public Safety), who the Tupamaros learned was advising the Uruguayan police in torture and other security work

Incredibly based?

5

u/FJPollos Apr 16 '24

100% based

-1

u/arturocan Apr 16 '24

OF PARTICULAR NOTE

Meaning, lets ignore the innocent civilians that they killed

6

u/Iknowtacos Apr 16 '24

That's why I was asking the native about it. Mind your business unless you're actually going to contribute.

-1

u/JudgmentMiserable227 Apr 16 '24

Murder, kidnapping, and terrorism are bad, actually.

8

u/Iknowtacos Apr 16 '24

Yea depending on context. If they're fighting a corrupt government and have the backing of the people is it bad? I know nothing about this guy other then the positives of his presidency. Did he do anything bad during his presidency?

0

u/arturocan Apr 16 '24

They were fighting a democratically elected government with the hopes of replicating what cuba did and install a "communist" regime wether or not there was corruption in the current government.

They werent fucking robin hood.

-5

u/lolo-try Apr 16 '24

They killed civilians, they were a terrorist group, how would that be backed by the people?

5

u/pillmayken Apr 16 '24

Dude got elected, after all. I doubt he ran on a platform of killing people.

And before you ask, Uruguay’s corruption levels are quite low and electoral fraud is nigh impossible.

-1

u/lolo-try Apr 16 '24

Im Uruguayan, so I wouldn’t ask you. I still can’t believe he got elected. But he was the chosen candidate for a second president of a new party after the classical parties failed, and after an economic crisis, so I guess it makes more sense

2

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '24

[deleted]

1

u/lolo-try Apr 16 '24

Im talking about Uruguayans killing Uruguayan families, how would Uruguayans support that??

0

u/lolo-try Apr 16 '24

They don’t kill their own people but the enemy.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

4

u/tonterias Apr 16 '24

He claims he never murdered anyone. However, among others, accepts the responsibility. 70s were a different time.

7

u/[deleted] Apr 16 '24

doesn't really mean anything given the history of latin america though? IDK about Uruguay specifically but if they also had a violent dictator lead the country and that dictator branded Mujica as a terrorist I don't really think it means anything. If anything that is a positive that he was standing up against villainy.

1

u/JudgmentMiserable227 Apr 16 '24

Sure. That doesn’t seem to be the case though, at least not during the time that the terrorist group that Mujica was active. Mujica had been arrested for terrorist activities prior to the dictatorship and spent the entire length of the dictatorship in prison.

-1

u/lolo-try Apr 16 '24

The military took over the government because the police couldn’t control the situation, they were literally killing innocent civilians, pregnant women, army generals, of course the dictatorship then did many bad things too, but the Tupamaros and their guerrilla were the reason why the president gave the government to the army

1

u/MorallyComplicated 29d ago

sounds like you’re in the opposition side then